Can Voice Stress Analysis Lead Law Enforcement to a Killer? – Pt. 2 – Crime Watch Daily

| by | 10
Can Voice Stress Analysis Lead Law Enforcement to a Killer? – Pt. 2 – Crime Watch Daily

Timothy Johnson’s murder may have never been solved if not for a revolutionary technology that helped cops catch the suspects in a lie.

Check your local listings at CrimeWatchDaily.com.

source

Share this post

Recommended for You

10 thoughts on “Can Voice Stress Analysis Lead Law Enforcement to a Killer? – Pt. 2 – Crime Watch Daily”

  3. @marck8899 · Edit

    Lots of questions regarding polygraph. It and the CVSA are scam props. See the links:

    https://youtu.be/ROhp2aS9pQU

    https://youtu.be/dsufvxgLf0g

    Eye Detect, pupil dilation is also the latest of these scams. There is no Pinocchio 🤥 effect when a person lies. These industries are making huge profits scamming us all. The USA 🇺🇸 Supreme Court, in an 8 to 1 majority opinion, 1998 US vs. Scheffer, ruled after exhaustive study and debate, that the Polygraph is reliable as the “toss of a coin”. The Pentagon also came to the same conclusion with the CVSA.

  4. @marck8899 · Edit

    Anyone doing Polygraph or voice stress analysis test are committing crimes against humanity for bearing false witness with gadgets incapable of delivering what they promise, accuracy. Polygraph is a SCAM industry. They can use it to scare confessions out of suspects who believe they actually work. In other words, if you believe in polygraphs, chances are you’ll be scared and confess to what they’re trying to shake out of you. There is no Pinocchio 🤥 effect when a person lies. Your nose doesn’t grow if you lie. Using physiological responses such as pupil dilation, heart rate, pulse, breathing and sweating activity or voice stress analysis test also do not have anything to do with corroborating truth or deception as the Polygraph Industry would have you believe. I took a polygraph once to settle a trust issue and was told I “failed miserably” even though I was being 100% truthful and should’ve passed with flying colors. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled, that the polygraph is as reliable as the “toss of a coin”. Had I known how flawed the polygraph industry is, and their operators being narcissistic POS, I never would’ve subjected myself to it. It was my idea to hire a polygraph examiner, not the other party. Since then, I have learned about the Supreme Court’s decision on banning their use to being admissible in courts of law, due to their extremely poor results. Also, I learned of these two resources available on YouTube here, one is Doug Williams Polygraph (a former Oklahoma Detective/polygraph examiner and now a crusader against their use), and the other is a 60 Minutes television episode taped around 1986. The 60 Minutes episode has Diane Sawyer and her undercover investigative team exposing the polygraph industry for being complete frauds. The episode is called “Truth and Consequences”. Also, the ABC News piece exposing the pseudo science of the NITV and its creator/founder. That episode is titled, “ABC News Exposes NITV CVSA Scam” with chief investigative reporter Brian Ross..

  5. @pandorasbox4238 · Edit

    VSA Has not been proven to be accurate, has not been extensively tested, and has no right to make any claims of accuracy. It is based off the same junk science polygraphs are and can be just as faulty. A test done on a small number of drug users alone recently shows it's accuracy to be about the same as a polygraph, too – no better than flipping a coin.

Comments are closed.