M1134 Strykers Coduct Live Fire Anti-Tank Training – Everything Law and Order Blog

US Soldiers/Marines conducting anti-tank training. TOW missiles fired from M41 Sabers mounted to the turrets of Stryker Combat Vehicles. Video also includes shots with the LAV-25 (Light Armored Vehicle), M1128 Stryker (Mobile Gun System) and M1126 Infantry Carrier Vehicle.

M1134 Anti-Tank Guided Missile Vehicle is a US armored fighting vehicle from the Stryker family of vehicles. As the brigade’s primary tank destroyer system, the ATGM reinforces the brigade’s infantry battalions, reinforces the brigade reconnaissance squadron and provides long-range direct fires.

â–ºSubscribe Now — https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT4layPPCzgR_99g5VYYvmQ?sub_confirmation=1

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

44 thoughts on “M1134 Strykers Coduct Live Fire Anti-Tank Training”
  1. Hit & run in a fair number were used in Syria to test them in a true strangle of combat to find out how stand up of course newer models I'm sure are more solid & can penetrated thicker armor but that of course is a military secret .

  2. many years ago a one ton dodge with a 37 MM was coined as a tank killer ……that didn't work out too well either ……wanna kill a tank via vehicle…..call for a bigger tank

  3. The Philippine DND Officials and AFP Generals are M113 addicts because there are lots of money that would be earned from refurbishment and upgrades of this absolete APC.

  4. Праве задне колесо спустило, якщо хто помітив)

  5. ok guys strykers are not meant to be frontline vehicles they're mainly used to get soldiers to places quickly so don't expect a stryker platoon to go up against any tanks

  6. Why can't they just add the tow launcher to most stryker variants, like with most Bradley varients? This thing has no weapons besides a tow launcher, while a Bradley has a cannon, machine guns and the same launcher. At LEAST give it more launch tubes instead of only two, otherwise this just seems like such a waste of a vehicle

  7. Russia has many more tanks than the United States but these armored vehicles are no joke they come in many different models to perform different tasks and most of them can easily take out a tank and they're very fast so any country with a large tank Arsenal should worry

  8. Meenwhile in (not soviet) Russia they have Kornet EM Tank destroyer system which is able to fire 2 kornet missiles at diffrend targets. The system is able to fire 4 rockets at once (2 for each target) and has 8 missiles ready to fire. Range: up to 10 km.
    This is scary shit. And no, I'm not Russian troll. Their system is just waay better.

  9. The striker was made to move infantry to the battle field. The striker is for protection same goes for the Bradley IFV. Our Army needs to take a hard look again on Russia's IFV family of vehicle murdering bad asses. The Russians equip thier IFV's with every gun or missile ya can put in those types of vehicle frames. Thier shit is just mean and rugged. They use thiers to fuck any standing enemy in front of them to the fullest. I like our striker but it looks weak in my opinion.

Comments are closed.