Cops Violate Man’s Rights After Karen-Call – Everything Law and Order Blog

Check out https://guard.io/TCRL for a 7 day trial and 20% off your subscription + the ability to protect 5 family members from hackers and scammers!

Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967

Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/

For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com

Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

44 thoughts on “Cops Violate Man’s Rights After Karen-Call”
  1. How did this guy not keep asking “what crime do you suspect me of committing” instead of “am I under arrest”. What crime did I commit? Suspicious activity. What charge is suspicion? Crickets. Am I free to go?

  2. It's like watching a wrench stuck in gears. The police officer cannot handle a simple repeated paradoxical response.

    'Am I free to go?' —– 'No.'

    'Am I being detained?' —– 'Yes, at this time.'

    'Have I done anything illegal?' —– 'No.'

    'Then why are you detaining me?' —– 'Your doing something suspicious by looking in peoples cars.'

    'Is that illegal?' —– 'No.'

    'I'll leave if they want me to.' —– 'We're finding out now'

    'I'll leave, Can I leave?' —– 'No.'

    Repeat.

  3. This repeating of "am I free to go" is a little bit silly. 😂
    I understand he hasn't done anything and they need to leave him alone… but repeating himself isn't going to get him anywhere with them. 😂
    He should be saying "this is unlawful detainment w/o RAS"

  4. A person commits the offense of forcible detention when he holds an individual hostage

    without lawful authority for the purpose of obtaining performance by a third person of demands

    made by the person holding the hostage, and

    [1] the person holding the hostage is armed with a dangerous weapon.

  5. I like that he keeps asking the question to verify what status is the encounter with the police officers. It prevents the opportunity for vagueness and at what point the officers make it clear to the citizen that things have changed. Great tactic.

  6. The Super is only trained to stop at ever fast food drive through in town as he rides and slams down cheese burgers. I'll bet he can run the 100 yrd dash in an hour. This "Protect and Serve" fatty is free to go to the nearest heart surgen.

  7. Why do these glorified corporate security guards presume to have the right to get your private information when they receive a call, yet many times the callers haven’t been identified.

  8. What is the right thing to do? You hear that in one state only a rear license plate is enough, and here in Texas there must be front and rear license plates. What if you come from a state where only one license plate is allowed, but are now visiting or passing through another state? Will you be penalized for only having one license plate?

Leave a Reply