Harassed For Going UNDER The Speed Limit – Everything Law and Order Blog

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNhpph03X4Mx

rickey pouncil’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@rickeypouncil

Sources:

Minn. Stat. § 169.15- http://bit.ly/3ZrF9qU

Minn. Stat. § 169.18- http://bit.ly/3ZlhTLq

State v. Ellanson- http://bit.ly/3FZHFOt

Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ

State v. Wiegand- http://bit.ly/3ntCxMe

Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc

Stanwood v. Stolts- http://bit.ly/3KfisRB

U.S. v. Fickas- http://bit.ly/3GoVjLp

U.S. v. Beck- http://bit.ly/3ZpkJPt

U.S. v. Brown- http://bit.ly/3LWws53

Knudsen v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety- http://bit.ly/3ntY8E7

Bumper v. North Carolina- http://bit.ly/3nxuvSB

U.S. v. Lattimore- http://bit.ly/3M0RiQE

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

24 thoughts on “Harassed For Going UNDER The Speed Limit”
  1. The reason why these dirty cop'per's, ask people do they have drug's in their car,is because, the majority of these dirty cop'per's are, drug addict's!!! The Truth..

  2. Stop cooperating with cops and cooperate with your constitutional rights that the gov officials and officers have sworn before God to uphold.

  3. Boy as soon as the driver “allowed” Lowry to search the car you could hear the giddiness of a kid in a candy store in cop’s voice. Trash in uniform.

  4. You know I've seen literally thousands of videos on YouTube alone that make me more fearful of law enforcement than of any type of criminal or terrorist or vagrant or anything like that. I can count on one hand the number of incidents I've seen that were positive would law enforcement in my entire life video or in reality….
    And when I say positive, all I really mean is just it was quick courteous and nothing bad happened

  5. He illegally searched him, as there was no reasonable suspicion that was armed and dangerous.

    No reasonable suspicion to extend the stop.

    His suspicion was that he was black and the cop didn't like his answers. How DARE he have a right to remain silent or choose what questions to answer.

    NEVER say yes to search ANYTHING. EVER!!!!

    It definitely wasn't a voluntary search anyways, because he told him he was going to have to wait there, illegally, for sniffer dogs, long past the end of the traffic stop. But NEVER consent.

Comments are closed.