Criminal justice teacher speaks out about what killer learned in class – Everything Law and Order Blog

Robert Wells didn’t know it at the time, but his knowledge of his former criminal justice pupil Christopher Waide would soon make him a key player in the search for missing woman Lea Porter. More: http://bit.ly/3aPBlH9

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

32 thoughts on “Criminal justice teacher speaks out about what killer learned in class”
  1. People keep saying she was going to die anyway because she used drugs which is absurd.
    People can live a good life after drugs.
    It's not always the death sentence people say it is.
    I think it will be a life sentence in battling against it though.

    There are some amazing people who are ex addicts.

  2. It wasn't the police who caught Chris , if I remember correctly it was her brother who recorded his confession!! Maybe I'm mistaken but that's what I thought!! Poor teacher ,it's not his fault!!! The internet and crime shows is just as good as a criminal justice class!!!! Crazy world we live in now!!!! Rest in peace Lea ❤️❤️

  3. I don't get why everyone says only Christopher knows where she is. At 8:26 he says he "put her in the dumpster". They say he confessed again and again, so was that all a lie? Then why did they find all the other stuff at the landfill? Yes, it's definitely possible he was talking shit and did something else with her body. But isn't it also possible that she IS at the landfill and they unfortunately just didn't find her?

  4. I mean it sounds like what was taught or told as examples what was taught in the class was common sense and def not added education that helped make a killer better at killing. I mean he didn't even clean up the scene…most places WOULD say without a body a case can't be made or this ex. Blood sample. However imagine all the cold calous people who's still have gotten away with murder along with whatever other crime their sorry thought pattern to cover it up with murder…it'd be quite a few…. However there's something called circumstantial evidence. Secondly, if the victim has any family than DNA can be tested for familer (think I spelled it right) Ex. If both parents had their blood tested and DNA analysis done they would then compare it to the massive amounts of blood found at the scene to see how THAT DNA is linked to the DNA that was tested(ex used. Mom and Dad)
    Isn't it ironic when these people realize ooops, I can't get out of admitting a death happened at my hands so I need a good enough reason to have done it… Suddenly, stories change and they tell a tragic story of how they didn't want to bit feared their safety and it was their life or the victims. True they could have run out the door or in cases where the victim can be heavily outweighed, detain or disarm the victim…No,somehow it always results in murder from self defense.
    Self defense cases are hard to prove as is. You can't however decide that once your lies are coming to light and the evidence is showing murder that suddenly it was a self defense case.
    There's also the "accidental" killing that the suspect again,thinks they have outsmarted their crime and begin a new story This time how it was a tragic accident but A)person fell hard down the stairs n hit their head became unresponsive,died( the actual details and whether it all adds up is irrelevant at this point to the suspect B) in defending themselves with say a knife They merely got it from the suspect and had no idea the knife accidentally must have stabbed the victim. Suddenly the suspect realized the victim must be hurt after they become unresponsive.
    Again, these ignorant people could have used a class bc no one told them that an autopsy as well as official cause of death would probably make them look like a liar again.
    Just a PSA: if you have committed any range of crimes do remember this: committing murder so that you don't get "caught" at original crime is pretty stupid thing to do. You will get caught Even IF there is NOT a body, in this technology advanced society we live in, how likely is it someone just picked up leaving loved ones especially kids as well as leaving behind crucial items most people take to a grocery store much less a trip such as wallet,cell phone,debit cards…Just bc you INSIST THIS is what happened and the evidence shows otherwise it doesn't matter how long you please and bs.
    You would have been better off getting that original charge you attempted to cover up than most likely your life gone behind bars if not death penalty. Also, when committing crimes like burglary that then can result in murder of victim or even if there was someone with you who burglarized a home,the homeowners shoots n kills the other suspect, suddenly bc a murder occurred during the commission of a felony and most states will give the surviving offenders that murder charge along with whatever crime was being committed even though they in no way pulled the trigger ..so ask one self…Is the amount of money, the jealousy,the child custody (kids DO N WILL GROW UP WONT LAST FOREVER), retaliation of anger worth GIVING YOUR FREEDOM AWAY ON A SILVER PLATTER?
    NO Matter how much betters ones like can be I like to remind others "YOU are not worth losing MY freedom over". May not have much but you do have that along with your free will

Leave a Reply