Questions or comments? Leave a message here: (888) 548-9758 — Please note your recording may be used on the air in any of our future podcasts.
SUBSCRIBE to the True Crime Daily Podcast:
ITUNES: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-daily-the-podcast/id1451999167?mt=2
SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/5MCQgSSVQEPB6ME2jSy9u2?si=G5myKdtkSZqSbEPUc2QP2A
STITCHER: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/true-crime-daily-the-podcast?refid=stpr
GOOGLE PLAY: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Ijp3wrcww4gwujpm7i6dkadrjfm
—-
This week in True Crime Daily The Podcast: A state’s attorney visiting her former in-laws is killed by her ex-husband with their 5-year-old daughter in the next room; a murder suspect represents himself in a Cleveland case; updates to the Jayme Closs and Grace Packer cases.
(March 29, 2019)
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/crimewatchdaily
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/truecrimedaily
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrimeWatchDaily
Website: https://truecrimedaily.com/
you don't see a cat packing a gun
My comment on the girl being pushed off the bridge: this girl was actually contemplating on jumping on her own. If you watch the video the girl was over the side rail. She saw the guys do it and wanted to try as well but after standing over the ledge she got scared and said she had second thoughts and right when she said that is when her friend pushed her. Ok so she wasn’t forced over the ledge like she was to fall and I think if she had not suggested jumping on her own then her friend wouldn’t have pushed her. I don’t think the friend really thought about the consequences of just pushing her and I don’t think she meant to harm her because they were good friends BUT I don’t think it’s right to completely put full blame on her because the girl decided on her own free will that she wanted to jump and she climbed over the ledge on her own. There’s not a difference in her climbing over the rail and slipping and falling or someone playing around and pushing her. A dumb decision but the decision ultimately falls upon the girl that contemplated on jumping for fun like the others. I think she’s over reacted the entire situation. Yes it would have been tragic if she had died BUT if she had not changed her mind about jumping and had jumped on her own then the consequences could still have been the same and she could have been still seriously injured or worse and ultimately still it falls on her because she’s the one that initially wanted to jump.
I always wondered why the show which used to be "Crime Watch Daily" was canceled off Youtube. Now the show just puts out repeat episodes over and over. I have never learned why the show was cancelled and name changed to "True Crime Daily". I believe it's probably because of the backlash of the way the show looks to the public. Making entertainment, daily, out of horrible crimes and covering them. It almost promoted bad behavior and crime. I guess this podcast is the lighter version of covering crime.
Uh….uhh….uh….uh….uh….uh…. does he say anything else? 😂😂😂
Every YouTube has a damn podcast lol I just find that funny
Because why shoot the dog who can't testify against you. The dog wasn't attacking them. Why kill an innocent animal. Makes no sense except just because you can which is awful.
It's like the Luka Magnotta case. The cat stuff got to me like a real punch in the gut. I can't explain it.
Why the fuck are yall wearing headphones?
What a psycho. That poor kid. My daughter was murdered in this manner in 2017, although her ex killed himself after killing her. Their two daughters were in their car seats in his car in the driveway waiting for him to take them to the park.
2 days in jail and an easy work crew job, she could have killed her "friend". Is she remorseful? Idiotic sentencing.
It was a violent crime and two weeks is ridiculous. At least 90 days would have been more appropriate.
Pets can't testify though. So killing them is pointless, unless it's to be spiteful or if the dog actually attacks, but usually they don't. So, that means the killer has done it to be sadistic, not just to be self sparing. Obviously, most humans can testify, so you might feel obliged to kill witnesses. Such a killer is simply hostile – a menace to society who should never get out of prison.
About the last story: If anything, this woman should either get either actual time (idk 2-6 months) or no time at all because really, 2 days seems like it's making a joke out of being in prison.
2 days for punctured lungs? That is crazy! I agree with the 6 month idea.
Stacia = stay-shuh
Sad story… great coverage tho guys keep it up
I agree with one of the FB messages. People get years in jail for non violent offenses; related to weed. I believe she should take anger management classes after her 300 hours of community service is competed. I would have given her 3 weeks in jail and 300 hours of community service.
Last story, I really don't know about jail time. However, I think 1 year community service would be justified.
That poor child to lose her custodial parent in such a violent way. I don't know that if the police had been called the second the shooter turned up at the house the shooting could of been avoided? I guess what ifs do not matter any more. Bless the child.
Hey wait, do you guys have the biggest true crime site in the world!?! I had no idea 😁
Shouldnt get jail time.Just he should pay her medical bills and other bills that may occure
No jail time. It was not malicious. Pay her medical bills and 100 hours community service.
NOT THE DOG 😱