Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eDoyEmBddg
KTVU FOX’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@KTVUFox2
Original video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6f3ROehISaU
PINAC News’ channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PINACNews
Sources:
Articles:
https://bit.ly/3X5FKQh
https://bit.ly/4g4VrzC
McComas Lawsuit: https://bit.ly/4fYjwIB
United States v. De Castro: https://bit.ly/3AKM8oi
Glik v. Cunniffe: https://bit.ly/3X9a2Bo
Fordyce v. City of Seattle: https://bit.ly/4cKvtyD
Terry v. Ohio: https://bit.ly/2J0VbqK
United States v. Cortez: https://bit.ly/4g8SDSg
United States v. Black: https://bit.ly/3AMqtwa
United States v. DeBerry: https://bit.ly/4dJvMLr
Adderly v. Florida: https://bit.ly/4dMrfrq
District of Columbia v. Heller: https://bit.ly/4dIU9IV
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen: https://bit.ly/3XwyZHt
Thanks for tuning in! Don't forget to stick around and watch our coverage of both of today's interactions. Hope you have an awesome day and a wonderful week!
Anyone else giggle every time he said “bald knob”?
The first story is the best example of why you should not be required to provide identification to an officer when a crime is not involved. That officer most likely would have used that information to target the homeowner with retribution. Given the circumstances and comments of the homeowner this altercation may have been retribution from a prior incident.
"Are you some kind of constitutionalist some kind of crazy?" How is exercising your constitutional rights some kind of crazy behavior… I'd like him to explain that to me…
Officer: are you some kind of constitutionalist, a crazy guy?
Me: do you mean an American that lives under the right of the constitution?…well yes, yes I am…
How is it that review of constitutional related case law isn't required continuing education for police officers? It should be mandatory that every time a federal court anywhere makes a determination on police activity and constitutional rights, that every officer in every department must study the ruling and pass a test to remain certified. Most officers don't know the law because their training in the law is brief and not revisited, even as laws or interpretations change.
Why is perjury and deception by cps in family court ignored ? After the first perjury when isn't it now human trafficking protected by qualified immunity . Honest individuals don't need protection for crimes only criminals do!
Can't be on city property with a fire arm? So is he trying to say you cant be in the city with a firearm? All of the city is 'city property' such stupidity. Shouldn't any restrictions be posted?
All his benefits should be revoked 🤷♂️
A constitutionalist crazy guy right here and damn proud of it!
Seems to have all started with little man syndrome.
Constitutionalist crazy guy, that speaks volumes about his preconceived bias.
Is this guy for. Real
This was the cop's last gasp at Officer of the Month after 20+ years and he failed. 😂
Clowns
It's becoming more and more frequent lately that cops say, "are you one of these crazy constitutionalist guys"? in these police interaction videos. Seems like this is the new label used by LEOs. "Crazy Constitutionalist" is scary to hear, used in a negative context, by government enforcers. They're saying the quiet part, out loud.
Can you imagine saying BALD KNOB POLICE! ..LET ME SEE YOUR HANDS! 😭
He ha a little man complex. Bad cop!
I don’t believe the Police owe anyone a welcoming or helpful demeanor, especially if they’re filming, it may be constitutionally protected but it’s almost always a hostile action or at least can be perceived as a hostile action by police when you do film them and they’re under no obligation to be nice to you if you do it they just can’t order you to do anything lawfully if they don’t have any other reasonable suspicion.
This doesn't change anything. Cops kept him waiting as a form of retaliation. They knew he was in the clear.
Is it not really called Bald Knob is it 😂😂