WATCH LIVE: Missing Mom Murder Trial – CT v. Michelle Troconis – Day Eight

1. 19:52 sound is on
   21:13 first witness

2. I think he took her in the suburban put her in the woods where the suburban was left. I think someone else took the body from the woods and disposed of her 😢😢😢

3. The hole in the shirt, possible bullet hole?

4. I'm gunna assume he shot her in the chest and possibly head.

5. I have never, ever seen a voir dire before every piece of evidence entered in a trial. Ever.

6. ** ~ 123K VIEWS AND ONLY 1.5K LIKES!!! CMON COURT JUKIES LETS SHOW SOME APPRECIATION FOR ~~~> LAW&CRIME NETWORK!! They do ALL the hard work to allow us very easy access to watch these trials.. PLEASE TAKE A BRIEF MOMENT TO SAY THANK YOU!! Ive been watching trials since 1995 when we didnt have YT etc it was broadcast on local television. Years later I remember *ADDI our spectacular MOD (even today) CC was really missed when your channels merged. I don't chat much but PLEASE SHOW APPRECIATION TO THE TEAM!

7. Once again the JUDGES EXPERTISE & knowledge OF THE LAW IS EXEMPLAR& the D-attorney is really a success in being anal & jerking around these 2 young prosecutors &
   Causing more confusion to the jurors, and this is his PLIGHT!!
   It will come to bite his client in the end.
   She’s no fool as a muse to here Murderous lover! She’s caused more controversy & contention in an already tense marriage!!
   5 children !!!! Poor babes
   What a date to live with.
   All the more reason Troconis is shaking in her boots!
   Her life is OVER!! Wether convicted or not, her judgement is in going for all eternity !!!!
   EXPOSED IS HER EPITAPH!!!
   Guilty as charged!!

8. I know there are multiple photos of the garbage items but they only brought out one poncho right? Or were 2 found? I need to know!

9. If the poncho doesn’t fit you must aquit 🤣

10. Well…typical situation where they cant convict the real murder they go after someo else. The poor lady was murdered in a horrific way, and the truth of the matter nothing will ever fix that for the children, family and friends. All that evidence should not have been tied to this situation, all they are doing is making the jury go after her for a murder that was not done by her. The murder was a coward that placed her in a very bad situation. Like I said Everyone wants a hanging regardless !

11. Does anyone know why they keep referring to the blood evidence as "a blood like substance" instead of just blood? It has all been tested at this point, and it's clearly blood. I thought maybe it's something they do in Connecticut because I've never heard that in another trial.

12. Defense attorney’s theme of, “I’m entitled” is a running farce. Apparently, since he didn’t require every driver of evidence or people who assembled or made video cameras, he clearly feels he’s being liberal. He’s stated as much very plainly. I’ve never seen a trial that ever had those types of witnesses and it seems there’s some agreement between attorneys beforehand to agree to that. However, he should stick to his agreement and quit raising it as though that then entitles him to get his way in other things throughout the trial!

13. I wonder if he didn't put Jennifer's body in a storage unit somewhere…those keys…

14. I feel The defendant assisted with the killing. Any evidence presented yet putting her somewhere else during the morning of May 24? I feel she helped with the killing and was cleaning while he dumped her body. No way he did the killing and cleanup in a couple hours.

15. most chill judge ever.

16. It almost seems like the Defense Council didn't bother to do any depositions before trial. He sounds like he's asking questions he doesn't know the answer for…which is extremely risky in a murder trial.

17. By the way, the persecutors don't need to prove that a murder happened because the defense already stipulated to the fact that the murder happened.

    That would be cleared up in something like opening statements. One of the lawyers or the judge would explain to the jury what is stipulated set of facts are–they are not contested in both sides agree to the validity.

    The jury has to take it as fact..

    You cant even ‘prove’ she was murdered or that a conspiracy took place.

18. Hello retired detective ❤ looks too young to be retired with a brain of knowledge. I love these kinds of vids . Thank you for making it for us ❤

19. RIP headphone users when she rips each bag open

20. This defense lawyer is a pain in the butt ,, he is trying to shoot into a fishbowl, grasping at straws

21. I’m curious how much time the prosecutor could save herself if she removed “with respect to ____” from the beginning of ALL of her questions.

22. OMG!! That is not a box cutter lol

23. they're called fender flares 🤪

24. The prosecutor not changing gloves between directly handling multiple pieces of biological evidence is absolutely appalling. The cross contamination completely voids the possibility of future testing if needed. Kent Mawhinney has yet to be tired in this case. Not to mention the appeals Michelle Troconis is going to throw at this court. Precautions would have been the wiser choice.

Comments are closed.