US Soldiers/Marines conducting anti-tank training. TOW missiles fired from M41 Sabers mounted to the turrets of Stryker Combat Vehicles. Video also includes shots with the LAV-25 (Light Armored Vehicle), M1128 Stryker (Mobile Gun System) and M1126 Infantry Carrier Vehicle.
M1134 Anti-Tank Guided Missile Vehicle is a US armored fighting vehicle from the Stryker family of vehicles. As the brigade’s primary tank destroyer system, the ATGM reinforces the brigade’s infantry battalions, reinforces the brigade reconnaissance squadron and provides long-range direct fires.
â–ºSubscribe Now — https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT4layPPCzgR_99g5VYYvmQ?sub_confirmation=1
** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **
loaded manually???
The striker almost looks similar to the BTR.
Now try on the move while tank fires back
بوركتم وبوركت يلا سنتðŸ‘ðŸ‘ðŸ‘ðŸ‘
Eeek. Ye olde LAV-AT with the even older Emerson ITV TOW turret.
Elst egt lal hte udm eplpo htat rae odign udm hsjht egt a ohdl fo lal iseds DD-214
isn't this a new gen lav?
Every time the spendagon creates one of these frankenstein multi purpose weapons systems, they are ineffective and a waste of money.
Hit & run in a fair number were used in Syria to test them in a true strangle of combat to find out how stand up of course newer models I'm sure are more solid & can penetrated thicker armor but that of course is a military secret .
La France va bientôt avoir mieux
The Stryker is pretty much the AR15 of American "Tanks".
Fully customizable and capable of "Fully semi automatic"
many years ago a one ton dodge with a 37 MM was coined as a tank killer ……that didn't work out too well either ……wanna kill a tank via vehicle…..call for a bigger tank
Pretty effective… if you can get it to work
u niaru spara?
How dare they use a Centurion for target practice
If you only knew how shitty these trucks are..
The Philippine DND Officials and AFP Generals are M113 addicts because there are lots of money that would be earned from refurbishment and upgrades of this absolete APC.
Праве задне колеÑо ÑпуÑтило, Ñкщо хто помітив)
Los
ok guys strykers are not meant to be frontline vehicles they're mainly used to get soldiers to places quickly so don't expect a stryker platoon to go up against any tanks
AKA "TGST"……"The Get Stuck Truck"
Vs russian terminator tank….. Stand no chance … Just get fried like chicken ..
Love those Gen2 LAVS
Rip centurion
Diferencias entre el Stryker y el LAV
No thanks! Give me the 120mm cannon, Syrykers!!!!
good demonstration, now use it against PAKISTANI TANKS so that the WORLD could be a BETTER living PLACE
ок
Why can't they just add the tow launcher to most stryker variants, like with most Bradley varients? This thing has no weapons besides a tow launcher, while a Bradley has a cannon, machine guns and the same launcher. At LEAST give it more launch tubes instead of only two, otherwise this just seems like such a waste of a vehicle
Looks like fort Carson
These will d3stroy any russian tank
Russia has many more tanks than the United States but these armored vehicles are no joke they come in many different models to perform different tasks and most of them can easily take out a tank and they're very fast so any country with a large tank Arsenal should worry
Better to make the enemy watch this video then sneak past after they've fallen asleep!
How well does it work against modern tanks with reactive armor like the Arena?
nothing new i worked on these systems in the late 80's
No Show anything joust Thema notheron
Then look at Russian Hrizantema tank killer ….
Millions of dollars worth of hardware an no tin snips to open the boxes !
So they tested to supplies isis in syria 😉
Meenwhile in (not soviet) Russia they have Kornet EM Tank destroyer system which is able to fire 2 kornet missiles at diffrend targets. The system is able to fire 4 rockets at once (2 for each target) and has 8 missiles ready to fire. Range: up to 10 km.
This is scary shit. And no, I'm not Russian troll. Their system is just waay better.
The striker was made to move infantry to the battle field. The striker is for protection same goes for the Bradley IFV. Our Army needs to take a hard look again on Russia's IFV family of vehicle murdering bad asses. The Russians equip thier IFV's with every gun or missile ya can put in those types of vehicle frames. Thier shit is just mean and rugged. They use thiers to fuck any standing enemy in front of them to the fullest. I like our striker but it looks weak in my opinion.
Maybe some tin snips would be easier
Good to know we can blow up an AMX just in case we go to war with France or something.
0:56 looks like a sti in front of it is that what it is
Los
þú