Download NewsVoice for FREE here: https://newsvoice.com/app/audittheaudit

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Facebook: https://bit.ly/3fKIZF8

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Audit the Audit 2: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://bit.ly/3iVUqfC

The Mango House’s Facebook page: https://bit.ly/3ejlTVf

Sources:

Use of force: https://bit.ly/3efTX4p

APD policy: https://bit.ly/2ZnFjUs

CRS 14-4-502: https://bit.ly/38R0rpt

CRS 14-4-503: https://bit.ly/2W8kJFK

CRS 14-4-504: https://bit.ly/38Otfil

CRS 42-4-1402: https://bit.ly/2We2oqR

Dr. Parmar’s blog: https://bit.ly/3iXLiHF

The Mango House: https://bit.ly/2WeKd4e

Local coverage:
https://bit.ly/3fo1e3x
https://bit.ly/2Wf02rL

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

33 thoughts on “Doctor Removes Officer From His Property”
  1. So, any person that enters a property and claims it be his/hers should be taken as absolutely honest? And if the next time a person late at night tells an officer it’s his property and then proceeds to rob it because the officer leaves immediately…

  2. Any jurist would say it's your property and can drive to and fro anyway you like it's your property and can make up your own rules about anything on it

  3. If there were signs about trespassing why did the cop think it doesn't apply to him especially when asked by the owner This is one really dumb cop

  4. His property..he makes the rules. He could have been blind drunk driving on HIS property as long as the public was not endangered.
    Attitude by the cops not getting their way..the cop may think twice when dealing with intelligent, not easily itimidated people!

  5. A docter does more for the community than police ever have, next they'll enforce a cerfew so that no one else can work except them. They're just going making up fake rules that they use as excuses to screw everyone else.

  6. I didn't know the city was allowed to control direction of traffic on private property like this – are they gonna valetv or tow vehicles? Do i go in on the left or right side? I don't wanna get fucked up. I solved the problem, instead of directional arrows, I'll just put question marks…

  7. The judge ended up saying that "both men acted poorly," despite the drawn weapon, and Henderson's admission that he was trained with a "warrior mentality" to look out for himself, first.

  8. This cop has a serious mental problem definitely not suitable to be a police officer, making stuff up to justify his piss poor performance. Coming in the wrong way I would think as it is private property I don't think that that would be the case certainly not in civilised countries.

  9. It's his property he decides how to enter it up to him,the arrows are just guide lines and not official traffic markings. That what I would argue it they try get me for careless driving.

Comments are closed.