Supreme Court’s Gerrymandering Decision a Danger to Democracy – Everything Law and Order Blog

Justice Kagan’s minority opinion calls out the threat that the decision represents to our right to vote and to our democratic future. Suzanne Almeida of Common Cause discusses the implications

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

The Real News is a viewer-supported media network bringing you the stories from the frontlines of the fight for a better world.

By phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

21 thoughts on “Supreme Court’s Gerrymandering Decision a Danger to Democracy”
  1. America is founded upon Gerrymandering. Indigenous people were not included from the very beginning. So-called 'democracy' was established without them. American politics is nothing but HYPOCRISY.

  2. The supreme court is compromised and CORRUPT. Gerrymandering is getting CRIMINALS like BERNIE SANDERS ELECTED. The American people have LOST OUR FREEDOM ..The AMERICAN people have LOST ALL HOPE in AMERICAN courts..

  3. Those who take the oath to defend the Constitution (cops… judges.. and politicians) and then use their public position to WILLFULLY and INTENTIONALLY abridge or infringe on those rights are TRAITORS against the United States. They are the very definition of the domestic threat mentioned in the OATH they took!!😠

  4. Nothing should be considered but population and natural boundaries. We have party and racial districts all over the country. Districts should completely neutral.

  5. Giving all the weight in an election to one side or the other without any checks or balances means that of course our political parties are going to take advantage of their power. My worry here is that we're already disenfranchising people who've voted religiously for years simply because their vote doesn't count any more toward who represents them. Giving this power to the polarizing forces that is our 2-party system just seems moronic!

Comments are closed.