** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **
San Mateo, CA – San Mateo Police Department released more information regarding an officer involved shooting that occurred on Saturday, September 28, 2019, at 5:19 P.M. San Mateo Police Department officers were involved in a shooting in a cul de sac at the end of East Hillsdale Court following a short pursuit. As the suspect vehicle drove toward an oncoming police vehicle and then reversed toward an officer on foot, one officer discharged his service weapon. Two suspects were injured in the shooting and officers rendered medical aid on scene before the suspects were transported to a local trauma center for treatment.

Donate to PoliceActivity: https://www.patreon.com/PoliceActivity
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PoliceActivity
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Police_Activity

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

35 thoughts on “Bodycam Footage Of Officer Shooting Retail Theft Suspects in San Mateo, California”
  1. The first set of shots weren't needed since the officer wasn't even near harm. The rest for the backing up I could see being justified but still. Stay behind a perp in a vehicle trying to get away is the same as cornering an animal, it's gonna be dangerous and unpredictable so maintain distance since idk your pistol or rifle can easily reach the target without needing to be 2 feet on em while they operate a 2 thousand pound vehicle. Not anti cop, just anti retard, common sense is much needed. Watch alot of these shootings an honestly jumping in front of a moving vehicle doesn't seem smart. Jus gives the cop the right of passage(and his other officers) to shoot down whoever is in it.

  2. Oh yea let's just shoot them cuz they are driving away. I don't see the guy that shot first in any type of danger. He was far away from that car. Nd not even close to getting hit. He was trigger happy. Probably never shot anyone so he decided to shoot someone that day.
    Fucking pigs.

  3. I’ve seen animals have a greater understanding of logic and reason than these people.

  4. I love how police in US have a right to do it. In my country gun usage is so restricted that the cop would go to jail if they shot at the driver.

  5. 2:26.
    Her – I am shot
    Officer – no u r tall
    Epic
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  6. (┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(┛✧Д✧))┛彡┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻(┛ಸ_ಸ)┛彡┻━┻┻━┻ミ\(≧ロ≦\)┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻┻┻︵ヽ(`Д´)ノ︵┻┻(╯ರ ~ ರ)╯︵ ┻━┻

  7. I do not believe the police officers had the right to shoot that man in this video. The guy did not drive directly at anyone, nor did he have any sort of weapon besides the vehicle. IF he did actually drive “at” an officer, I can see justifiability. Not here, un-justified. It was most definitely hostile intent, yet it was not a hostile action.

  8. The cop that originally shot is a dumbass, I love seeing criminals being executed but dude was just running, fuck that cop I hope he sees real action soon in favor or the perp. Pussy

Comments are closed.