Alex Murdaugh’s Jury Tampering Claims Called ‘Defective’ with ‘Factual Disputes’ by Attorney General – Everything Law and Order Blog

Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers filed a motion for a new trial after allegations of jury tampering surfaced in his family murders case. The South Carolina Attorney General responded to the filing, calling it “defective” with “significant factual disputes.” The Law&Crime Network’s Angenette Levy breaks it down.

Reporter:
Angenette Levy: https://twitter.com/Angenette5

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

32 thoughts on “Alex Murdaugh’s Jury Tampering Claims Called ‘Defective’ with ‘Factual Disputes’ by Attorney General”
  1. If the clerk actually did what she was accused of then we all deserve a fair trial its not about is he guilty or not its about our justice system, that is the law, your right to a fair and just trial..

  2. Why is heaven’s name is a state senator still defending him? Isn’t he double dipping?? What about his obligation to the people who are paying him ridiculous money to do something besides his elected job?

  3. I hope he gets a re trial. I think he’s guilty as sin but that clerk more than likely really said that stuff out of emotion for the victims and that’s not what she’s supposed to do

  4. I still think AM has some dirt on JG and DH because why else would they be defending him like they are?
    Whoever the third man is at the press conference he was trying to stop Harpo from dropping himself in it 😂 unsuccessfully 😂

  5. Why anyone would take anything that this defense team claims "happened" as factually happening is beyond me…
    After all, this is the same defense team that hired an "expert" to say there was no way Alex could have been the shooter because the shooter had to be under 4 feet tall! Get real!
    Its not as if the members of this defense team are so righteous that they are not willing to defend 1000% percent guilty people, and proceed to stand behind experts who make up rediculous theories to try to show just how "innocent" their client really is.

  6. It's quite the leap to infer that her referring to "we" means her and the jury, and even in the case that she did mean the jury that doesn't mean she actually communicated with them about it. If they are basing this on "exchanging looks" then that's another big stretch to say that means improper communications. Are we going to go back through all cases to judge the looks that clerks might or might no give juries, does then a lack of a look mean they infer innocence? C'mon now.

  7. Seems to be a battle of technicalities. I doubt someone as experienced as the clerk would make such a grievous error, it's possible of course but it's extremely hard to take the defense's claims at face value.

  8. Evil runs in his family DNA ,of course he didn't do it ,the wife and son are not dead ,he didn't fleece his clients life's savings and he's not a drug addict .The lawyers are spineless they are a disgrace defending the indefensible.

Leave a Reply