COLORADO SEC OF STATE WANTS US CHARGED WITH VOTER INTIMIDATION – Everything Law and Order Blog

LINK TO THE FULL AUDIT VIDEO – CLICK HERE: https://youtu.be/nlMpgD6QQJI

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

40 thoughts on “COLORADO SEC OF STATE WANTS US CHARGED WITH VOTER INTIMIDATION”
  1. I am absolutely sure there were cameras mounted to the outside of that building filming the people driving up and voting. Intimidation in my books.

  2. “They have a constitutional right to vote”

    Gun = constitution right
    Record = constitution right
    Dress freely = constitution right

    Sounds like a constitutional party.

  3. It's Crazy how they Used Specific Wording to Escalate the Situation and make AP & WTW seem Menacing and how they Made it Look like the Police RAN You Guys off.
    SOO SOO SAD HOW FEAR IS BEING USED AGAINST THE PUBLIC to MANIPULATE THEM.
    GREAT WORK AP & WTW KEEP IT UP.
    THANKS

  4. How can it be illegal to exercise several of your constitutionally protected activities at once than to only exercise one of them. I just don't get her logic. It seems to me it should if anything be the opposite.

  5. This is like saying I'm a criminal buying the last cheese burger at mcdonalds. You can't be a criminal for being a law abiding citizen.

  6. This lady is a joke… how the heck do these ppl get into that position? She wants to protect ppls rights, by taking away other ppls rights? Let that sink in…

  7. I detected gas lighting… this is why some people don't need to hold an office position based off feelings.

    Their constitutional rights were the same as amagansett 's. He had a camera in hand, not a weapon. Especially the words "military fatigues" and "tactical gear". Wtf…

  8. When idiot woman, Asherry, says, "These laws are vague unless it's really overt…" she's actually saying the law is VERY SPECIFIC as to what constitutes the violation and tyrants HATE THAT. It's why most laws ARE vague and can be applied broadly. The worst offenders of this is Fish and Game laws.

  9. Did the ‘offender’ drive to the scene? That would be suspicious! What if they walked unaided to the door? That would be very suspicious!! What if they didn’t have written permission from their Mum to be out by themselves? ……….

  10. This can’t be real. There is no way someone that stupid could hold a job and the sad part is the news actually ran this. Has the whole country gone insane!

  11. I don't understand a word she said nothing is illegal what they had done yet she was trying to make a case against them poor show these people can't be trusted false news she couldn't get right what they were wearing what a snowflake ❄️ time to go

  12. "2 men dressed in military fatigue/clothes!" "Tachrical gear" "intimidating voters" I've gotta check this out! Oh, it's a minor wearing shorts and a t-shirt…

  13. Wow she was pretty stupid to try and convict someone for a 1st amendment right! I’m guessing by now, she knows how ignorant she really was.

  14. jenna griswold MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T ASSUME SOMETHING SO RIDICULOUS! Men wearing certain clothing, armed with cameras and exercising their rights means something nefarious is taking place!

  15. No intimidation + no intimidation + no intimidation + no intimidation = intimidation. Only a politician could reach that answer

Comments are closed.