Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes only and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://bit.ly/2k0PcFU
The Free Thought Project’s channel: https://bit.ly/1MsEU51
Sources:
https://bit.ly/2m1z5c1
https://bit.ly/2kgzFSF
https://bit.ly/2lY0aMZ
https://bit.ly/2lF91D1
https://bit.ly/2kjchnD
https://bit.ly/2lxxaeY
https://bit.ly/2m0AShn
https://bit.ly/2lye7RE
We're so close to 20k help us get there! Thank you all for the support!
I can’t listen with this guys voice
I remember when I was jogging in the middle of the night in the Bronx in the 80’s. I couldn’t believe that some cops driving by stopped and put the big spot light on me. I kept jogging like I had not noticed a thing. I felt like it was something out of a movie. I remember having thoughts of taking off full speed just to mess with them but even at 15 I knew they would chase me down and brutalize me for making them burn off those excess donut calories.
That is Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law.
I notice a big difference in justification further stops between the old narrator and the new narrator. Too many other videos done buy honestly honest state that yes ARS is needed but yet this narrator says ARS is NOT NEEDED. .
Racist so called officer that's all that is
To be fair, jogging is suspicious… why you getting all sweaty for? 😂 ok just my laziness talking there.
Afraid of exercise… adding that to the list.
The law 15-2-30 that you posted says that they may demand the "name, address and explanation…"
The statute does not state that he must give ID, only that he must give his name and address. It does not even state that he must give his surname, DOB or anything else.
Core grievance of Black South Africans under apartheid was being stopped by Police with a demand to show their papers ("Pass laws".)
When they keep say make sure u get that on video u know it bothers them
Im leery of government functionaries knowing so much about me.
….guy keeps saying “and you can get that on video.” what an idiot, obviously everything is going to be on video when the guy is recording with his camera phone.
Your country is so primitive it's ridiculous
You as a citizen is not allowed to lie to the police. The police are allowed to lie to you. So why should a citizen trust the police?
He was guilty of contempt of cop. He was obviously mad about being recorded
0:30 is pretty reasonable for a late night jog.
Cops seem to be stupid .
Officers don't have integrity, just a perceived authority over everyone
All his ID is going to tell him if he has any warrants
All tyrant idiots know its a crime to look suspicious!
Im sure that this cop can show us where its now a crime to be a law abiding citizen!
Go ahead!
Where is it?
how is a time of day unusual?
Don't give two shit what you want
Even though we know this guy is just jogging, do yall realize that this is EXACTLY how someone would act if they were in fact engaged in criminal activity?
5:20 – Suspecting him of a crime absolutely DOES MATTER when it comes to demanding his identification and detaining him (variable by state)! He only has to identify himself when there is REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION that he has committed a crime. Now initially, If he's running in a high crime area at night that might be suspicion of somebody running from robbery or some other crime. But once he detains him, he has to have reason to identify him! And the cop CLEARLY stated there is NO CRIME HE SUSPECTS HIM OF COMMITTING. There is a reason auditors ask this question.
Yeah that's why I don't run…cause I'll get harassed. That's it.
Yea…..this idiot was being dumb from the start…….instead of the way he told the officer what he was doing……why didnt he just say he was jogging…..sat down to rest?…….im already within 2 minutes done with that dumbass citizen