Victoria Prokopovitz went missing in April 2013, leaving her family and friends searching for answers. When her children were informed by police about her disappearance, they were shocked to hear Victoria’s husband, James Prokopovitz, coldly state that she was “gone” and not missing. James’s unusual behavior and lack of concern raised suspicions among Victoria’s loved ones and law enforcement. As the investigation into Victoria’s disappearance continued, James’s actions became increasingly questionable.
Subscribe for more Law&Crime: https://bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork
In the months following Victoria’s disappearance, James Prokopovitz moved on with his life, starting a new relationship with another woman. His demeanor towards law enforcement grew hostile, further fueling suspicions about his involvement in his wife’s vanishing. Despite the absence of Victoria’s body, police worked tirelessly to gather evidence and build a case against James. Through a combination of witness testimonies, inconsistencies in James’s statements, and circumstantial evidence, investigators managed to tie James to Victoria’s murder. The case took a dramatic turn when James’s girlfriend came forward with incriminating information, leading to his arrest and subsequent trial. This episode of “Killer Cases” delves into the complex investigation, the challenges faced by law enforcement, and the ultimate pursuit of justice for Victoria Prokopovitz.
Watch more episodes of Killer Cases: https://bit.ly/46zTlms
#KillerCases #TrueCrimeDocumentary #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw
He just had to be guilty because there was no one else to blame.
Be careful dealing with the government they will go after everyone you love to take you out.
Thanks
He is so mean and he cries only for himself.
Not for his wife.
I don’t think he did it. I think she unalived herself and he did not care…. It’s hard for me to believe he’s smart enough to pull off a murder.
He’s def guilty of not caring at all…. I’m struggling to believe he did it.
No enough evidence to find him guilty. Moreso, did he have enough energy to hide her body by himself.
Beyond a reasonable doubt? He might have done it, but where is the proof? No blood, DNA, things in the house, the car? Nothing?
They think that guy carried the dead weight of a body to hos works sledge pond & somehow launched her into it past the shoreline, all by himself? Reasonable doubt says the gf who off'ed herself over a simple misdemeanor may have been the guilty party & had help. I don't agree this case should've even been tried without a body & subjective circumstantial evidence.
Idk about this one…
'gotta go to court to argue & most likely plea down a misdemeanor… Might as well k*ll mys*lf!' what!?
Fate is something else.
trumpers can't tell the truth
wash that comb-over
ewwee
This is how innocent people go to jail for murder. They filibustered the jury with stuff not pertaining to the missing wife but to smear the husbands character. The state did nothing to prove murder, motive, or have any physical evidence whatsoever. And the jury still found him guilty, because they decided his fate with their emotions and not the facts of the case. Shame on them, and shame on the state.
This is the first time I say to myself, "I don't agree with the verdict" after watching one of these. I don't believe he did it, nor do I believe the prosecution proved its case. This case was a prime example of Reasonable Doubt.
I think he is guilty but I don't think I would have said so if I was on the jury. But yeah, he did it.
I am surprised at the verdict. There was reasonable doubt that he did it, based on Victoria’s own statement that you’d never find her body next time she made an attempt. What kind of jury convicts a man without any evidence?? Scary.
Sludge ponds huh? Thanks for the idea
You know what? He probably did do it. But there is definitely reasonable doubt. I think the jury called it wrong. Because even if it’s only 5% chance he is innocent, sending an innocent man to jail is disgustingly.
8:24 Her husband was such an angry person… no wonder she was depressed
They used the fact that he said "no" 3 times ti make him guilty. Then because he said he loved "that woman" they say no one says that. I've heard that many times. Maybe they all gate their wives like this detective was saying
I sure hope the innocence project got hold of this one
Crocodile Tears!!
how is he guilty????
Mostly guilty of being the most insufferable man
Bad decision
Yet they found OJ simpson Not guilty with far more evidence against him . This is a tough one . Although I lean towards guilty I’m not 100% .
Yeah I don’t think they proved anything really. I’m not even 100% convinced she dead.
If she is, he’s most likely the culprit but I don’t think they had enough evidence… of anything really besides that one statement he made wasn’t accurate but he could have just remembered wrong.
cant watch ….distracting music .
I don't believe for a moment the man is guilty.
I believe he’s innocent. My Dad always displayed anger when faced with a death of a family member. Although my mom died of natural causes I see so much of my Dad in this man and I believe he was being truthful.
He’s so damn cantankerous that you almost want to find him for sure guilty again only halfway through
That's the problem with that system of jurys, wish is regular people with a lot of prejudices, they send somebody (and i'm not saying he is innocent or guilty) to jail because he is very unpleasant, HORRIBLE SYSTEM
I don’t think that man is guilty, could’ve possibly known what happened to her, possible, but I don’t believe he unalived her, if I would seen more evidence that would that he was involved, I wouldn’t probably be saying that he’s not guilty.
wait wait wait, this is the guy where they found her remains/body buried in the basement buried under concrete, they did a scan & didn't see anything, but the second time the cadaver dog went down there for the 2nd time, they check again & he admits he ate spaghetti after he killed her cause he was hungry, right???? they even found her watch with the time she died?? am I dreaming or psychic?? or is this an old cold case file I watched that looks like another guy???
Those poor kids. His girlfriend killed herself and her kids lives are ruined. The ripple effect is so sad. I’m sorry to everyone ❤
"If someone denies something 3 times in a row, they are almost always 100 percent guilty." What!? I don't believe that!