Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDTFsy9Kl28
Update videos:
LackLuster’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia
Flex Your Rights’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Flex_Your_Rights
Sources:
Articles-
https://bit.ly/4aXU57q
https://bit.ly/4aQcGCl
https://bit.ly/41VoP4R
Wright City Code of Ord. § 217.010- https://bit.ly/3OqpTZ5
Wright City Code of Ord. § 217.015- https://bit.ly/3tS3nB1
Texas v. Johnson- https://bit.ly/3CRAe8K
Cohen v. California- https://bit.ly/2OMM14a
Garcia v. City of New Hope- https://bit.ly/3Sj8Kld
U.S. v. Thompson- https://bit.ly/3u2IQd0
U.S. v. Williams- https://bit.ly/3O2aBte
U.S. v. Jacobsen- https://bit.ly/42eQhLb
Wright City Code of Ord. § 310.020- https://bit.ly/3O2ppIn
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 300.080- https://bit.ly/3tUBmJc
Wright City Code of Ord. § 210.390- https://bit.ly/48T5Ny9
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 575.150- https://bit.ly/3tLbwYa
State v. Steward- https://bit.ly/3TYKKGa
Be sure to check out my second channel! I'm try to get it to 100k and I need your help! https://www.youtube.com/@johnlang6593
Excellent job in assigning the grades to everyone, that’s the first time I’ve ever thought that completely in every way❣️ thank you❣️
Wow, quite a situation. Makes one pause and think about the importance of integrity in law enforcement!
DON'T WATCH THIS VIDEO. IT'S A WASTE OF YOUR TIME. THE CASE IS STILL PENDING.
Takes a special kind of communist scumbag cop to drive around and search for ways to violate people's rights over BS ordinances
Officer malted milk balls is a shining example of why training needs to be, at least, 2 years, with mandatory testing on constitutional rights, before they are allowed on the streets.
The Good thing is that they Refunded him for the Tow, and THIS is the way the cops are Supposed to Respond
Beard was fired and a federal lawsuit filed.
I like how the lieutenant is agreeing with him and dude is still arguing.
Collective knowledge! Is that the same as plotting a conspiracy?
The police don’t like if they are disrespected. They knew that they didn’t have any right to pull him over when he a actually got upset because they were upset because they got but hurt and it’s literally legal so they didn’t like for the police to violate the first amendment. How can you get arrested when it’s legal for doing a lawful right. The cops in that town is to totally wrong and the community that tried to get the man tried to violate the constitution
The police don’t like if they are disrespected. They knew that they didn’t have any right to pull him over when he a actually got upset because they were upset because they got but hurt and it’s literally legal so they didn’t like for the police to violate the first amendment
This cop was but hurt because the driver gave him the finger. Which is not illegal. This was an illegal traffic stop.
Cop sounds high ASF
Lt. Matthews deserves a raise! What a fantastic officer! More cops like him would make policing MUCH more healthy for public–police interactions.
Fired and imprisoned minimum 1 year for every minute of the stop.
Trump!
You are done!
I don't care where it goes!
You are fucked!
And this country is corupt!
What factors were considered before concluding that the arresting officer's actions were in fact corrupt and absurd?
Cry baby liars
I'd give Matthews a better grade than C+. He did the right thing by dropping the charges and refunding the money Mr. Hall paid out. I'd provide Matthews a Solid B.
Dirty cops once again
This might sound like a foolish question, how do you keep track of laws and local ordinances? How can a town or county add an ordinance just to make money when that action is a protected right?
The ordinance seems to state “inoperable”. What constitutes “inoperable” exactly? If the vehicles CAN start and drive but don’t have registration…would they not be “operable”?
middle finger is free speech still .
Some of these cops are such losers. Did they get beat up a lot in school, is their manhood extremely small, do they still live at home, in their mom's basement? Some of these guys are such cowards, such wimps. They become cops so they can get a badge and a gun and bully citizens to feel better about themselves. These losers have no right to Qualified Immunity.