Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.
NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.
Details: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2023/10/31/breaking-4th-circuit-denies-judicial-immunity/
Prior Video on this: https://youtu.be/f9duAPB9SwI?si=mLURiX8ADDOPK9XZ
Link to oral arguments: https://www.youtube.com/live/MUSzSlDJfYM?si=DwERWzGHWwctX2JN
silent collusion by the police officers and the Bailiff…
Her authority is out the door constitutionaly by this home invasion under color of law. Her attorney should be disbarred as well knowing this action was illegal.
To protect and defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.
Thank you so much for defending our God given freedoms
Good job
This has to be the coolest thing you have done. You have single handedly opened case law to judges getting sued. You are a legend.
WOW THAT IS NUTS THEY ALL SHOULD BE FIRED DVDs CDs YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING ME
How is it we get no exceptions for our ignorance of the law but they try to give them to a judge?! For thee and not for we is the truest statement ever!
That sheriff is a whimp butt k——-
Is the sheriff going to be fired to
Truly effing ridiculous
She's judge dredd
In a Fictional movie the American President. This is the actual meaning of Andrew Shepherds Speech.
🇮🇪🇪🇺
Britain has *Flat lined *
JRM's timeline 50 year's + is still ticking. 47 year's and 112 day's to find those Elusive Brexit benefits
🇮🇪🇪🇺
She still have her job she's an absolute tyrant
Im very disappointed that she hasn't been crimimally charged. She had no more right to invade that home, making threats to deprive that man of his freedom under color of law, than a crimimal, unknown to the victim, just breaking into and entering his home, overpowering, binding, and gagging him. She actually has MORE criminal culpability than any random criminal unknown to the homeowner.
I wasn't ready for you lighting the cigar with three hundreds. That is a different level of diabolical. I, for one, am here for it all!
This is so grotesque. If that judge thinks she has that right, she's stupid or insane or both. She should be in prison.
when the judicial branch decides it wants to be the executive branch lmfao…
ah ok good she's a former judge now, god bless lmao
Immunity implies protection against the repercussions of your actions, even if it causes harm to others.
That means being above the law. It's tyranny.
Qualified immunity justifies violence against police.
Judicial immunity justifies violence against judges.
if she's still a judge, then that's insane. Absolutely insane.
how can she be expected to uphold the law of the land if she either obviously doesnt know the law, or she actively disregards it herself, in vindictive manners?
If they want to illegally enter your premise activate the 2nd amendment
Right on ! A real lawyer!
These cops and Judges represent the good old boys days, when the local so called law enforcement think they are all mighty. Then the real world looks up and says wtf.
Congrats, well done.
All cops are trash
Unconstitutional. No search warrants.
Its clear this judge is one sided and is doing all she can for another woman including breaking the laws of this land …
This judge needs to be disbarred and forced into retirement..
Man this is a good example how to pick a woman!
When you have a woman going through dvds and pictures all that crap could be avoided by saying take everything and I will raise again from this mess.
I did that with my ex now I got more that she can even think