Officers Serve Auditor with Restraining Order – Everything Law and Order Blog

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nse-bVWjWE

Real World Police’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChaEeYV0iibwFqrmFYTweVA

Sources:

Mark v. Seattle Times- https://bit.ly/3eBbVRa

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan- https://bit.ly/3u0jwPV

Tilton v. Cowles Publishing Co.- https://bit.ly/3nuoPV1

RCW 10.14.080- https://bit.ly/3aJGDGC

RCW 10.14.020- https://bit.ly/3gJOEiy

Virginia v. Black- https://bit.ly/3gKDpGJ

RCW 9A.46.020- https://bit.ly/3gKDpGJ

State v. Smith- https://bit.ly/2S03jfd

RCW 9A.16.020- https://bit.ly/32WZsBS

State v. Cross- https://bit.ly/3gKFQJx

source

23 thoughts on “Officers Serve Auditor with Restraining Order”
  1. I personally have met and worked for the Griggs. I was a supervisor in their company. Mr Giggs is a very passive man. Non confrontational in every manor. I have the highest respect for the Griggs family and organization as well as the charity they give in their community. I didn’t leave this company on good terms yet still support this business as I have for 38 years

  2. Auditor? I think they were more accurate in the descriptor "Protestor" with this guy. I mean, within the first 20 seconds he's just babbling a mile a minute and how everyone's unfair and he's a victim and blah blah blah. I don't know, I just detected that sense of "This guy's probably an ass" within the first few moments of him talking. Maybe it's just me, I don't know. I guess it's possible that everyone else is a jerk and this guy's just completely innocent and someone decided to assault him for no reason. Although I tend to doubt that's actually the case. 😂 Awesome job by this officer. And while we don't get much info on the gentleman who owns the business, I can only surmise that this motor-mouth is probably there disrupting the man's business and he probably told him to kick rocks and go do that chit somewhere else. And this dill hole COMES BACK. It just reeks of the sort of person who stands in front of an ice cream store and harasses customers complaining about the bank across town. Kudos to the officer who handled this situation though. I certainly hope they make him a training officer because he would be extremely well suited for that. In fact they should send him around to a bunch of these other departments we see so much of that desperately need some good training. Well done officer!

  3. I can see why all “if then statements” wouldn’t be protected. “If you don’t back away from me then I will defend myself” is a lot different than “if I wasn’t in these handcuffs then I’d beat your fuckin ass” lol

  4. I hear a man who is angry and is using 1st Amendment rights to try to curtail another’s 2nd Amendment rights. Without the 2nd Amendment there would be no 1st. There is a 2nd Amendment and there are ideologies that oppose it.

Leave a Reply