A Former Cop Challenged These Reckless Police Officers – Everything Law and Order Blog

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhL7lY60h0g

Real World Police’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChaEeYV0iibwFqrmFYTweVA

Sources:

United States v. Landeros- https://bit.ly/3vWc5tD

Brown v. Texas- https://bit.ly/3p1SKDr

Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada- https://bit.ly/3nYdxIV

Nighttime Glare and Driving Performance (NHTSA)- https://bit.ly/3AdF51M

Fla. Stat. § 316.233- https://bit.ly/3rUhznM

Fla. Stat. § 843.08- https://bit.ly/3fyEr7c

United States v. Alvarez- https://bit.ly/3yr9QQD

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

31 thoughts on “A Former Cop Challenged These Reckless Police Officers”
  1. The cop knew that they had no reason to stop him in the first place at all. The cop could’ve caused an accident for no good reason.

  2. The cop is lying because you can’t estimate a persons speed when they are approaching you it’s not possible according to physics. This cop has no idea how fast he was moving. The passenger doesn’t have to identify unless the passenger has committed a crime. Why did the cop 👮‍♀️ shine his light into the car from the opposite side of the road.

  3. This looks like profiling to me. Especially when he asked for every passenger’s ID and it sounded to me (not 100% sure) that each of them were black and he was white.

  4. Cop blinded driver in order to see race & then choose to illegally pull him over with a speeding excuse in order to arrest the occupants. Cop is lawless & racist.

  5. I blinded you with my spotlight, so I could see what you looked like, so in case you were going to speed away, after I stopped you because I'm guessing you were speeding, and I'm pulling you over for speeding. Good Lord. These cops keeping getting worse, and their justification for illegally pulling over people, harassing, detaining, arresting, assaulting, and worst case killing innocent citizens who have not committed any crime. God help us!

  6. The officer is lying about the PC for the traffic stop. In the middle of the night it is almost impossible to estimate the speed of an object moving toward you. I feel that this was racial. Every stop I made needed to be justified because you are seizing the individual at the beginning and the constitutional rights are applied from the first second.

  7. What's the point of having the Second Amendment to defend us against foreign and domestic Terror including tyrannical government if no one uses it

  8. What is the point of having the Second or even the First if we're not allowed to defend ourselves let alone talk about it? Meanwhile rambunctiousness and aggressive behavior fueled by ill-advised opinion and corruption seem to be the most acceptable way?

  9. I have to say that I have a massive amount of respect for the driver and his passengers, and I think cops like the ones who pulled this man over should have to face some kind of consequences for bogus stops.

  10. He shined his flashlight into a moving vehicle to look for targets. He's targeting colored people, plain and simple.

  11. I think that officer should have received a much lower grade. Blinding on coming traffic, demanding passenger's IDs and lying about the vehicle speed. To me it seems like a D- at best!!

Comments are closed.