Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/
Freedom is Scary STEAK RUB! https://quiggysbbq.square.site/product/freedom-is-scary-eat-steak/25?cs=true&cst=custom (Discount Code: LAWYER10) – 25% donated to the Institute for Justice
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.
NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.
DETAILS/Case Documents: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2025/01/07/cops-mistakenly-send-k9-to-attack-innocent-sleeping-man/
Derrick Williams was fast asleep in the apartment he had been living in for about a month (which was leased by a friend/Uncle) when he heard a commotion outside his bedroom. It was the Chesterfield County (Virginia) Police Department, who had just opened the front door and sent in a police K9 to find him and violently attack him. But it was a mistake. He had done nothing wrong. His friend/Uncle's ex-girlfriend had come by earlier to collect some belongings, saw him asleep in the apartment, and called 911, believing he was an intruder of some sort. Instead of realizing that Derrick was not an intruder, they just went full send with their attack K9, to bite first, and ask questions later. Now a lawsuit has been filed. But the cops are asking for qualified immunity, claiming they did nothing wrong.
must be nice to be so bad at your job and you get to laugh about how bad you are since you know nothing will happen to you for being bad lol.
was the ex-girlfriend arrested for the false police report?
I'm surprised they apologized
Now see this is a good example of why I think dogs should no longer be used in the police force, they are used WAY to much and they are way to unpredictable and they do not listen, with all the technology these cops have at their disposal these days, the government really has no business still using K9's, I don't think they should even be able to use K9's on like a traffic stop because a lot of these officers just watch the dog and any little movement the dog makes the officer then goes "oh he is showing me signs that there may be drugs in the car!" when all the dog did was just do regular dog stuff, it would be acceptable to use K9's in EXTREMLY rare situations like bomb sniffing or drug sniffing at like a border but not an everyday police officer, that is just so unbelievably asinine. also one thing I think should happen is IF they use a dog to sniff a car on a traffic stop ( these dogs are used to "legally" get around the constitution ) and claim that the dog gave them the sign there is drugs in the car and then they search it and find NOTHING then there needs to be SEVERE consequences for all officers involved, I have seen to many times that an officer will do something and then that officer and other officers talk about it for like 20 minutes to decide what to "charge" the person with and make sure they all get their stories straight, which is BS I also believe that officers should not have control over their camera, it should ALWAYS be recording and when they turn the camera in someone else OTHER than that officer should be in charge of pulling the footage off the device and it should go to an offsite server that none of the officers has the ability to erase or modify the footage. OH! also we need to get Qualified Immunity to be abolished, see how NONE of those officers were concerned about the mistake they made? its because they know nothing is going to happen to them ( because most of the time it is kind of rare that they see any meaningful consequences
Sorry I don't think he has a case against the cops. Against the ex girlfriend absolutely. It sounds like she was there when the cops arrived and if she still had ID showing she lives there the cops could not assume anything she said is not true. Sue the girl not the cops.
So, if we believe that a person is going to do us harm, we can use force to prevent such a crime against us, even if we are mistaken, and we will not be prosecuted for our actions?…
In what kind of justice system do we allow police to sic a vicious dog upon an unknown unseen person? This HAS to change!!
LAW ENFORCEMENT IS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC!
That officer will strike again
He didn't get bit by a dog he got bit by a weapon
This is what I heard. “Lease kay-9, speaktahme now, Lisa dog. Yall fine ah get bit”. I’d be like, what the heck is happening out there? Hell no, I’m not going out there! There’s a drunk burglar at my door!
Sorry. We’re sorry. So sorry, our big ass dog chewed on you for a while.
Prison for life traitors
The Thin Blue Line strikes again!
You should have to have an IQ above room temperature in order to be a bad cop…
Nazis
Seems like the officer has a history and pattern of using unnecessary force…
Since the canine is considered an officer of the law, wouldn’t there be a ton of violations committed by a police officer. Excessive force, actions unbecoming an officer, failure to identify (unless the dogs names is Ruff), etc.
It seemed to mean that the District Attorneys nationwide are no damn good. "They support all civil rights violations and police excessive force" means that a group or individual is actively condoning any actions by law enforcement that infringe on citizens' civil rights, including the use of excessive force, essentially advocating for a disregard of basic human rights and legal protections Civil rights violations:
This refers to actions by authorities that infringe on fundamental rights guaranteed by law, like freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and equal protection under the law, often impacting marginalized groups.
Excessive force:
This means using more physical force than is reasonably necessary to detain or control a person during a police encounter, which is considered a violation of the law. Hey evil Hypocrites this is for you Galatians 6:7 says, "Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked, a man reaps what he sows.". This verse essentially means that people will experience the consequences of their actions, and that God cannot be fooled by attempts to live a sinful life while expecting positive outcomes.
Key points from the verse:
"Do not be deceived": Don't be misled or fooled into thinking you can escape the consequences of your choices.
"God cannot be mocked": Trying to deceive God about your actions is futile.
"A man reaps what he sows": This is a metaphor for the idea that the actions you take will have natural results, good or bad.
What ever happened to doing an investigation FIRST. Absolutely mindblowing that the police aren't even admitting to what they did.
Imagine if a child was sleeping while you release a dog wow
We need to require 85 minimum IQ scores to become a cop .
The woman basically had him swatted. She should be charged for every single part of this incident.
So apparently Anyone can call and say a burglary is Happening at any address and there is a burglary and cops are justified to unleash a vicious k9 into whatever address anyone wants. Boy, this sure seems like swatting to me.
What if that dog latched onto a child? Freaking cops now a days have no freaking integrity, dirtbags plain and simple.
What's crazy is if one of our dogs did that to a cop they can shoot it and the cop be fine(Hell cops murder innocent dogs for barking) but if a cop dog attacks us and WE do that, we get charged with murdering a cop. This is animal abuse!! I do not condone harming animals in any way. You see my point though.
How many more citizens need to be injured, disabled, killed, and falsely jailed before the police are listed as a public health and safety threat?
Imagine being dead asleep in REM then loosely hearing from across your apartment "Poice Kn, Speak to me now, ileasee doog, dog fiindssyu bebbit". He literally said gibberish, no way anyone understands what he is saying coming into that apartment.
Cops don't believe ANYONE unless it gives them a justification to use violence. Then they will take any info given and run with it like it is a fact.
Warrant less entry. Doesn’t matter that it was a dog. The cops had no authority to enter the home so they had no authority to release the dog into the house
Cops send dog to bite innocent citizens: "Oops."
Innocent dog even barks at a cop: (pew pew) & arrests the owner.
So the "lady" called….these "females."
Belgian Malinois are Psycho and even a psycho cop knows better than to try to introduce that animal to a family. Like with them, it usually ends in someone's suicide, death, or tragedy. They were bred and trained for war. This is not war.
police need to be retrained and they should never be permitted to use force or violence unless force or violence is being used against them first, ever, because they've proven to be absolutely irresponsible with the power they are given.
Police dogs are a human rights violation and should be banned.
Unless they're like a cadaver dog they have no reason to have dogs.
Imagine if there was a little child there! They could have had a mauled and dead child.
Some people can sleep through earthquakes Using the dog to go after a suspect is illegal. Canines should be outlawed their training is bullshit they're trained to a specific alert signal.
Couldn't the police have simply waited for the so-called thief to leave?
Frauds aka traitors
Military tribunals
Domestic terrorism
WHY DO COPS ALWAYS BELIEVE A WOMAN? Without getting any answers or information first?
Police are abusing people and dogs! Dogs need to be banned from police work period!
This is exactly how they are making America great again. Hope everyone is proud to be Americans and proud of law enforcement because this is what your tax dollars are paying for.