‘Rust’ armorer convicted on manslaughter charge; Scott Peterson granted new hearing – TCD Sidebar

1. Following the recording of this episode, Robin Howington was convicted of reckless homicide in the shooting death of her 5-year-old daughter. Read more here: https://www.wate.com/news/knox-county-news/knoxville-mom-convicted-in-daughters-death-faces-minimum-of-15-25-years-in-prison/

2. The Innocence project is a national organisation with a very good reputation. The LA innocence project is an entirely different group. They may not have the same standards in respect to which projects they take on.

3. Way to go, Josh!!

   Tampon Hall is the absolute BEST!!

   Ty

4. It’s very off-putting for Tamron to constantly turn the conversation back towards herself. 😑🤨 Did y’all know she wrote a book?! 😳

5. Sorry not into Tamara, never was❗️ This interview was un enjoyable bcuz of her self importance 😠🤮! Go away

6. Hi! Josh, and happy St.Patty's. I love that you had Tamran on, as your guest, you both are high caliber true crime reporter/journalists! and always enjoyable to listen to.

7. I am honestly very curious to see how the Scott Peterson thing plays out because I have known about the innocent project a long time and I have looked into a lot of cases that they have helped reverse due to innocent people being put in prison and I have also seen them turn down a lot of cases because of people that said that they were innocent but after going through all of the evidence and reviewing it it was clear that they were the guilty parties so they did not take the case. They are not people that just take on a case they look thoroughly into it before they take it just to make sure that they're not putting themselves in a position where they are wasting their limited resources on a guilty person.

   In my opinion and it looks like other people believe the same thing I think Scott did it as well but I also will say to it would be very interesting if we end up finding out that there was evidence to prove the whole time he didn't do it and we have just looked at everything wrong this whole time.

8. Well if they are going to discuss Baldwin's cavalier behaviour because of aiming what supposed to be a prop, then what about the US government allowing access to guns with real ammunition? This clearly is more reckless. Baldwin is an actor playing a cowboy. How on earth was he supposed to behave to portray the character. If he was flipping the gun and just knocked someone's teeth with it, yes, that could be considered reckless because it would have been forseeable, but discharge of live ammunition on set was not. We know that he did not, accidentally or not, hit anyone with the gun regardless if acting as an actor or a producer. We know for sure though that legislators are aware of the danger of guns and failed to protect Halyna by making live bullets (deadly weapons) wildly available to civilians, and it was forceeable, and knowing statistics of death, premeditated because they have not stopped distribution and sale by now, having the knowledge of deadly consequences of use of weapons.

9. Correction: being an armorer wasn’t her only job. She was complaining about the dual role.

10. The conduct of the jury alone should have gotten Scott a new trial years ago.

11. The Innocence Project wouldn’t take the case on if they didn’t think the guy was truly innocent, especially a case like Scott’s….. The fact that so many people are STILL screaming “MURDERER!” Truly terrifies me. Cheating POS? Absolutely that doesn’t make him a killer. Open your eyes people.

12. Scott Peterson did this I hope he rots in jail!

13. Ugh!! This case is not being taken by The Innocence Project!! This is taken up by the LA Innocence Project, which has only been around for a couple of years. Please STOP trying to deceive the public with this misinformation.

14. Tamron, love your show! Didn’t know you were from DFW! So sorry about your sister

15. Unpopular opinion: I do think Baldwin should be held accountable. He was aware firearms were going to be used, he shot the firearm that killed someone, it’s involuntary manslaughter. We all know it’s a dangerous weapon, he should have used caution. It shouldn’t have been pointed at anyone. When someone chooses to get behind the wheel after drinking and accidentally kills someone, they are held accountable. Same thing.

16. Anyone else get unreasonably irritable when someone goes on and on so much? I think he dissociated while she was rambling, I know I did.

17. Love to listen to your shows Josh!

18. That strawberry shortcake apparently lied during voir dire , i believe he did it , but justice must be a fair & righteous process. Unlike the current fbi&doj which will prosecute you based on your political or religious beliefs (as we see daily).

19. Dont believe anything from the innocents project now…the literally push freed murderers as rehabilitated when he has body parts in his freezer

20. I heard that it was a different innocence project. This is the LA innocence project.

21. True crime Halle Berry… Love it

22. A 2 year old can shoot a gun? then make it so that he cant get too it because you are responsible when accident happens with that gun, oh and i tried to shoot my Beretta with my pink but i couldn't, so i have my doubts a 2 year old can shoot a gun, the ones who did shoot a gun were older.

23. Oh the Irony. Baldwin and his Big 👄 about Guns. Telling Americans they don’t have the right. Sad that a woman was killed but it is very ironic it happened to Baldwin. Guns are okay when he is making a movie but not responsible Americans? GTFoH

24. Oh great it's Brandon Lee all over again…rest his and his dad soul

25. No self-respecting firearms handler ever says, I should have checked the gun closer.
    You clear the weapon; open the action and show everyone around you. They also check the action themselves.
    No live rounds around- ever. Not in the same room, not even in the same building. That “armorer” brought shame to the profession. Despicable.
    I’m waiting for Baldwin to be held accountable.
    Both defendants are unlikeable.

26. Wished Tamron Focused more on the story at hand. She spoke more about her own stories. She could have mentioned the Dyeing of his hair, trying to escape, also what the little said.

27. If Baldwin gets out of this, that just shows money, fame and power will always win. That man has needed to be locked up since the 90s.

28. Damn! How many time does she go back to a fictional book? Girl stfu and stick to the facts and not your fictional fantasies.

29. I can’t believe Crime Watch Daily didn’t clarify it is NOT ‘The Innocence Project’ that most people know about but instead it is ‘The Innocence Project of Los Angeles’ which has no affiliation with the regular innocence project!!!

30. Either way the mother is still at fault because the 2 yr old could access the gun at all.

31. As much as everyone loves to hate him, the fact that the innocence project is representing Scott Peterson means they have good evidence. They don't just represent anyone.

32. Why were there live rounds on set at all? I read somewhere that she brought them from home. It defies logic. She deserves more than 18 months, she should have known how important and serious her job was.

33. The defence used the "burglaries in the neighborhood" argument in the first trial. There's nothing new about that angle. They must have found something more in connection with that angle that we don't know about. Even so: He told his mistress that he was a widower with no children. A very much alive ex wife and a child would be impossible to hide from the new woman in his life. Once he had told Amber that lie, he had to make his lie about being a childless widower come true. Amber never believed in his innocence once Lacy went missing, and nobody had a better insight in this case than she did.

34. The shameless amount of book plugs one can do 🤷🏽‍♀️🤷🏽‍♀️🤷🏽‍♀️🤷🏽‍♀️

35. Illuminati sacrifice. Youncant convince me that Baldwin didn't know.

36. Whose finger prints were on those bullets? This whole time I thought it was like a bucket of prop ammo but that was very meticulously placed. Just by glancing you could see something isn’t right when there’s a clear distinction between the live ammo and prop ammo. Someone intentionally placed those there, that’s no accident.

37. "How are you today, Tamron?"
    "Well in my 9th book I tell the story of a woman who had a really nice day…"

38. The Peterson trial update is so ridiculous.

Comments are closed.