Mueller’s Seven-Hour Testimony Changed Nothing – Everything Law and Order Blog

Former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley talks about Mueller’s past incompetence and describes how the hearing is the movie following the book and amounted to “Much Ado About Nothing.”

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

The Real News is a viewer-supported media network bringing you the stories from the frontlines of the fight for a better world.

By phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

35 thoughts on “Mueller’s Seven-Hour Testimony Changed Nothing”
  1. Aaron must be on the nose with you guys and given he said you didn't always back him up on Russiagste we can guess why.

  2. A lessor man would have caved a long time ago.. In fact, nobody expected this nonsense to get this far, especially the DNC and our Intelligence Agencies! Therefore they never prepared for this part – and it shows! Trump Wins once again!

  3. The legal definition of exoneration and how it's actually used in criminal court is very simple. Anyone can look it up in any legal dictionary. For any court in America to legally exonerate anyone, that person must be first convicted of a crime. An exoneration is "literally" what happens when a conviction is overturned. Or put another way, An exoneration is a process that returns a convicted person to their original state of innocence.

    Everyone is conflating the colloquial term Exoneration with the legal term. Trump used the colloquial, as in "I was exonerated in the eyes of the public". Any lawyer however, fully understands that a legal exoneration is what happens when a conviction is overturned, that's all it is and nothing more. Mueller could not exonerate Trump because he had never been convicted. Bringing the word exoneration into the report but using it in it's colloquial form is unheard of. There is only one reason to possibly do this and it's to cast a shadow of doubt. (same for his dissembling on obstruction)

    In civil court exoneration refers to either Bail Exoneration or the discharge of a judgment. There is no such thing as a civil exoneration of a criminal case, not in any legal sense. That would still be the colloquial. A civil case might exonerate you in the eyes of the public but it's not a legal determination of guilt or innocence in any way, shape or form.

  4. Teddy find his testicles yet after Candace lovingly tore them off and tossed them down the hall ? Hes a real piece of work for sure.

  5. I've seen a lot of Russiagate coverage and this piece is up their with the best of them.

  6. Surely it is obvious — for over 2 years the same lies have been repeated over and over, even when they have been proven to be Lies. As Oliver Stone said: this has nothing to do with Russia — it is about US politics.
    Why is there no Investigation into the crimes revealed by Chelsea Manning (through Wikileaks)? No, that will never happen — instead Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange must be shut down.

  7. I haven't had time to watch the video yet (I will) but after watching all of the painful testimony, I think that it changed everything. When Mueller was pressured hard enough, he was forced to clear Trump entirery, even though he was reluctant to do so and tried to insinuate that Trump might be guilty although the FBI had absolutely no evidence against him, because they also didn't have any evidence Trump is innocent.

    The testimony also showed that Mueller is either demented or a liar. He didn't hear and didn't understand most questions and would only answer references to his own writing if it was read to him. I consider myself a moron in many senses, but when it comes to something I have worked fulltime with and written down thoroughly, you'd better believe I can remember it.

  8. He could’ve recommended indictment. He could’ve met the threshold of obstruction but he did not draw a conclusion where the guidelines says that he SHALL

  9. Good question, what have we learned from all this? Russell Means, a true american, said that the English language is the language of lies. I don't know but English seems to be the preferred language of liars.

  10. This all happens because the people are stupid enough to pay these vultures to B.S. them over and over. The pundits who spend their time talking about all the B.S. are as much to blame as they never offer solutions to the problems. The power brokers steal your money and you pay them to do it. That's all folks.

  11. The report did NOT say that Russia definitively interfered in the election- Mueller is lying- just like he did to get us into the Iraq war

  12. The whole story is an obstruction of reality. The public is pushed into endlessly gazing at a show of presumed complexity, we hear endless legalese rants about nothing, and all appears in a fog of rhetoric that you’re supposed to somehow admire: If you haven’t followed all the endless details you’re bound to be lost in that fog, making you feel uniformed or not smart enough. And that’s the way they want it on both sides: spreading an unspecific and deliberately vague fear of some Russian omnipresence, and a vague fear of everything foreign, whether its Russian or Mexicans. Forgetting all the real issues is the shared goal. We’re all supposed to trust no one. You’re supposed to believe that you are being manipulated, not by these politicians on both sides, but by external forces. It is an atmosphere that can lead to wars.

  13. I'm 67. I'm certainly not as sharp as I used to be. I doubt I've ever been sharp enough to work in critical government positions. Watching these people today leads me to believe way to many of these people there now are just too feeble to be there any more. Mueller definitely should be retired as should be many on both sides of the aisle; Pelosi, McConnell, Schumer, Biden for examples. Bernie Sanders is of the few who appears to have all his critical thinking skills working at 79. I hope the millennials hurry up and clean house.

  14. THE PEOPLES OF PUERTO RICO HAVE SPOKEN. THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT MAKE A JOKE OF THE PEOPLE THEY TOOK BACK THEIR COUNTRY…AMERICA WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO???

  15. WE HAVE LEARN MULLER CAN SAY ,NOPS ,NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS ,IN 7 WAYS …TO CONFUSE YOU !!THE MAGIC OF MULLER ,IS HIDING WHO HE IS !HE HAS A LONG CARRIER ,OF LYING !!WITH THE CLINTONES" SINCE THE WHITE GATES !HE DID NOT RIGHT THAT REPORT ,MUMBELING…

  16. Exactly Colleen. Aaron Mate was one of the best voices on this topic. Much of his work presented right here on TRN. So where is he now?

  17. Why don’t y’all bring Aaron Matè on? He used to be on The Real News And has proved himself to be the foremost expert on Russiagate and it’s telling, sad really, that you don’t bring him on…😒

  18. "This was the movie from the book" says it all. If Congress read the report, they might glean something worthy of impeachment, but then their campaign fundraising would have to be stalled! The DNC was remiss in investigating Interstate Crosscheck scandal by the RNC, and the eligibility infractions by many Electoral College delegates. They were remiss in calling out election fraud issues across the nation, which would have disqualified both candidates from the duopoly.

  19. Yes, Coleen is correct in exposing Dems and Reps for "putting Mueller on the piedestal". I'm afraid also Jill Stein expressed respect for him.

Comments are closed.