WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day 17

1. This lecture on how much a skin cell weighs was absolutely crucial to the defence's case.

2. Michelle admits to holding the garbage bag open while fotis put something in the bag during her police interview????? What did she not look what he was putting in the bag? Did she close her eyes?

   This is one NOT SMART female

   Michelle DNA was on the garbage bag [confirmed] AND the the yellow/green sponge inside the knotted garbage bag [inconclusive, but not eliminated]. No wonder why the defense attorney was freaking out about the sponge, one or two sponges, who took it out.

   Question: did they not test for dna on either poncho? They only dna tested the blood spots on the ponchos, which were all jennifer's blood.

   Inconclusive on inside the gloves for michelle n fotis [not eliminated]. WOW!!!!

   Fotis is DNA in one of gloves 27,000 times more likely. All others eliminated—inside that bag of bloody clothes AND that other glove was inconclusive with fotis/michelle/lauren/kids….!!!!

   OMG jennifer DNA on the removed car seats!!!!!

3. Nobody talkin 'bout Michelle halo hair extensions….

4. The DNA evidence seems weak.

5. Her math skills are either really bad (which I doubt) or she's trying to be deceptive. This stood out to me before any of the sidebar conversation about 6th grade math. Astoundingly bias.

6. Does anyone know if court is starting late this morning?

7. Why switch to kits with less sights for DNA? But DNA on bag of MT is big!!

8. Is this live

9. I can’t let go of the fact that FD felt comfortable throwing the license plates in the storm drain in front of MT 😮 why would he do that knowing that he would be suspect number one , his live in girlfriend could easily be questioned and tell the police she saw him throw something in there. He felt it was ok to do so because she knew what he had already done , so no reason to hide any of his post murder actions from her.

10. Boom The owner of the Tacoma was probably involved in the NEW CANAAN NAFARIOUS ACTIVITIES……. AND HIDING JENNIFER'S B…..DY! I'd bet!

11. Like watching paint dry ……😩😣😖 I feel badly for the Jury ….I would've fallen in court!

12. So, do we get a summary of all this evidence? I’m especially interested in all those items found to have FD’s and MT’s DNA and fingerprints. I suppose the fact that a lot of the things found in the trash that FD disposed of, whilst driving with MT, bear Jennifer Dulos’ DNA is incriminating in itself but I fell asleep during direct: can’t see the wood for the trees.

13. nano pico gramo y a w n…. B O R I N G 🤪

14. At this point MT is not guilty: Fotis IS guilty.

15. I just realized this — everyone complains about Michelle Troconis chewing gum during the trial. I wonder if this is a defense strategy because her defense is that she was cleaning gum off of her hand on the sidewalk, not dropping evidence down the drain.

    I subconsciously thought “I could see that because she’s always chewing gum”… then I realized that’s probably EXACTLY why we see her chewing gum, with a whole jar of gum on the defense table — to subconsciously plant this in our heads prior to that evidence coming out.

16. Who is the single individual? When she says single female individual I am assuming Jennifer Dulos.

17. Funny how whenever the defense attorney gets an answer from the witness he doesn't want he always says, "in any event…" hahaha

18. Whose electric toothbrush ? Fotis or Troconis? Jennifer?

19. There is no solid DNA evidence linking Michelle. The state is wasting jury’s time. Why are they presenting all this? I want to hear only about evidence with Michelle’s DNA on it. The state is not convincing me. I am so disappointed. I thought there was going to be some of her DNA on this evidence.

20. The defence attorney always sounds aggressive towards the witness, like he is trying to catch them in a lie.

21. Lawyer Mawhinney DNA not tested or not for tis trial?

22. Anyone else find it hard to retain anything the dna lady is saying? She may know her stuff and be able to read a report but has no ability to make me understand it. If I were the stenographer I would throw my machine at her

23. Someone already asked this question I think, but does anyone know if they swabbed the inside of the gloves? It makes sense that Jennifer's DNA is on the outside of the glove – and that her killer's DNA is in the inside of the glove

24. What a complete waste of the Jury's time. This DNA language means absolutely nothing to them. Give the results in lay terms.

25. After two failed attempts to get the truth from MT, it's highly unlikely she did not know what was happening. She did assist Fotis, somehow, some way. In hockey, if you assist, you get noted for it! Don't forget, MT made a big production about the shower on the morning of…WHY?

26. If the toothbrush is Jennifer’s DNA then why don’t they testify that DNA found on evidence a reddish stain matches Jennifer (about 2 hours 7 minutes in) rather than matches a toothbrush. Much more effective testimony.

27. I mean if the prosecutor is saying Pawel's hair could have ended up on the sponge because his hair was on his car, then it's only fair to also assume Michelle's touch dna was on the bag because it was taken from her house and she used bags from that same box before…I mean knife cuts both ways dude!

    Also "isn't it true except for the hair, Pawel was elimintaed from every single other evidence recovered?

    Well again, except from touch dna on the bag she was too!

28. questioning the witness in this trial is an act of either ignorance or a deviation from the thruth.

29. defense attorney muted 🤮

30. michelle always comes up with a false explanation , like the gum she wanted to remove from the sidewalk,keeping it Green 😅 JURORS ARE SMART .

31. Say what you want about the defense lawyer but he is the only reason we understood ANYTHING today:
    1. Michelle's touch dna was in the outside of one of the bags (that came for a bag box she bought and used on her house which could explain it)

    2.The hair was Pawel's.

    3.Everyone was exluded from being the second dna profile on Jennifer's clothes, but most importantly, Mawhinney was never tested against ANY of the evidence when we have an unidentified male all over Jennife's clothes?!?! LIKE WHY?!

32. OMG 55:55 So far the state doesn't seem to have a thing re:DNA. NOT ONE THING.

Comments are closed.