Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

39 thoughts on “Cops Confront Upset Woman | In HER Driveway | Shoot 10 Times!”
  1. She was wrong AF. This wasn't an exigent circumstance? I don't understand how her civil rights were violated. The police actually viewed a video and saw the suspect with the knife in her hand. They had an RAS, right? What part was wrong?

  2. also why do they say shots fired with not saying who did the shooting it should be a different saying for if they did the shooting vs. otherwise, they come in guns a blazing thinking they're being shot at

  3. they cops really need to identify and explain themselves immediately if they are truly just doing an investigation…she wasn't aiming at any cop she was trying to get away from them.

  4. I don't think the cops should be shooting guns in this one, UNLESS she was trying to run the cop on the lawn down. If he thought he could stop her by stepping in front of her car, then that was his bad judgement.

  5. Granted she would have hit the officer if his partner didn’t grab him. She didn’t so I think shooting at her was excessive force but what do I know…

  6. Looks like the uneducated dumb as a faking stump police have done it again. Insane that you don't need a degree to be a cop. Most everything else of importance requires it. Why not this?

  7. The cop got stuck on "Mimms" why couldn't he just let the woman sit in her car?, i bet if she did get out he'd tell her to "take a seat" anyway . so chalk up another one for mimmsy !

  8. The cops are at fault. They never try to de-escalate things. For whatever reason the woman didn't want to get out of her car. Big deal. She is sitting there with no weapon and isn't going anywhere. Why can't they ask their questions with her sitting there? It's all about a power trip for these cops. They only need to grab her if they decide to make an arrest and she still refuses to get out. At this point there was no reason to have her get out of the car. She wasn't going anywhere. Now the woman is to blame too. I can't imagine why she would be trying to call someone when the cops are trying to talk to her. Unless it was her lawyer or maybe dad to talk about the cops being there. I don't think any crimes were committed until after the cops got there. The cops were not threatened and had no right to shoot at her. The woman was acting bizarre and probably having mental issues but these cops were on a power trip. They should be fired. Cops should never shoot at a car in a urban area like that unless it is absolutely necessary. Bullets can hit bystanders or ricochet and go anywhere. This was not necessary. They knew where she lived and they probably had her license plate #.

  9. Seems many cops are psycopaths. Psycopaths like to work in places where they can have some power over other people and make them suffer. Like in the government and big corporations, military, also surgery doctors..

  10. Cops use the old “they were trying to run us over” BS for a long time, but when cops jump on hoods, or intentionally get in the way makes me think they just want to shoot. In this case I don’t even think she saw the cop in the yard. On the flip side this chick is nuts. Once she was fleeing down the road those shots were not necessary

  11. Are we watching the same video??? The car was pointed in and moving toward his direction. This shoot looks to be an awful but, lawful shoot. The totality of circumstances leads me to understand the position of these officers.

  12. You can't just pull a knife on someone in there yard looking for your dog which probably just got loose accidentally. And expect not to answer to police. The entitlement never ends 😅

  13. Honestly I think she didn't care if she hit one of the officers. From one policeman's cam you can see the one who shot first getting out of the way. Bad lady very entitled acting…

  14. Hello. I believe that the officers had the right to use deadly force, but only when the car was traversing the front lawn and the officer was evading it. After the car sped down the street, the officers had no right to fire at the car.l

  15. at 12:55 she clearly had her vehicle pointed at the officer and accelerating. I usually see good info on this channel but here it is clear that she was at the least a fleeing felon. She had brandished a deadly weapon at 2 people after breaking into their backyard, then refused a lawful command to exit the vehicle, which there is RAS that she is armed.

  16. The problem as far as I am concerned is where did those 10 rounds the officers fired wildly, go? I could easily see one of those rounds going through a wall and killing a child. Yet, there is never a mention of where those rounds went, or if the officers even bothered themselves with a consideration of their backstop when they unloaded.

  17. It would seem to me they really overreacted in this situation. Firing a gun in a residential area seems quite dangerous. They caught her after she was shoot, wouldn’t they have caught anyhow without firing a shot luckily no serious injuries. If one those shots had killed her I would think there would have been a lot of regret on the officers part and something would had to live with the rest of their lives.

  18. I am a retired cop. Our dept policy said you could not fire at a vehicle or from a vehicle. They could have spent a little bit more time talking to her before they escalated to pulling her out of the car.

Comments are closed.