Officers Use Suspicion To Seize Property – Everything Law and Order Blog

Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

Sometimes questionable case law is abused by officers and lower courts to justify the actions of the police. It is important to challenge the constitutionality of vague laws when the opportunity presents itself.

Twitter: https://bit.ly/2XxjNwo

Original video: https://bit.ly/2Y3CM1T

Sources:
https://bit.ly/32pW7Ke
https://bit.ly/2XQk0XM
https://bit.ly/2BoSd7I
https://bit.ly/2XQk21Q
https://bit.ly/2xOcemC
https://bit.ly/2NdjMdh

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complimentary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

source

50 thoughts on “Officers Use Suspicion To Seize Property”
  1. Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them. That said, enjoy the video!

  2. He shows how inept the police are that work there by starting out with "we have had a couple vehicles stolen" So your department cant keep their own vehicles from being stolen out of their own lot. Way to go.

  3. My favorite saying for the few times I've had officers come up to me and say that I look suspicious Is and I quote. Is suspicion a misdemeanor or a felony? Because unless you have another reason for trying to stop me I'm just going to go and continue on my way. Out of the couple of times no one stop me yet because the First amendment community is actually working a little bit in my area

  4. The cops are terrible. Makes me ashamed to be a former LEO. They should all be fired. Poor judges is a major problem in the US. The judge needs the police to be re-elected. These officers were tyrants. I hope he appealed . The police should also serve time in prison. They are thugs. The LT searched in the back pocket without a search warrant violation the Terry decision.

  5. Walking into a bank wearing a ski mask would not be suspicious if it was 20° below zero outside, whether his was openly carrying a gun or not — therefore it's the wearing of a ski mask when it's not cold out that would create the suspicion, not the presence of a gun..

  6. "we investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong"

    cops hate cameras. Cops hate the right to remain silent. Cops hate the 4th amendment, they want to be able to arrest anyone they want and search them, and they want to be able to steal uh oh "seize" anything they like.

    Then they wonder why we get defensive and don't want to talk to them.

  7. Wrong. Officers don't deserve an F if the court sided with the officers. This guy and anyone doesn't get a B …he deserves an F if they left the house, went down to the police station JUST to cause a problem or situation. ALL auditers get a grade F if they "make up" or force a situation.

  8. I hope he sued the police. The officers are ignorant, intimidating, harassing, a citizen on the public sidewalk. The illegal search and seizure, the prevention of filming, are all violation of his civil rights. Take it to a higher court as judges like to go with the police department. I believe he will do better in a higher court as locals court go with local police.

  9. So if the person stands in public and waits for cops to come and the cars drive around all day with their license plates exposed, you would think suspicious would be hidden.

  10. You need to stop acting like the courts makes any of this ok. They’re just as corrupt as the officers and allow what’s happening to happen. They are also in violation of the constitution, which is why I can’t stand you citing them as if it matters. I’ve seen courts, knowing an officer lied, uphold and charge people with crimes they didn’t commit. There’s a litany of people sent to jail and charged for crimes that never happened based on what an officer has said. When a court knowingly allows someone to be charged for crimes they didn’t do then there’s a deeper issue with the justice system

  11. Yes, I always record myself commiting crimes. Because that's the smart thing to do, and make myself perfectly visible to everybody.
    Give me a freaking break! How AtA starts this off rubbed me the wrong way.

  12. So they can take his camera for really nothing , but just on the way they feel, so the law doesn't mean anything, you could never expel a cop curiosity, because it's about their feelings , no one can change the way somebody feels if their sad you may get them to smile , but that doesn't mean their not sad just because they smile , so there's no law, so the Constitution and the bill rights should called, The Bill of Feeling and case law should be case feeling, and the officer should feelings Enforcement,

  13. After watching the video, the officer who went into his pockets outside of an arrest absolutely violates his right. And making a legal activity a crime was also a violation of 42usc1983. He needs to file with a federal court and not a local district court which almost ALWAYS sides with the officers.

Leave a Reply