Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

Passengers are often indirectly involved in traffic stops and asked to produce identification by the responding officer(s), but are they required to show their ID? Find out more about passenger’s rights in this episode.

Twitter: https://bit.ly/2XxjNwo

Sources:
https://bit.ly/2Xzyosd
https://bit.ly/2S5nILU
https://bit.ly/1zmoxUY
https://bit.ly/2XBiL3E
https://bit.ly/2G5agCV
https://bit.ly/2NKbR7C

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complimentary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

31 thoughts on “Do Passengers Have To Show ID?”
  1. Thanks for joining us for another episode! I'm working on a full length documentary on modern policing and informed citizens. Let me know what you would like to see in that video in the comments below. Cheers!

  2. SUPREME COURT RULED, A PASSENGER NEVER HAVE TO SHOW ID, THOSE COPS A SHAME FOR THE UNIFORM, NOW EDUCATION AT ALL ,,,,,,A PASSENGER ONLY CAN FORCE ID ORE STEP OUT IF SEEN IS A SUSPECT FOR WHAT EVER , 4 JUNE 2004 BY SUPREME COURT

  3. Physical abuse by a police officer is a serious violation of constitutional rights and can lead to the loss of qualified immunity. If an officer uses excessive force or engages in physical abuse during an encounter with a member of the public, they may lose qualified immunity if a court determines that their actions violated clearly established constitutional rights. Courts assess the reasonableness of an officer's use of force based on the totality of the circumstances, including the severity of the alleged crime, the threat posed by the individual, and whether the individual posed an immediate threat to the safety of the officer or others. If the officer's use of force is deemed excessive or unjustified, they may lose qualified immunity and be held personally liable for their actions.

  4. Everyone should be required, on threat of federal prison and a seizure of assets, to identify upon request. Such requests should be lawful orders. If you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hide, and if you have anything to hide, you should be punished.

  5. I belive your wrong about they don't have to tell you what crime they have you on just I'd . That is wrong they lie all the time . They can use that all the time to I'd . There for they can't with hold till the court room they have to tell you. Or its kidnapping and none lawful. Why cops get no respect at all .

  6. The driver and passenger can refuse DUI testing, actually. In no state can they penalize a pre-arrest refusal to do sobriety testing or breathalyzer. Post arrest, you likely need to do breathalyzer or face a license suspicion or warrant for blood test.

  7. You don't have to produce an ID unless you're a driver. You may have to provide your name, date of birth, and address, but not an ID.

  8. 'Begging the question' is a fallacy of formal logic, i.e. circular reasoning where the premise is assumed in the assertion. You meant 'brings up the question…' It might be worthwhile to get your expressions correct if you're going to offer information on important civics topics like this video of yours does.

  9. You also have the right to defend yourself against cops that assault you without breaking the law and false arrest. Bad Elk vs u.s government 177u.s 529 (1900).

  10. So, let me get this straight. Cops can lie during an investigation. Cops can compel you to act contrary to your constitutional rights if they deem your actions suspicious. Cops can lie about what you have done to justify claiming you are acting suspiciously. Cops can claim they feel unsafe to justify assaulting you. Cops can lie about feeling unsafe.
    Judges, knowing cops are trained to use lying to "investigate" suspects, choose to believe them and take their words as evidence.
    Prety much sounds like cops can do whatever they want, and walk all over your rights.

  11. They can ID the passenger if they make an arrest on the driver for something other than a driving-related offense. If they simply ticket the driver for speeding, failing to signal, etc., they cannot legally demand ID from the passenger.

  12. The deck is stacked in favor of law enforcement so it is best to invoke the rights that citizens possess such as the 4th amendment protecting from illegal searches and seizures and the 5th amendment which protects against self-incrimination and gives us the right to remain silent. If stopped by police as a pedestrian or a passenger you should invoke these rights by name to have it documented that you knew and correctly asserted your rights. Any actions by police after you assert your rights could cause them to lose their “qualified immunity” and subject them to investigation and discipline.

  13. What if your a passenger in a single vehicle car crash. Slid into a ditch. Do they have the right to ID you as a passenger when no crime was suspected

  14. I was broke down on the highway and a trooper came up lights on asked me what I was doing.i explained what was happening and was waiting for a tow truck. He said hurry up and get the fuck outta here . True story. Then they wonder where the hate comes from.

  15. And be polite when they club you over your head when you're walking around a white hood while being black or brown.

Comments are closed.