The Oldest Lawyer Joke Was Written in His Contract… – Everything Law and Order Blog

State Bar of California https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/LicenseeSearch/QuickSearch

“ordinary course of business” https://www.mylawquestions.com/in-law-what-is-the-ordinary-course-of-business.htm

“we don’t under stand the practice of law, so we look to those who understand the language of law” https://www.law.du.edu/index.php/law-school-learning-aids/legal-language

“Conflicts of Interests”
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_7_conflict_of_interest_current_clients/

Dilatory Practices of the State Agents https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/43/729.html
“the answering phase” https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/answer
“Responses to the Answers” https://www.lawhelpnc.org/files/CF76DC62-D528-7183-3117-39472C017826/attachments/7B3ADFA8-5301-4312-B697-E6D2F9401206/consumer-instructions-to-answer-a-complaint.pdf

Federal Jurisdiction https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/federal-courts

“Statute of Limitations” https://www.courts.ca.gov/9618.htm

Interrogatories https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/interrogatories

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

By phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

3 thoughts on “The Oldest Lawyer Joke Was Written in His Contract…”
  1. "Interrogatories": Written questions submitted to a party from his or her adversary to ascertain answers that are prepared in writing and signed under oath and that have relevance to the issues in a lawsuit.

    Dilatory Practice: He applied for a default judgment in 1976, but his dilatory conduct allowed the action to be dismissed [L.A. No. 32259. Supreme Court of California. August 13, 1987.]

    "Conflicts of Interest" (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or (2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. (b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; (2) the representation is not prohibited by law; (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
    4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

    https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_7_conflict_of_interest_current_clients/

Comments are closed.