Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWYKiO3wMyE
Trespassing arrest video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjjJFObUlf0&t=784s
4corner Fistntheair’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@4cornerFistntheair54
Press For Transparency’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@pressfortransparency
Previous AtA episode with Mr. Chee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CElOqolz-4&t=340s
Arrest records (Justin Chee): https://bit.ly/3VHKRa6
Arrest records (Adam Howell): https://bit.ly/4ai4FFl
Sources:
Irizarry v. Yehia- https://bit.ly/3vSNSGS
ACLU of Illinois v. Alvarez- https://bit.ly/3MANUvB
Gericke v. Begin- https://bit.ly/2SiII5U
Branzburg v. Hayes- https://bit.ly/3lYzh6R
Farmington Code of Ord. § 18-7-2- https://bit.ly/3TVh6RP
N.M. Stat. § 30-22-1- https://bit.ly/44syv6z
United States v. Romero- https://bit.ly/3bkCjAW
State v. Diaz- https://bit.ly/3xqnAPK
City of Roswell v. Smith- https://bit.ly/4aDZCiC
If you could take the time to watch this video to the end I would sincerely appreciate it. It's the best way to help keep this channel going! Thank you and have a great day!
These cops were pretty damned cool. I want to live there!
The office asking politely, repeatedly while keeping calm and talking softly to the person in the truck should have tipped them off that something fairly serious was happening and they should comply. They could still get footage.
Even the second set of officers that arrived were calm and professional and didn’t mind them filming as long as they stepped back.
Repeating shhh shhhh shhh to the female officer while she was not escalating the situation was an asshole move.
F for perpetrating arrests and seeking charges for clear retaliation against Civil Rights. Turns out they were right about every officer. 66 days for being in a public park? Public parks shouldn't be private for any amount of time
The problem of "reasonable" being included in courts' language, is that courts are very frequently unreasonable, particularly regarding police, and especially Civil Rights. And police are almost never reasonable at all
13:20 what is the Long Island Audit doing here? What is this, a crossover episode? 😅
Im usually always on the auditors side, but not this one, we clearly see and hear the dude in the truck isn't rite. The should have backed way up and gave them the space they asked for. Cool to about it.
These two "auditors" should teach a class on how to be a BAD auditor that gives other auditors a bad name. Or, retitled, "Things to NOT do as an auditor." They would make a killing.
There’s was no reason to tha😢 wa😢 we. The narrator is wrong and needs to actually need to be in the out there in the acacual in the situation
This was a retaliatory arrest because he filmed the police and they didn’t like it
What reason do you have to say the filming was antagonizing a potentially armed individual, other than an officer making the claim. The officer states the person is antagonized. But even if that’s true, which may or may not be true, that precedent requires officers to also believe the “perp” is armed. And almost always when cops think a “perp” is armed, they temporarily confiscate the weapon or frequently restrain the “perp” for officer safety. Granted I’m only halfway through the video but if the driver is both intoxicated and carrying a weapon it’s extremely unlikely an officer would allow that individual to remain unrestrained and/or armed. It feels like AtA is losing a lot of attention to detail recently
It’s time to stop paying for this crap.
If cops are blocking your caamera, Politely inform the officer you're recording and believe they're obstructing your right. If they claim to protect another officer, use a tripod and step away. Continued obstruction? You have evidence for a complaint. Multiple complaints may lead to policy change favouring constitutional rights.
Right or wrong it’s a judge stepping outside the scope of his duties . Also police officers did nothing wrong here but officers and judges need to realize the public does need to have the ability to see and hear clearly when documenting a questionable police encounter where a member of the public may be having their rights violated that’s what the whole right to film should entail. Remember the police never had a problem in the 90s when the show cops made them out to be hero’s everyday for decades never said a word now all the sudden they don’t want anyone even close enough to hear anything . And as far as the public safety goes police officers are not responsible for the safety of the public , we are repaonsible for our own safety at all times . Police don’t get charged for not being able to keep anyone safe not in custody .
That is a judge basically acting as an investigator by basically reviewing encounters after the fact . If the police were going to take action against him they should have done it then
Fraudutors are the absolute worst.
So dude had a TBI and they let him just drive off? Maher cops m a ke sense
I find it annoying that Mr Chi would cherry pick cases that fit his agenda. Even going so far as to cut out parts of the case that he knows will NOT fit with his own narrative!
Cops have a right to have them leave the area, as he was escalating the situation by aggravating the man in the truck. Concern for escalating a situation gives the police the right to make the “auditors” leave the area
Auditors are being antagonistic. Wayyyy to much encroachment on situation that could have gone a dangerous way.
The auditor that is closest to the truck is the worse kind
This is when the auditors are pushing to far and should be arrested. That's way to close to the police doing their job. Could of went bad bc of their actions and the want to be relevant. They give good auditors who's actually doing it for a good reason a bad name. Just 2 dumbasses making things worse and getting in the way. The officers did a great job and wish more was trained like them. While I don't agree that charges shouldn't of been pressed bc he's broken the law before and he could of made the situation worse and you're fast to point out law enforcement should face charges if they abuse their power.
Am sorry but those camera people were annoying. They put cameras near someone going through something and was not mentally well who got clearly aggratated by them. They put the officers in a situation. Auditors were distracting officers from stopping any potential issues. Point is they are within their rights to record. But this was a dangerous situation that didn't need them acting like children for being asked to move back from a dangerous situation if he had a weapon not a traffic stop.
But why was the drunk guy permitted to DRIVE away. AND if he was carrying a firearm while intoxicated, that should have been another charge!
Saying that criminal charges might not have been necessary is tantamount to saying the two guys antagonizing the situation was necessary
Given that police are absolutely and limitlessly allowed to lie to civilians, and frequently do lie concerning filming that they don't happen to like, it seems unreasonable to assume that they are always being truthful when telling said civilian that something is a legal command. How is one to know
that a cop is lying or telling the truth? That is a huge problem with allowing them to knowingly and willfully being able to lie at all. Clearly a "cry wolf" type of situation. Who's to know the difference? It's arguably significant that Mr. Chi was on probation. He has no greater ability to tell truth from allowable lie than anyone else. 🤔
She was kinda bad tho🍒🍒
I'm not sure I'm good with the warrant. They weren't saying anything until the officers addressed them, which set off the gentlemen, and he more than likely wouldn't have been if they ignored them. If the second officer had walked up and just said, "We are dealing with a gentleman with a PTSD issue, and if you could just step back a little further than normal, it would really help settle the situation down." I would have understood the warrant if they hadn't backed it up after that. They were under the impression it was a regular contact if I don't think it's asking the officers to explain why they need more distance when required. (Please don't tell me they don't have to do that or didn't have time, he had time to test his 1st amendment knowledge with them, so he could have just quickly explained why)
Why did Chi get get a harsher sentence when he was farther back than the other auditor and the suspect in the truck was more mad at the other guy going "shhhhh" to the officer? The lady officer was even talking to the guy going shhh and really didn't tell Chi to step back
Cry baby cops. Don’t get what they want, so they they move to hurt someone. Give them an A, you’re wrong.
These auditors are just being dumb. These type of auditors look for trouble.
I’m not sad about this. The cops were very respectful. But those auditors should be ashamed of themselves. They could have made the situation so much worse.
He was on a "data base"
Wow …. let that sink in for a minute .
So they already know your persona non grata before they even talk to you .
Talk about profiling .
I get auditing but if the guy doesn't want his traffic stop filmed let the man be
If police officers commit crimes or do bad things, they get a year in prison, but one important thing is that God is watching those who do bad things and they are not angels, they make bad people among us, but they go to a place of hell
Big surprise someone that uses the communist fist in their name and also likes to quiz people on our constitution ended up being a complete fraud and dousche. I am SHOCKED.
I'm glad that this channel always aims to a comprehensive and objective perspective and calls out the bad and wrong from everyone involved without talking sidees.
I don't understand if the driver has mental or drink problems why in the hell is he allowed to drive
5:12 I had a friend with last name "Begin". It was pronounced Bay-jee.
Those two crappy auditors make the good ones look bad
Bout time you actually judged on right.
Serves the prick right for not giving the officers the space they kindly asked for several times
Good. Those guys were intentionally stirring the pot. I was afraid the guy in the pickup was going to get out and threaten those guys with his knife which is why I feel the auditors were interfering with an investigation. I feel the arrests were warranted.
Cops walking away.
Auditor: :"You guys are dismissed"
What a tiny penis move.
I don’t get this you can record the cops. This is saying you can’t.
These cops retaliated against the auditors.
Even tho these guys are tools. One could argue that its not THEIR obligation to stop doing a lawfully protected activity just because some jackweed is annoyed at them. Police don't decide what gets recorded in public, and that man in the truck needs to respect people's rights just like everyone else has to. Honestly… why did he get away with threatening to ram people with his truck and get let go?
These cops were awesome dealing with the subject and the cameramen! The male officer did a good job of pulling the cameramen back and distracting them without using force or coercion. The only thing they might have done better is quietly mentioning that the subject was mentally agitated, but I’m not sure these d-bags would have taken the hint.