Closing Arguments in Wisconsin River Stabbings Determine Fate of Accused Killer – Day 8 – Everything Law and Order Blog

Intense closing arguments took place on Wednesday morning where both state and defense gave their reasons as to why they believe accused killer Nicolae Miu is guilty or not guilty. The jury is still deliberating a verdict. Miu is accused of stabbing a teenager to death, and injuring four others, while tubing on the Apple River in Wisconsin back in July of 2022. Isaac Schuman, 17, was killed and Rhyley Mattison, 24, suffered severe stab wounds. Miu is facing multiple charges including first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree homicide, and battery with a dangerous weapon. Miu claims he acted in self-defense.

Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

26 thoughts on “Closing Arguments in Wisconsin River Stabbings Determine Fate of Accused Killer – Day 8”
  1. If Miu gets less than 30 years, justice will not have been served. He proved himself to have had murderous intent and willingness to act on murderous impulses when retaliating for being pushed down, called mean names and laughed at. Not exactly a civilized adult's reaction: to attempt murder when he could have walked away at a point before all his little tin soldier friends and church lady Karen supporters say he was so helpless.

  2. Anyone who says the 17 year old group was in the wrong is absolutely insane. They never even attacked the man. They called him names. You’re a man who can’t take a couple chirps from kids?

    Also majority of the people who got stabbed and testified were not kids.

    They were from another group of 20-30 year olds. because every one at the lake knew there was a psycho harassing kids.

    his own friends were confused why he would go in a river looking for a phone. How do you expect to find a phone in a massive river and why would you ever approach a group of teenagers like that? lol

    Easiest sentence I’ve ever seen.

  3. It's real simple. A bunch of people surrounded and attacked Miu. Mui had every right to defend himself to the best of his ability. The fact they found him guilty is beyond belief. Let's see any one of the jury deal with the situation he was in and see what they think then.

  4. People. This is not hard. Teens should not drink and berate an adult. Adults also should not stab teens because they are bullying them. Both statements are true. Mui could and should walk away.

Leave a Reply