Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUMZYFZNII
1 love Ent’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@1loveent125
Sources:
Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ
Utah v. Strieff- https://bit.ly/3prr7cY
United States v. Rusher- https://bit.ly/3CNilsV
United States v. Place- https://bit.ly/3dYJ7Sd
Indianapolis v. Edmond- https://bit.ly/3rpswOz
Illinois v. Caballes- https://bit.ly/3aYrksV
Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc
Partlow v. State- https://bit.ly/3Pt5L9J
Steck v. State- https://bit.ly/43WDAEP
They prolonged the stop for the dog search. Then miraculously after the dog fails to alert, the cop with the dog comes back and says you know just to make sure that my dog's doing his job, can you confirm whether there is or isn't narcotics in the car! 🤣🤣🤣
So… Where is the "calibration" on the canine? Speed trap needs a radar gun tested. We need to stop this bs
A traffic violation on private property is unconstitutional. Das y they didn’t use force. They know a judge somewhere along da way wuld have just deemed da traffic law unconstitutional which means da force used wuld have been unconstitutional. Just like da stop signs in a Walmart parking lot. Da only thing u can do is trespass me from da Walmart for not obeying da signs.
Motivation might not count, but probable cause does. Cops have to prove the traffic violation, because we are all innocent until proven guilty. A dog sniff might not be unconstitutional but waiting for one is.
Your title gets a D, they didn't give up still gave him a warning.
So funny how cops go, “if you did nothing wrong youll let us search the vehicle” they really mean, “if you did nothing wrong let us violate your rights”
The only thing the police and the guy agreed on is, they love fishing. 🐟 🎣 🚔 🚓 👮♂️
We need to work to over turn the dog sniff nonsense. The fact is that most of the time these are just pets that have been trained to "alert." There is no comprehensive testing or training for these dogs. The number of false positives is concerning.
I don't understand how they can demand someone step out for a dog sniff. Why does someone have to do a certain thing for them to do their sniff?
These grades are crazy. How do you give them a “C” for clear, racial profiling, violation of rights, and unprofessionalism?
This dude is cool as hell
Good ol Cumberland maryland
Not interested in that kind of language…😮😢
Got money in your wallet?
Dog would probably hit on your wallet.
Driving while black is a minefield! I’m glad we have cameras so they can try to keep the cops honest. Can you imagine how this stop would have gone down 50 years ago?!😮
dog sniff 50%
the dogs lie just like cops but you cannot question a dog in court
Double the penalty for cops who knowingly or unknowingly break the law. In Court IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE! They are PAID and TRAINED to uphold the laws they violate!
Those Dogs can "alert" anytime a cop wants it to lol… so that is a joke…
Maryland cops should know not to fuck around after Baltimores whole department was found to be majorly corrupt after stealing from drug dealers and taking bribes
Not all cops act like dickheads HOWEVER, all dickheads act like cops.
Probably wanted to plant drugs in the vehicle.
I firmly believe if a dog which is truly properly trained to sniff out contraband. It should be able to compete the task with no coaxing from the handler. Meaning free, no leash, no following by handler. No verbal commands, no hand commands. Etc……
you mean officer douche
Police should be REQUIRED to keep records of how often there dogs supposedly alert vs how often there are no drugs, pointing to false alerts by the dog or cop.
I DON'T agree that sniffer dogs ARE less intrusive because:
a) Police almost ALWAYS illegally detain the person MUCH longer than necessary, and LEGAL, to force them to wait for the drug sniffing dogs (people should fight on THAT basis), and
b) Police can (and I think, do) LIE about dogs alerting, so they can illegally bypass the Constitution. The subject needs to be allowed to record the dog signals, and dog signals SHOULD have to be CLEAR and the same across the board, such as sitting, or preferably barking, as EVERYONE can hear that.