Second channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhB-cnBBEM4

Ensuring Transparency’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl-2tnCvV4oFLsK0li4MChw

Sources:

Arkansas Code § 27-49-107- https://bit.ly/3craPri

Coughlin v. State- https://bit.ly/31q4Ixe

State v. Thigpen- https://bit.ly/3crbsRG

Hoffman v. United States- https://bit.ly/2O4Mkac

Ohio v. Reiner- https://bit.ly/3lWVZfi

Florida v. Royer- https://bit.ly/2N09XjA

Salinas v. Texas- https://bit.ly/31nyXF9

Riley v. California- https://bit.ly/3csS471

People v. Blakeslee- https://bit.ly/3tYrOXP

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

50 thoughts on “Dash Cam Saves Citizen From Lying Trooper”
  1. I can tell you to do anything i want and you have to obey me by law lol sound's like a tyrant trying his luck with someone who might not know better.

  2. This video always boggles my mind. The officer responds to everything that was said. And STILL trys to argue he needs it down more to talk better. Like the logic in this is just bogglingggg. And yes I am aware that the officer probably had ulterior motives.

  3. Did this cop receive a traumatic brain injury before pulling this guy over? This guy just keep repeating the same question over and over. Holy crap.

  4. I liked this guy he was very polite and respectful 😊. He didnt have to roll it down as far as it was. Cops dont like being told no. Ego gets then in trouble every time

  5. Yeah right cop gave him a warning even though he claimed he had a radar reading?? Bet the warning did not show any radar reading. He was fishing to get him to admit to speeding. Yes cops lie

  6. Cop gets an F! Mr Transparency gets an A+. Cop is a bad officer. He lied about the speed, he lied about what the law was, he repeatedly tried to trick or intimidate Mr Transparency into giving information he was not required to give, and he sees himself a Cop, and everyone else as a "violator".

  7. Why do these encounters always happen in the South ? Even against white people. Are you supposed to tell the cop," Hell yes, I was driving like a bat out of hell down the road".

  8. It’s always a catch 22. If officers ask for information are denied such information they immediately deem the civilian to be hiding something, however, if he said he was only doing 5 over the speed limit that show’s technically he was breaking the law. So this isn’t typical of how it goes down and I’m glad the officer didn’t escalate the situation and try to get dogs out or say he smelled alcohol or something just to try and get the driver on something. In all honesty though, I’m always honest with the police and I am very polite so I have mostly been given warnings outside of a single incident where an officer was obviously having a bad day. I tried to pass someone doing 38 in a 45 but had to go very fast because he sped up and a car then was seen coming in the opposite direction so I had to speed up to get over. I made it and the oncoming car might have had to break a bit but that driver followed me and I went down side streets to make sure. Then I pulled into a driveway to turn around and he blocked me in a driveway and because I was 17 the officer gave me a ticket and I showed up in court to fight it but the guy actually walked up and chatted with the judge like they knew each other and the lawyer I was provided told me to take a BS deal because it was good and only required me to take a traffic class. I still don’t think I was wrong but I didn’t know what to do.

  9. If officers can lie then so can the citizen. Of course we know this is not the case for me this dismisses all law enforcement departments from duty. Please don't forget to clear out your lockers

  10. I like how they always say "I don't want to talk through this little gap in the window" like they need to press their face into the gap lol

  11. Suspect: "I don't think you're gonna hurt me but idk you so I have my defense up. Do you think I'm gonna hurt you?"
    Officer: "No"
    Suspect: "But you have your defense up?"

    sick line

  12. This is why I don’t engage. Take your power back. They want to get you talking. Only respond when legally required. This cop is insufferable.

  13. While it is nitpicky to continue harping on the window, I wonder if some of these initial questions like this are a type of "temperature test" to see how cooperative someone is going to be. In this case, the officer is being excessive… but on situations where the individual being questioned is hostile/entitled/bratty/etc. I can see where this technique could be helpful.

  14. This ratings are so random. Mr. Transparency was a not an A. Whatever if its his his right or not to not roll down the window and whatever the insisting of it from the cop was random. It didnt have any practical use for Mr Transparent and could have unnecessarily heaten up the situation. At best they both are around a B.

  15. Not a bad officer, well his upper management is bad. It’s called (making the quota ). Every city has a budget. Budget spending gets out of hand and the only way you can manage your budget , is to write more tickets. When a police officer tells you they don’t have a quota system, there flat out lying. Every sergeant or high ranking officer will come down on there officers if they don’t meet there daily amount of tickets. This alone, forces officers to stretch the truth and once they cross that line, it creates a shady mindset that worsen over time. So, how do we fix this. Easy, take away qualified immunity and install mandatory constitutional schooling. Each officer raises there hand and state they agreed to the oath of office within the laws of the constitution, yet practically 99 percent have never even read the constitution.

  16. thumbs down for clickbaity title… decent interaction covered but sly wording to attract viewers, not going to subscribe based off this, irrespective of content.

  17. I mean he could have just rolled his window down and been on his way. There are times when cops are out of line. And some dude wanting to test his rights and piss a cop off

Comments are closed.