Cop Loses It Over Minor Miscommunication

1. Thanks for joining us! Be sure to stick around to the end of the video. It helps the channel grow and it helps you be more informed! Cheers!

2. Pinging for possible update vid! 😁

3. Someone really needs to start audit in the auditors. Add 1:40 in video the officer allows the guy to pass by no incident. Where was the narrator infizizing this point??????

4. Updates ????

5. Tyrant.

6. You've got to be kidding me. The deputy is a petty tyrant. Why are you making excuses for him?

7. I don’t get it the cop told me he could pass? He never even actually passed the cop? “Get the hell outta here” means u can go wtf😂

8. They kinda admitted it was retalitory when ge accused the cop of having attitude

9. You gave that fucking cop a C-??? Jesus, that cop failed. Some cops fail more than others – he still failed completely even if he didn't shoot anyone.

10. Seth McFarlane's Brother.

11. How would he talk himself into handcuffs by reiterating the REQUEST for a supaviza ??!!??

12. Another Audit where "all" parties should receive and "F" including the narrator. The citizen for purposely elevating the situation with his total disrespect and personal verbal assault on the police officer (he gets a B!?), and "reckless driving" which was caught on camera. The police officer for unprofessionalism and really not doing his job. Plus the Narrator for citing legislation that is not current and in some cases refers to statues in the 1980's! Which have been updated multiple times……Audit the Audit gets an F for it's ongoing poor presentation of these situations, when it should be a learning experience for all….ugh!

13. Some of these laws are so petty, a way to make money from a reasonable driver.

14. This is why peaking in high school is so dangerous

15. Kevin is my uncle I hear all about this at school

16. This very same thing happened to me. The officer was stopped on the side of the roadway. I used the open lane to pass, and he pulled me over. He proceeded to yell at me because I failed to yield. However, from my perspective, it didn't look like he was blocking off all the lanes. He was simply sitting on the side of the lanes with his lights on. I figured he had just finished a traffic stop. Anywho, I got a good scolding and was let go. The police can be confusing 😅

17. The cops tires squealed a lot more than his did. The cop had told him to go, he was just butt hurt.

18. The cops tattoos at 1:49 are so bad

19. Another autist who wants to be a big man, Its come to my attention that cops will either completely leave you alone or will purposely want to set you/someone up for a bad day.
    Edit: it wasnt a full barricade and all police barricades must have signs and lights, being on the wrong side of the road isnt a police barricade, its a traffic violation… As aduit said, it could be argued in the corrupt officers favor but its null and void when you see the fasion of the false barricade and the officer said go free, thats exactly why he let him go.

20. Tactical gear

21. This cop does not have the temperament to be a police officer

22. Wow that cop spun his wheels just to catch up to a non threat

23. Cop get's a D. He only semantically didn't violate the guys rights. The cop kept misrepresenting the facts and there is no doubt in my mind that the stop was retaliatory. The man was in complete control of his vehicle. I don't think that improper start law was meant for a little slippage. Imo it was not an overt violation of that law, the cop just wanted to go on an ego trip and humiliate the guy.

    Like others have commented, the cop even said "get the hell out of here," and pointed. So the guy did. Cops shouldn't be provoking behavior that they then cite or arrest someone for.

24. I find it ironic how much the "fear for their safety" if you get out but normally they say step out "for officer safety" im confused are you safest with me in or out of my vehicle

25. 1:43, the moment the cops ego got hurt, a high criminal offense in every state. These are the highly trained cops that we need to de-escalate situations. 🤔

26. New Yorkers are such obnoxious tools

27. I listened to his car go about 5 times and I never heard him squeal his tires. However, I heard the cop squeal his tires when he went after him. Maybe I'm losing my hearing faster then my eye site???

28. He did not squeal his tires.

29. oh dear god, those "X vs Y" are killing the mood, I am giving up on these videos: NOBODY IS INTERESTED, SUMMARIZE !!!!

30. ATA his tires didn't screech. only the cops did

31. Get out for ny safety!
    Get back in for my safety!

32. Yup…..florida

33. Tire screeching a reasonable suspicion of a crime ? Yes, it is arguable. But common sense says he screeched his tires because he was annoyed by the stop and interaction, had a bit of a chip on his shoulder.of course the cop had a chip on his shoulder as well.

34. Watching these videos is like picking a scab, it’s painful but you need to know

35. ATA and the C- is why I downvoted this video. If the cop had received an F I would have upvoted. The driver did nothing wrong or illegal and the cop was an A-hole tyrant.

36. “Can I go?” “Yeah” and then he pulls him over again immediately…

37. That cop didn't get a F after threatening to arrest someone for telling him off after issuing improper tickets?

38. The tires didn't even screech. Deputy Lapointe should have received an F because he had no probable cause for a second stop.

39. Cops aren't there to protect you

40. Deputy needs to refill the toilet paper in the Women's room

41. Why do police escalate so tremendously and suddenly?

42. Wow, the legal system is so incredibly broken. Peeling out is not the same thing as the tires barely squeeking. If thats the same thing as "peeling out" then cops are the exact same thing as the mafia.

    The cop was significantly more unsafe and was harassing people. He also didn't have any real probable cause, just manufactured probable cause from a legal system that is corrupt, broken and trash for allowing law enforcement to do whatever they want.

43. On king David

44. Sentence of the supreme court of a free country ,on the crime 337 Criminal Code "resistance to a public official" 

    1) citizen commits no crime by refusing to carry out an officer's order.
    -That is, those who do not facilitate police control operations and do not obey the officers' commands such as, for example, opening the hood of the car, raising their arms upwards to allow the search, those who refuse to unbutton their jacket or those who do not want to open their suitcases for a normal check.
    Or, another example, those who refuse the request to get out of the car, or those whoto refuse to take a breathalyzer test either. Although this will be considered a positive alcohol result.

    2) There is no crime of resistance to a public official when the citizen engages in passive resistance.
    -This is the case of someone who, upon realizing that the police are arriving for a check, runs away somewhere else (think of the street vendor who, at the sight of the officers, picks up his stuff from the ground and runs away because have not license);
    –or to those who, having glimpsed a checkpoint with their car and having left their license at home, make a U-turn. 
    -or who, at the police checkpoint, simply escapes by car, provided that without maneuvers that endanger people's safety and without committing other crimes envisaged by the penal code.
    -Expressions of threats addressed to the latter do not constitute the crime of resistance to a public official, when they do not reveal any desire to oppose the performance of the official act, but rather represent a form of contestation of the previous activity carried out by the public official.

    This is the concept of law and overall for the concept of free and submission of the citizens in a free Country… 
    No one person have the authority to compulsory order any action to other person. With the exception of a reasoned and motivated order from a magistrate. Or the hierarchical superiors over subordinates, in the military forces,
    In a free country the words of the police have the same power as the words of a doctor or a professor or any citizen.

    Would it be possible for the US supreme court to rule something similar on government authority? I highly doubt it

45. lol b455

Comments are closed.