CRAZY Store Security DETAINS a Subscriber! | Then Real Cops Show Up – Everything Law and Order Blog

Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

48 thoughts on “CRAZY Store Security DETAINS a Subscriber! | Then Real Cops Show Up”
  1. These security guards are probably not trained very well. The fact that this guy (who harassed the woman who's filed the lawsuit) was dressed like that is bizarre. Surely they have protocols? Apparently not.

  2. As a 43 year veteran of the security industry and the Fire Service I see numerous problems with the security company (IPS) and this supposed security guard. #1- he is not wearing the company identification patches on the sleeves which all states require to differentiate them from real police. His so called uniform was obviously self purchased as well as all the other items he was wearing (Bad Ass Rambo mentality). #2- The company put him to work without the proper state certification and with no to little training. Contract security companies are notoriously known for this process of filling a contract with a warm body just to get paid for the contract. #3- I put all the fault for this incident on the Walgreens Corporation and the Store management personnel for hiring this company and then not verifying that the assigned security guard (he is not a security officer without the proper state certification) met the state certification standards and training. DO NOT ever accept the contract security companies word on certifications, demand verification records.

  3. The investigation to this point shows that Walgreens team leader Mitarius Boyd, 21, was notified by another employee that two females were stealing items from the store. Boyd said he saw the women placing items into a store cart and into a large over-the-shoulder bag. Boyd said he began recording the women with his cell phone and followed them as they exited the store without paying for the merchandise. Boyd said as the women began placing items into the trunk of their car, he made his way to the rear side of the vehicle. He said one of the women pulled a can of mace and began spraying it at him. Boyd said he then pulled his semi-automatic pistol and began shooting, saying he was in fear and didn’t know if they were armed. This woman was actually stealing and maced him while he was filming. She def could of had a gun or knife anything. This wouldn't be happening if they were not rampant stealing at walmart. They realize they can't do it anymore and now want to sue walgreens after being caught on filim stealing. After the woman was out of the hospitals people said she was back at other stores stealing again haha.

  4. citizens arrest. If someone said they saw her stealing that is evidence. They don't have to get involved with the situation cause they are not cops. So you can't bring that individual over cause that girl might attack them or something. So for their safety they don't need to be involved. I am a store owner. SAme thing chick saying she didn't steal my customer said she did. I locked door told her to empty her pockets or the police will do it. She refused my customer pulled her sweats down and all these merch came falling out. Its not they are going to admit they stole they are just going to deny it. Some random person is not going to lie and say you stole stuff for no reason. She probably grabbed some lipstick or something. Who knows but someone saw her do it and put in her pocket that he was sure that she stole something. her lawsuit would be with the person who accused her if she was not stealing not the security guy. The girl was resisting emptying her pockets for a reason. It was very simple to empty pockets so its no issues. Nope she just kept denying it like she had something in her pockets. She can't sue walgreens cause they didn't train that security. They hired him. She would have to sue the security company or sue the person that said they saw her stealing. That was the root of the problem or she was stealing and that is what caused all the problems. They think can in and steal cause they saw it on the news. Walgreens not having it anymore. Enough is enough. Stop stealing and you can shop at walgreens.

  5. She shouldn't wait for THEM to call the police SHE should have called the police.
    13:30 – They're talking about that particular franchise.
    14:06 – I'm not trying to defend Walgreens, but just because violent incidents happen at Walgreens Stores doesn't mean they tolerate it. It looks to me like certain Walgreens Stores need to do a better job at screening who they pick to act as security.

  6. Weird this guy either has a case of impersonating a police officer by having a New York badge or it’s stolen valor😂… imagine lying and telling someone you’re a cop is a good thing😂

  7. Thats a 1983 suit if I ever seen one. detainment without probably cause, acting with authority tied to their status as a peace officer (4th amendment). false imprisonment, abuse of authority

  8. This is a common thing by Walgreens. Once I was in the drink isle stuck my hand in my pocket to count how much cash I had to make sure I could get me and my brother a drinks. A store manager did this same thing. I looked at her with disgust and showed her I had nothing but money in my pockets and then she decided to kick me out anyway for "suspicious activity". 😒 Walgreens is a place either the meth heads go to steal or Karen's go to shop. Coming from an ex employee.

  9. A long time ago (20 years or so) when I was about 19 I worked as a loss prevention associate for Best Buy in Wisconsin. The only way we were allowed to stop anyone is if we saw personally the person concealing, carrying (without any interruption in surveillance), and watching them pass the last point of sale. Usually we waited for them to get to the door beepers but regardless of if they went off or not, we then made the detainment. It is actually state law that you must complete all those steps before a detainment can be made. You can't lose sight of them for any length of time because the merchandise could be dumped and you wouldn't see it. Another shopper or another employee could not tell you that someone stole, you could only start to watch them at that point and note if they do it again. There is enormous liability for bad stops and stores have paid out millions settling lawsuits (ask Walmart). Some businesses are better than others. Target, Best Buy, Sears, and others have pretty tight training on what is and isn't an allowed stop and if there is a bad stop they usually offer some kind of settlement on the spot for a signed release of liability. I never saw one of those, but there were a few in other stores. That LP officer is usually fired after two bad stops, but it depends on the circumstances and might be immediate. Bottom line, if you don't have well trained security, the liability isn't worth it. Some security is very professional and are highly trained. Some are even police that are moonlighting (Walmart is notorious for this). Many are armed, but most plain clothes LP are not. The well trained armed security don't usually work at malls or big box stores, but rather places like nuclear power plants, military contractors, or private personal protection. They are very often former military, hold a security clearance, and know what they are doing better than most cops. You average mall cop with a gun and 500 rounds at the range with a few hours of class time is not someone I would rely on if I were a business. You are opening up yourself to serious legal pain.

  10. While I don't think she stole anything, she might have, and we would never know. Walgreens would never know (unless they had video proof). Just as I said "Jones is a scumbag who charges too much" you showed the video of him in an orange jumpsuit.

  11. I love this shyt 💩
    Theres….🤷‍♀️ victims …bullies …Karen's 🧟‍♀️an corrupt extortion rings ran by the Blue Mafia an local 🤥 goverment ⚖️….waiting to meet me when i wake up …☕️
    Is every body 🤔 in this country totaly crazy 🤪

Leave a Reply