Institutionalizing Lawlessness: Systematically Subverting Markets – Everything Law and Order Blog

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader gives the closing talk at the forum, “Destroying the Myths of Market Fundamentalism,” held in Washington DC, on October 19, 2018

Visit https://therealnews.com for more stories and help support our work by donating at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

The Real News is a viewer-supported media network bringing you the stories from the frontlines of the fight for a better world.

By phillyfinest369

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (phillyfinest369.com)

36 thoughts on “Institutionalizing Lawlessness: Systematically Subverting Markets”
  1. License agreements instead of contracts, so they can change the rules whenever they want, and You can't sue them for that. You cannot "buy" software anymore, you just acquire a license key.

  2. Pretty much what I've been telling people around me (I'm still alive somehow); they can't impeach Trump for anything because they've made everything he has done legal. You can collude with foreign countries (specially since it is a time of peace), you're allowed to take bribes from foreign countries (lobbying they call it), a former general is allowed to work on behalf of foreign countries as a lobbyist, and many more insane corrupt behavior.

  3. Breitbart was just talking about the Cuban prison system and how they are breaking international law with their food supply.

    Total disregard to looking in the mirror.

    Not shocked, but it truly is unbelievable how their fans swallow their hypocritical bullshit.

  4. An even better place to start is the courtrooms. Learn your due processes of law and your constitutional rights. Then take to the courts as a reporter but when you report point out where the judge defense attorney and prosecutor are colluding against the defendant it won't take long for you to see it. It's all they do all day everyday and people just accept it being ruled over with tyrannical impunity being coerced into testifying against themselves. The criminals have taken the courts they're wearing robes and passing down verdicts with complete impunity provided them by a complacent populace.

  5. Portuguese Panties

    “I've not seen panties like those before. It's as if they were manufactured in a foreign country.”

    “They were. I bought them in Portugal.”

    “Do Portuguese women wear them in the Olympics?”

    “Yes they do. These panties improve circulation to combat vulvular fatigue.”

    “Wow! You sure do know a lot about Portuguese panties!”

  6. Hey Ralph, take your time…….

    Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory
    jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon
    the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial
    agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction,
    which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This
    jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent,
    rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of
    contracts under the Common Law.

    All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-
    called "statutes" of legislative bodies being enforced in these
    Legislative Tribunals are not "statutes" passed by the
    legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as
    "commercial obligations" to the Federal United States for anyone
    in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States
    who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States
    and who has accepted the "benefit," or "privilege," of
    discharging his debts with the limited liability "benefit"
    offered to him by the Federal United States … EXCEPT those who
    availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of
    law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform
    Commercial Code at Section 207.

    When used in conjunction with one's signature, a stamp stating
    "Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207" is sufficient to indicate to the
    magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called
    "courts") that the signer of the document has reserved his Common
    Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial
    obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter
    knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case
    in any Common Law contract.

    Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being
    enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement,
    must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of
    America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does
    not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed
    enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law.
    He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his
    unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the
    Republic, while those about him "curse the darkness" of
    Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free
    themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States,
    even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue.

    # # #

    ADDENDUM

    U.C.C. 1-207:4 Sufficiency of reservation.

    Any expression indicating any intention to preserve rights is
    sufficient, such as "without prejudice," "under protest," "under
    reservation," or "with reservation of all our rights."

    The Code states an "explicit" reservation must be made.
    "Explicit" undoubtedly is used in place of "express" to indicate
    that the reservation must not only be "express" but it must also
    be "clear" that such a reservation was intended.

    The term "explicit" as used in U.C.C. 1-207 means "that which is
    so clearly stated or distinctively set forth that there is no
    doubt as to its meaning." …

    U.C.C. 1-207:7 Effect of reservation of rights.

    The making of a valid reservation of rights preserves whatever
    rights the person then possesses and prevents the loss of such
    right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel ….

    U.C.C. 1-207:9 Failure to make reservation.

    When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a
    reservation thereof causes a loss of the right and bars its
    assertion at a later date ….

    U.C.C. 1-103:6 Common law.

    The Code is "Complementary" to the common law which remains in
    force except where displaced by the Code ….

    A statute should be construed in harmony with the common law
    unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the common
    law. … "The Code cannot be read to preclude a common law
    action."

    EXAMPLE

    Your Honor, my use of "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" above my
    signature on this document indicates that I have exercised the
    "Remedy" provided for me in the Uniform Commercial Code in Book 1
    at Section 207, whereby I may reserve my Common Law right not to
    be compelled to perform under any contract, or agreement, that I
    have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.
    And, that reservation serves notice upon all administrative
    agencies of government — national, state and local — that I
    do not, and will not, accept the liability associated with the
    "compelled" benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreement.

    P.S. These "statutes' have been moved to UCC 1-308…..

  7. We know what is wrong but most of us don't know how they do it to us. But we don't seem to have anything we can do. They are fixing elections, so we may not even be able to vote them out if we had anyone to vote for who could do anything if they got in.

  8. You don't make money suing crooks because the judges protect them. I tried suing, among others, a notoriously crooked car dealer. The judge found that my client did not sustain an ascertainable loss losing a working car. That dealer lost his license later when the AG went after him but he got a license in another state.

  9. 50 yrs ago my father said that. Ralph. Nader should be president. How true he was he gives a rational approach to societal issues. Trump is a symtom of american issues not the cause. He can. Never solve any problem because he s no better than the elites he professed to want to drain from. D. C. And the country

  10. This is probably one of the best speeches that I've heard from Ralph Nader. The Federalist Society has been playing the long game boiling the American people like frogs, one law or redaction at a time. The people need to wake up, unless they want to live in a Banana Republic.

Comments are closed.