Family Court Judge Search Case – Part 3: today was the Disciplinary Hearing! – Everything Law and Order Blog

Update on the Family Court Judge caught on video searching my client’s house. Today they had the disciplinary hearing on the formal charges against her. Here’s what happened.

Here’s Part 2, in case you missed it: https://youtu.be/V-2o0PVLQtk

And Part 1: https://youtu.be/_0IDL8ll2x4

Read more: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/the-family-court-judge-search-case/

source

26 thoughts on “Family Court Judge Search Case – Part 3: today was the Disciplinary Hearing!”
  1. If she had no authority to enter the house and take objects, but still did so with the threat of force, shouldn't that put her in the same category as other armed robbers? I'm assuming that everyone is subject to the same laws, regardless of title and profession, and that she would've been in serious trouble, if she had pulled that stunt with a local bank. A private citizen should have the same protection as any corporate entity, if not more. Right?

    I'm probably just being naive, here…

  2. Obviously, you can't get a higher fine than the max, even if the max is incredibly ineffective as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crimes. I thought fines were supposed to not just be punitive, but act as a deterrent to others. How on earth she and her lawyers were able to get her out of not only a disbarment, which she so richly deserves, but out of a suspension as well is beyond me. The track record of this "judge" doing this is beyond the pale. I get that she's now going to be sued into oblivion, having already admitted guilt, but this makes it clear that justice isn't on the table from either the state or the other attorneys. This is about trying to get as much money as possible with the least amount of effort. It's about a profit margin. Both your client and yourself could have gotten a lot of money by doing this correctly and seeking actual justice, but no, an attorney is still an attorney no matter which side they're on. In the end, they will always make a business decision and take the most amount of money they can get with the least amount of resistance. Pretty disgraceful, but it is cops, attorneys, and judges so there really are no good guys in this scenario.

  3. Does anyone know if this lawyer has any vids in his library about Statutory Jurisdiction?
    I've looked but didn't see anything. I'm no expert in this, but I've used challenging jurisdiction in traffic/criminal court twice, and it worked. 5 'criminal' charges, including resisting.

  4. Only 5 grand? There should be a much stiffer financial penalty considering what happened. Go for everything and make an example of this judge. There was a line in the sand and the fact she stepped over it so nonchalantly makes me believe she's not the only one and it is likely a deeper problem than her.

Leave a Reply