Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNhpph03X4Mx
rickey pouncil’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@rickeypouncil
Sources:
Minn. Stat. § 169.15- http://bit.ly/3ZrF9qU
Minn. Stat. § 169.18- http://bit.ly/3ZlhTLq
State v. Ellanson- http://bit.ly/3FZHFOt
Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ
State v. Wiegand- http://bit.ly/3ntCxMe
Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc
Stanwood v. Stolts- http://bit.ly/3KfisRB
U.S. v. Fickas- http://bit.ly/3GoVjLp
U.S. v. Beck- http://bit.ly/3ZpkJPt
U.S. v. Brown- http://bit.ly/3LWws53
Knudsen v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety- http://bit.ly/3ntY8E7
Bumper v. North Carolina- http://bit.ly/3nxuvSB
U.S. v. Lattimore- http://bit.ly/3M0RiQE
Just goggle his name please, lmk what u find
ATA makes me soo happy I'm not American. You guys kinda have a shit hole country otg down there
The reason why these dirty cop'per's, ask people do they have drug's in their car,is because, the majority of these dirty cop'per's are, drug addict's!!! The Truth..
Another scumbag officer….surprise!!!
I think it’s pretty clear what the officer found suspicious…
Stop cooperating with cops and cooperate with your constitutional rights that the gov officials and officers have sworn before God to uphold.
That officer Douchebag McButthurt is a waste of DNA.
Not all black dudes are criminals.
That stupid racist cop got his feelings hurt.wah.
Racist cop. Stupid cop.
Wow.just wow.
Overeager to id and arrest…policing in America today.
Boy as soon as the driver “allowed” Lowry to search the car you could hear the giddiness of a kid in a candy store in cop’s voice. Trash in uniform.
It doesn't even sound like he was weaving. It sounds like he was just in the middle lane.
Blatant racial profiling
Yuck
That poor cop putting up with that harassment
A+ citizen in my book.
You know I've seen literally thousands of videos on YouTube alone that make me more fearful of law enforcement than of any type of criminal or terrorist or vagrant or anything like that. I can count on one hand the number of incidents I've seen that were positive would law enforcement in my entire life video or in reality….
And when I say positive, all I really mean is just it was quick courteous and nothing bad happened
So no tickets, no probable cause, no suspicious circumstances, and a lengthy detention for no reason.
cop are general ignorant of the specific laws sad
In the history of the Universe, has anyone EVER answered the question, "is there anything illegal in the car?" in the affirmative?
He illegally searched him, as there was no reasonable suspicion that was armed and dangerous.
No reasonable suspicion to extend the stop.
His suspicion was that he was black and the cop didn't like his answers. How DARE he have a right to remain silent or choose what questions to answer.
NEVER say yes to search ANYTHING. EVER!!!!
It definitely wasn't a voluntary search anyways, because he told him he was going to have to wait there, illegally, for sniffer dogs, long past the end of the traffic stop. But NEVER consent.
This channel rating are moving me away from support.. this was clearly profiling and. Over -policing.