Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlwwJyhXZ98
GlazedFreedom’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@glazedfreedom342
Original video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXsN4p7msBk
onebadvette’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@onebadvette
Previous AtA episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLCa3wp-hFc
Sources:
Article- https://bit.ly/3BPOq62
See v. City of Seattle- https://bit.ly/4biFOBF
Fla. Stat. § 901.151- https://bit.ly/3XUsq1z
Fla. Stat. § 843.02- https://bit.ly/3cEPNYL
K.A.C. v. State- https://bit.ly/3dK6gs4
Assembly Bill 51- https://bit.ly/3Y37UvJ
Cal. Veh. Code § 21658.1- https://bit.ly/4h1OakE
Cal. Veh. Code § 21754- https://bit.ly/3U4NOzU
Cal. Veh. Code § 21755- https://bit.ly/4gYZ3nn
Cal. Veh. Code § 12951- https://bit.ly/3Yl4IwQ
Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc
Heien v. North Carolina- https://bit.ly/2Yd8trm
People v. McGaughran- https://bit.ly/4eRhQPE
People v. Ruiz- https://bit.ly/4011Lm3
Thanks for being here! I hope you have a smooth Monday and a great week! As always, if you'd like to support the channel beyond liking and subscribing, then sticking around to watch the full video is the next best thing. It really helps us out in the algorithm to reach new people. See you in the next one!
Some police departments have a maximum IQ for officers. Look it up.
9:15 This cop is a psycho. and he is ignorant of FS 901.151. Just because an officer ASKS doesn't mean you HAVE TO GIVE I.D.
Passing on the right in a motorcycle is very dangerous
The law is also ambiguous. When I drive my car I have two wheels in contact with the road. It should read “only” two wheels in contact with the road.
Mr. Motorcycle gets a D-. You know the law well enough to fight lane splitting but not enough to show your license?? Tool.
if you leave a door wide open, a cop can just walk in. they will use "exigent circumstances" specifically in this case.
Mr. Needled1ck cop was SO MAD he was wrong about the actual law not the one made up in his head would not let it go, then turned into a Karen and called his boss for the intent to really mess the guys life up, not for not showing his papers but for someone actually squaring his @ss. Can you imagine him being your father or husband.
they'll treat you like absolute garbage because they think you cant afford to hold them accountable.
More “HEROES” serving and protecting the shit out of us!
I mean, I'd prefer that the police don't treat anybody like that, being a vet shouldn't matter when it comes to constitutional rights
All I want to know is "Who's on first ?" 😂
I hate police.
These cops don't understand that, without a warrant or exigent circumstances, No Trespassing signs apply to them as well.
I don’t think officers will ever learn/understand the laws concerning having to show ID. If they can’t figure out something as simple as that then there is absolutely no hope for any of them.
According to them nothing they ever do goes against their department’s policies, which makes no sense because you would think violating constitutional rights and/or breaking the law would be part of their policies.
In the second encounter, it demonstrates that ignorance of the law is only an acceptable excuse if you wear a badge.
How can he not have violated policy, when he violated civil rights??? I'd want that captains badge.
We all know that the bike rider messed up kinda.
Once a call goes to command then you deal with them.
On the side of the road is a terrible place to hold court!
That cop was looking for any reason for him to be guilty. Looked around for drugs immediately and handcuffed him even though he was not a threat.
The cops look like they are doing something by hassling this cat…. It is a lot safer than going after dangerous criminals.
Dt. Laramore in the red polo is built like an upright frog and that's all I can think about
Amazing stupidity 😮
I've got a video…the cops refused to protect my family
I said it when it first came out and I'll say it again. In the first video there is clearly more going on, name one other instance that the CHIEF shows up to a trespass.
I like the puppy dog. If you say hello to the dog it probably would have been a lot calmer
Like I tell my son, side of the road is not the place to argue. Save it for the Judge.
If this officer is prone to thinking mere existence is suspicious, then there is only one way to deal with it, and it is a constitutional right written in plain English.
The motor cycle rider is very lucky the cop didn’t beat him up the arrest him.
This cop is a total jerk. I’m 2 minutes in and mad as heck.
Unfortunately, yes. He should have chosen a different status, something more socially accepted these days, like identifying as gay or transgender. But as a Christian, a veteran, or a conservative, you’re often targeted over the smallest issues. While others might get a pass for even blatant rule-breaking, it sometimes feels like people would make an example out of you for a minor misstep.
This is a harsh reality for followers of Jesus Christ. People know that those who follow Christ are more likely to extend grace, leaning toward forgiveness and offering second chances. This kindness can make believers seem like easy targets, especially for those who think they can take advantage without consequence.
There’s something deeper going on too. Many people harbor an unconscious resentment toward those who openly serve Christ, even if they don’t fully understand it themselves. Faith, commitment to Christ’s teachings, and the peace it brings can stir up confusion and hostility in others who aren’t sure why they feel that way.
Then there’s the reality of serving the country. For some, knowing that someone has made that sacrifice can inspire respect, but for others, it creates resentment. Instead of honoring the dedication and privilege that comes with service, they might dismiss or criticize it. The good you’ve done or the sacrifices you’ve made can feel like a threat to them—a reminder of values that point others toward Christ, something they’d rather not see.
Standing firm in your beliefs today can bring pushback. But these challenges remind us of Christ’s own path—a journey that, though difficult, leads others to the truth. Hold fast, because the values you stand for are worth it, no matter the opposition.
And remember we not only serve a good God but a just one as well. These Cops deeds will not go unnoticed.