Family Court Judge Search Case – Part 3: today was the Disciplinary Hearing!

1. BTW, 5K was the maximum allowed by law. Also, relax….. if you’ve followed my other cases, you know what’s coming next. 😉

2. Judges are criminals too.

3. After winning this step have her charged with criminal trespass

4. ❤️💯 Keep following this threw, we have to know what happens for such a serious neglect of her duties. This should be a very serious consequences!

5. Wow

6. What about the bailiff or other court officers involved in this action?

7. POWER…. fact that the officers did not get the agency lawyer involved is just…..how many time has this judge done this.

8. If she had no authority to enter the house and take objects, but still did so with the threat of force, shouldn't that put her in the same category as other armed robbers? I'm assuming that everyone is subject to the same laws, regardless of title and profession, and that she would've been in serious trouble, if she had pulled that stunt with a local bank. A private citizen should have the same protection as any corporate entity, if not more. Right?

   I'm probably just being naive, here…

9. Slaps on the wrist like this is exactly why the law abusing officials do abuse their positions there's no punishment and this is a perfect example.

10. Only five grand were's the justice .Should be removed as well .

11. Are you civilly suing her?

12. I remember this case , the judge acted like a dictator in this case .

13. It is a joke and the joke is on those who the judge blatanly denie due process and fairness under the law. $5000.00 fine is travesty.

14. Geez officials in WV think they are GOD

15. She essentially got a light tap on the wrist…that's not justice….

16. Violating people's rights for 20 years and that's the ultimate punishment?

    If I've said it once, I've said it a million times… Attorneys are the biggest threat to National Security.

17. Obviously, you can't get a higher fine than the max, even if the max is incredibly ineffective as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crimes. I thought fines were supposed to not just be punitive, but act as a deterrent to others. How on earth she and her lawyers were able to get her out of not only a disbarment, which she so richly deserves, but out of a suspension as well is beyond me. The track record of this "judge" doing this is beyond the pale. I get that she's now going to be sued into oblivion, having already admitted guilt, but this makes it clear that justice isn't on the table from either the state or the other attorneys. This is about trying to get as much money as possible with the least amount of effort. It's about a profit margin. Both your client and yourself could have gotten a lot of money by doing this correctly and seeking actual justice, but no, an attorney is still an attorney no matter which side they're on. In the end, they will always make a business decision and take the most amount of money they can get with the least amount of resistance. Pretty disgraceful, but it is cops, attorneys, and judges so there really are no good guys in this scenario.

18. Thats a petty win. She needs to be fired

19. Does anyone know if this lawyer has any vids in his library about Statutory Jurisdiction?
    I've looked but didn't see anything. I'm no expert in this, but I've used challenging jurisdiction in traffic/criminal court twice, and it worked. 5 'criminal' charges, including resisting.

20. When they file the civil case, I wonder if they'll use
    USC CH. 13, Title 18, Art. 241. Looks like it's spelled out in there.

21. 20 years of this Karen being on the bench. WTH !!! Can not trust that no one brought up her before this.

22. A slap on the wrist for what would be multiple felony charges and 20+ years for anyone not in political office.

23. Thanks Mr. Bryan, Appreciate the timely update.

24. Is that a Springfield

25. Only 5 grand? There should be a much stiffer financial penalty considering what happened. Go for everything and make an example of this judge. There was a line in the sand and the fact she stepped over it so nonchalantly makes me believe she's not the only one and it is likely a deeper problem than her.

26. Go for her qualified immunity and sue her for violating your client’s civil rights. The fine and censure are an insult to your client and all others she did these things to.

Comments are closed.