City Says Man Has NO Rights Because He’s Mexican. Seriously. Jury Seems To Agree

1. Merch
   
   https://james-freeman.creator-spring.com/listing/new-back-the-blue-till-it-happ?product=46&variation=2742&size=425
   
   Source: AP article
   
   https://apnews.com/article/mississippi-police-shooting-immigrant-wrong-house-711a0c4e974e9ee947fc1b1dc914c1cd?utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
   
   South Haven Police Department
   
   https://www.facebook.com/SPD1980
   
   Page · Police Station
   
   8691 Northwest Drive, Southaven, MS, United States, Mississippi
   
   (662) 393-8652
   
   southaven.org/212/Police
   
   southaven.org

2. So people can kill any body who don’t belong in this country ?

3. The Mississippi sh!t is unnecessary. Just makes you sound ugly. But of course you’re a New Mexican, so there’s that. 😅

4. Jury was right

5. Because jurors information is available so that the BLUE LINE GANG members can use intimidation

6. Constitutional rights are natural rights. #FAFO

7. I have no tolerance for someone who intentionally entered our country illegally, especially when they have illegal firearms. I’m all for having firearms but have no patience for criminals having illegal firearms.

   I cannot imagine sneaking or breaking into Italy, using their tax payers’ money in order to live, attain illegal goods, then have the gall to sue the country (the Italian people) for millions of dollars because my spouse was shot by the police there. I would also understand that I am not Italian and I would not expect the have the same rights as Italians.

8. Im almost positive the law ACTUALLY SAYS ANYONE WITHIN THE BORDERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARE PRIVILEGED TO ALL OF OUR LAWS!!

9. Sickening.

10. That EXPLAINS THAT !! 😊

11. On the wrong address thing. I deliver food and I'm dyslexic so for me it's easy to go to the wrong place. But I'm not showing up with guns blazing either. So no harm no foul.

12. That's the most horrible government invasion 😢 My God, he died from a gunshot in the BACK of his head. He watched his dog die. His widow watched them murder her dog and then the homeowner 😢 My God.

13. If you ever find yourself having a jury deciding your fate. Don't count on them being responsible. They judge by feelings not what the law is. Proof? They don't need proof. They just need a good story. The best lawyers are good story tellers. Nothing more.

14. I've ordered hundreds of deliveries from amazon to food, and not once did it get delivered to the wrong address, these pigs can't get a address correct to something much more important.

    ACAB!

15. Maybe they should stop these folks at the border so this won’t happen, too easy

16. Everyone in the U.S. should be treated as if they have rights. If we don't, then everywhere interaction with law enforcement will start with people having to prove citizenship. Police will take that too far

17. So if you go to America and the police murder you its ok 🤔🤔🤔 get this one out there and there goes all the money from tourists. They was just all a butch of racists.

18. Wow so no DNA on the gun. Ya seems like the cops took out a bean man with no justification

19. Make no mistake, "We only have the rights of least among us. "

20. I agree constitutional rights should apply to all citizens of Earth. End of story. It should not be a question. If one human being has more rights than the other. We are all endowed by our creator.

21. This is exactly why you should never say that the Constitution grants you rights. It does not. It recognizes certain human rights, and gives them legal protection. It does not create them, it does not grant them, it only recognizes them, imperfectly.

22. I’ve been reading comments about rights, and I don’t think the link between government, civil rights, and Rights endowed by our Creator are well understood. The right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness are universal rights and have nothing to do with citizenship nor country. Mexicans have the right to Life regardless of immigration status. Rights listed in the Bill of Rights are those which the US Government is prohibited from interfering with pertaining to citizens. They don’t pertain to Mexicans on US soil illegally.

23. I agree 100% with ya JAmes, we will never know the truth either sadly

24. Laws are of the land, not the nationality

25. All person's within the jurisdiction or territories of the United States enjoy the protections of the constitution.
    The constitutional limitations on government still apply to any and all government agents regardless of time place and manner.
    We cannot allow those who act on behalf of the constitution to interpret the constitution as anything less than the sole origin of their authority.
    The fourteenth amendment might read as applying to states but the State would have no argument whatsoever to claim the federal government has power the states do not and those powers originate outside of the constitution.
    No state shall deprive ANY PERSON, of LIFE, LIBERTY or PROPERTY, without due process of the law.

    Do we wear some badge, insignia or tattoo saying we are a citizen? How would it ever be possible to identify between a citizen and non citizen on sight?
    We cannot. And we do not pretend our laws only apply to certain people's. Our laws apply to any person within the jurisdiction not that law.

    The biggest counter to the states claim is simple. If they have no rights they have no obligation to follow our laws, respect our government or respect our rights.
    You have rights only if everyone else has the same. Take from one, take from all.

    It is possible the shooting might still be found within policy regardless of the citizen/rights argument.
    It is a shame the two issues get conflated as one.
    Do you have the right to kill a person who is not a citizen?
    Nope, it's still murder.
    Our rights are natural and from the very beginning of this Nation we have recognized some eternal truths and fundamental principles.

    The United States of America was founded by The Declaration of Independence not The Constitution.
    The Constitution was the framework of government placed upon the foundation of principles, rights and interest essential to individual freedom.
    We hold these truths to be self evident. That all men are created equal and bestowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, chief among these life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
    These are the founding principles of the nation. Notice it says nothing about citizenship, religion, race or gender. All men are created equal, all rights are equal.
    The privileges of citizenship are privileges not rights.
    If the jury used the citizenship argument they should be charged with deprivation of rights under color of law. The jurors were acting under color of law, as representatives of the people and bound by the laws and constitution of the land.
    Their individual decisions aside, they are personally responsible and liable for their own conduct and should be held as such.
    To prevent putting juries in a position where they are liable. The judge should have declared a mistrial as soon as the state presented such a ridiculous, unlawful, unconstitutional claim as legal argument.
    The judge can throw it out but he cannot erase it from the minds of the jurors.
    This is not a novel legal theory never attempted before. The 14th amendment addresses this issue as it has been raised numerous times prior to the drafting of the 14th amendment July, 1868.
    This issue is not a question, not a legal theory and should put the prosecution individually liable for even attempting to bias the jury in this way, deprive a person of their rights under color of law.
    And the prosecutors should be charged with conspiracy to deprive resulting in death which would result in both the officers and the prosecutors facing the death penalty.
    I'm betting if the system actually worked impartially and equally, just charging these traitors would prevent anyone trying this crap for another 170 years.

    Might want to highlight the opposing counsel on this one. How they managed to lose this case and not drive home to the jury equal protection, equal rights for all, is embarrassingly incompetent.

    But let's be honest as well. The state has nearly unlimited resources, they run the court and the law. It cost money to get the best jury, the best lawyers and present the best case.

    And finally, the judge should be imprisoned as well. The judge reserves the power and ability to end this. Declare a mistrial or even invalidate a verdict of guilt. He failed us all by presiding over a travesty of injustice and did nothing to prevent it happening again.

    It's a decent system on paper, in reality it isn't working.

26. Let's put this in context.

    If you were in a different country, and the cops came and "accidentally" executed you, is that ok? Are people not safe from police if in a different country? 🤔

27. If constitution applies only to citizens, good luck with tourism, America!

28. NEVER OPEN YOUR FRONT DOOR!!!❤❤❤ OR ANY DOOR!!
    NEVER
    NEVER
    NEVER!!!❤❤❤❤❤

29. Ok so if i shoot some body and he just happens to not be a U.S. citizen I won't be held accountable either right…i say that is the worst wrong message to send..

30. I haven't watched yet but if your here illegally you don't have American rights

31. Everyone in the United States should have the same rights. Period

32. Terrorists approved by the state.

33. Criminal cartel called this government

34. How is a illegal a home owner?

35. So i honestly wondered if this wasn't JUST satire. With your consistent demeanor. Up to the end. And well.. I can't say I disagree. 😢

36. Mississippi

37. Stop removing my comments…… STOP. GIVING. IN. AND. START. DEFENDING. OURSELVES! STOP. PERPETUATING. THE. SYSTEM,. IT IS DESIGN. TO BE. AGAINST. YOU. SO YOU. HAVE. TO. GO. TO. COURT. BECAUSE. INNOCENT. OR. NOT. REGARDLESS. IT. GENERATES. REVENUE. FOR. THE. STATE. RECLAIMED. OUR FREEDOM,. DEFEND. OURSELVES!!

38. Why do you pay cops?

39. Dont sound like a mistake of address it sound like a hit
    That a rigged jury probably all related to cops .

40. Common sense, really. Rights are for American citizens, here in the USA. Foreigners without legal status are not entitled to that which legal citizens possess.

41. Your here illegally No rights. Kick rocks illegal mexxs

42. Us citizens only.

43. The constitution ensures that all people within our borders have rights. Those rights may not include voting or other rights contingent on citizenship, but you always have a right to life. We would be angry if an American citizen was shot or beaten by police in France if he had overstayed his visa.

44. The United States constitution only applies to American citizens. Illegal aliens are no different than escaped convicts. However human rights like life and liberty are universal. So while I have no problem with the police dragging his ass out and deporting him, they need to have the warrant to go into the house to get him first. And how the hell does an invader without any credentials to his real identity gain own property it America? I think the Mississippi jury is covering up murder for the police, but they’re also telling these illegals get the fuck out.

45. He doesn't have basic human rights because he's here illegally? How convenient that they didn't have body cam footage. This sounds like he was pissed they shot his Dog. How did he get shot in the back of the head? Who made those cops the Jurors and executioners for this man's basic rights?

Comments are closed.