Go to https://tryfum.com/AUDIT and use code AUDIT to save an additional 10% off your order today.

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDbAUZym9I0

Lofe’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Lofe

Sources:

Minn. Stat. § 629.37- https://bit.ly/48Gf7WU

State v. Esquivel- https://bit.ly/3LNyl34
U.S. v. Wallace- https://bit.ly/3LOdlcw

Minn. Stat. § 609.343- https://bit.ly/3rHegoo

Minn. Stat. § 609.341- https://bit.ly/3rO15Sm

Minn. Stat. § 609.02- https://bit.ly/3RGfY3U

Minn. Stat. § 609.50- https://bit.ly/45kJnUg

State v. Krawsky- https://bit.ly/46HaKsZ

Turner v. State- https://bit.ly/46EIiYu

Lollie v. Johnson- https://bit.ly/3Q2XHfY

Navarette v. California- https://bit.ly/2Nzuo6W

Minn. Stat. § 609.224- https://bit.ly/3Q647uT

Minn. Stat. § 609.605- https://bit.ly/48DQ4ns

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid- https://bit.ly/48IqLkg

Hudgens v. NLRB- https://bit.ly/3tkLQAZ

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

31 thoughts on “Cops DEFEND Citizen From Corrupt Security Guards!”
  1. That person is exactly what is wrong with their perspective "movement". They are always the victim and will constantly create up fake stories to back up their victimhood.

    Where are the charges for the attack helicopter for the false allegations?

  2. False Police Report / False Report of a Crime can be a high charge This offense is a misdemeanor and may result in up to six months in county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both a fine and imprisonment. You could be charged with a felony if you committed this offense in addition to perjury or fraud.😂😂😂😈😈😈☠

  3. Where was the corrupt security??? These guys are openly walking around bothering people and calling them pranks, and then get mad when they are being bothered by security for investigating an accusation. The securities DID NOT ACCUSE, they clearly state that they were ACCUSED by someone else. They could of easily ended this entire matter without any drama. These guys are a bunch of pussies. And this video is a weaker presentation of what this channel has put out before.

  4. major problem in our current society is people believe literally anything a woman says when it involves sex crimes
    security was 100% on their side without even listening to the opposite side

  5. Initial False accusations of sexual assault should result in the falsely accusing party to be charged with a felony at the same or higher level then what their allegations could carry if they were legit as well as being personally sued by each member they accused individually. That’d teach these western women to quit playing the victim card and walking away freely

  6. LIke 90% of the comments – I hate "youtube" pranksters. But they actually handled themselves really well – and it didn't end like 99% of the Universal Studios Orlando Vids – with them being hauled off in cuffs. They did not in any way, shape or form Sexually Assault either of those two "young ladies". Was accusing them of cutting in the waiting line to pick up kids off the ride the best move in the world? No, but nothing illegal happened. Kudos to the cops who probably get called to Valley Fair way more than they need to for listening to both sides and rightfully determining no law was broke here. The security guys from Valley Fair get a D in my book. They assumed guilt immediately, but they didn't go full on universal studios with them – allowing them to walk to the parking lot and get in their car without staying in their face saying get off our property. "2 white guys and a black male". And for the record the "black male" was not even with the youtubers. (Yes, I thought it was him initially but I went back and looked again – it wasn't him – pink shirt but completely different logo. Even the youtuber thought it was his pal)

  7. These guys give 1st amend auditors a bad name They ask for trouble and when they get it they cry to the cops. I see no good guys here at all
    Youtubers ,security the girls or the cops all included

Comments are closed.