Would Jay Inslee Take on the Military to Fight Climate Change? – Everything Law and Order Blog

At Netroots Nation 2019, we asked Democratic Presidential Candidate Jay Inslee focused on climate change, if he’d take on the largest institutional emitter of fossil fuels: the Pentagon

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

The Real News is a viewer-supported media network bringing you the stories from the frontlines of the fight for a better world.

By phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

16 thoughts on “Would Jay Inslee Take on the Military to Fight Climate Change?”
  1. Everyone should have minimal militaries and divert as much resource as possible to immediate climate action. Also so tired of hearing people say climate change is real. Seems like in Europe that debate is long over aside from a few nut jobs on YouTube comments.

  2. You go Dharna Noor!
    He is right about the US Navy seaweed biofuel program, it is impressive. But then again, it is still Diesel fuel that produces exactly the same CO2 output as Diesel refined from stuff pumped up out of the ground.
    Overall I give his answer 1★ out of a possible 3. He is no Bernie Sanders or Tulsi Gabbard.

  3. Why are they all wanking on about the military using biofuel like they are a greener source of energy? They still produce the same emissions when burnt. The US currently has only managed to plant around 50% of it's corn this year due to flooding caused by climate change. Where exactly are they planning on growing the masses of crops required to make bio fuel from? The logic just does not weigh up.

  4. Whatta guy ,like a hammer only seeing nails, let's hear it for renewable energy running our killing machines all over the World.
    A simple followup question was needed about resolving differences without blowing people up ( the MAJORITY of victims of war are civilians), making their environment toxic and even poisoning the future for survivors and their following generations from depleted uranium from the shells that litter their remaining world.

     Plus no matter what these killing machines run on, war is war, and war in particular is the most environmentally destructive force on Earth to air, water, plants, animals, the entire ecosystem, and ALL of our lives.

  5. Biofuels still produce CO2.

    The paradigm has to change (…it will change, whether some like it or not…).

    1. Discard the notion of 'sovereignty'.
    2. Dismantle the military industrial complex. Decommission all military assets.
    3. Abolish all weapons – including personal firearms.
    4. End war.
    5. Abolish capitalism.
    6. Redistrubion of wealth.

  6. This guy is obviously not serious about climate change at all. Just run the bombers in biofuel and we’re good. Yeah ok.

Comments are closed.