original video:

Robbins v Des Moines Case No 19 2492 Oral Arguments

_______________________________________

SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXJixv1PeVLEF7yitWWeJNQ/join

https://www.paypal.me/johnnyfive00000

PLEASE COME CHECK OUT MY MOST RECENT VENTURE:
https://johnny50.com
$25/year founding membership rate.
exclusive, uncensored footage that i cannot show here on youtube.

MERCH:
https://www.cafepress.com/johnny50
________________________________________________________

SOCIAL MEDIA AND CONTACT:

johnnyfive00000@gmail.com
JOHNNY FIVE 0 LIVE:
https://www.youtube.com/c/johnnyfive0LIVE
https://tiktok.com/johnny_500000
twitter:@johnnyfive00000
https://www.facebook.com/Johnny50FilmsPolice/
instagram.com/johnny_five_0
_______________________________

Mailing Address
11304 Chandler Blvd unit 6016
North Hollywood CA 91603

GAMING CHANNEL
https://www.youtube.com/c/MajorOwnageGaming

_____________________________________________________________________

If you want to find your way back to this channel, hit the subscribe notification.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Disclaimer: Viewers to this Channel may post views and opinions in reaction to my videos. Any content, views, opinions and/or responses to questions uploaded, expressed or submitted by the creators, sponsors, advertisers or users of YouTube, including on its web pages, message boards and groups or otherwise communicated through it, other than the content provided by Johnny 5-0, are solely the views, opinions and responsibility of the person submitting them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Johnny 5-0 and is not responsible for content that third parties publish, post, upload, distribute, disseminate or otherwise transmit via YouTube. Unless otherwise specifically stated, all content, images and video are copyright ©2017-2021.

#1stamendmentaudits #copwatch #DUICHECKPOINT #lapd #losangeles #johnny50

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

27 thoughts on “DES MOINES POLICE CONFISCATE CAMERA AND CELLPHONE”
  1. 8Th Circuit appeals court decision summary (QI denied on 4th amendment claim) :
    01/05/2021 Daniel Robbins v. City of Des Moines
    U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-2492
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa – Des Moines
    [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
    Civil case – Civil rights. Plaintiff's actions in filming the entrance to
    the police station and engaging in confrontational behavior went beyond
    any constitutionally protected recording activity; defendants' actions,
    when combined with the defendant police officers' knowledge of vehicles
    being vandalized and stolen in the area and their personal knowledge that
    a previous filming incident led to the murder of two officers, could cause
    an objectively reasonable person in the officers' position to suspect
    plaintiff was up to more than simply recording police; the court cannot
    say the officers' conduct was objectively unreasonable under clearly
    established law, nor in violation of the First Amendment; defendants are
    entitled to qualified immunity for the Terry stop they made because they
    had at least arguable reasonable suspicion given their knowledge of past
    incidents and plaintiff's evasive and uncooperative behavior; however, the
    officers lacked probable cause for plaintiff's arrest and they are not
    entitled to qualified immunity on his claim for false arrest; under the
    facts of the case, the government interests did not outweigh plaintiff's
    possessory interest in his phone and camera; the warrantless seizure of
    the items violated plaintiff's clearly established right to be free of
    unreasonable seizures of his property, and the officers were not entitled
    to qualified immunity on this claim; no recognizable Monell claim exists
    as the evidence is insufficient to show the kind of deliberate
    indifference needed to establish liability.

  2. If the court system actually worked in "We The Peoples" favor this guy should be set for life with a lawsuit against this nonsense!!! ABSOLUTELY DISGUISTING!!

  3. This dude did this to himself. He needs to learn how to talk to these people. An auditor that knows what they're doing may have gotten out of that. Tyrants at their best. This guy needs to do more studying before he tries this again because these pieces of trash will do this every single time.

  4. This video, right here, is why people don't trust them. At what point will they realize how many of us are seeing this shit?!? It's the bad pig's making it extremely messed up for the good. It's sad. Challenge authority?!? I will pray daily that you get dealt with accordingly, may Karma stryke you the fuck down man! #scum

  5. Johnny I went over and listened to the judge on appeal with Robbins VS Demoines and I can't find if he won any settlement after his appeals, any info would be appreciated.

  6. Such dumb ass cops in Des Moines Iowa. They must have a hick police academy out in the middle of some cornfield. This citizen's Protected Constitutional Rights we're violated big-time! To seize this photographer's camera without a warrant for doing Public Photography on Unrestricted Public Property! And then trespass him from public property even though he did nothing illegal. These ignorant cop should lose their Qualified Immunity and be sued personally.

  7. Yea, I have to give credit when it's due. I appreciate all the good auditors. I'd be face down with possibly broken bones after a couple well placed "your mom/wife" statements.

  8. Someone should do a records request of the report on the mentioned bombing and stolen vehicle reports, bet none of that happened. There's a sizable check waiting for these blatant Constitutional violations

Comments are closed.