UPDATE: Since the writing of this episode the trial was moved to a neighboring county and postponed until October 3, 2022.

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-jlvUrIcgQ&t=4s

Direct Action Everywhere’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/DirectActionEverywhere

Sources:

Utah Code § 76-9-102- https://bit.ly/3zFLZOS

Irizarry v. Yehia- https://bit.ly/3vSNSGS

Connick v. Myers- https://bit.ly/3A9gwpB

Waters v. Churchill- https://bit.ly/3JGLvg7

Worrell v. Henry- https://bit.ly/3PewsLM

Brown v. Louisiana- https://bit.ly/3BUNxY8

Terminiello v. Chicago- https://bit.ly/3rORi90

Snyder v. Phelps- https://bit.ly/3JGAjQC

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

27 thoughts on “HUGE LAWSUIT! These Cops Had NO IDEA What They Were Doing!”
  1. More stupid cops. "Saying they can do anything they want they say because theories cops and say they don't give a damn about our Constitutional Rights" they swore to uphold.

  2. It is not a "lawful order" to tell someone not to film a stranger on the street.

    A "lawful order" is an order that is backed up by an actual law. "Give me your ID" after being stopped for speeding is a "lawful order." Cops think that anything they order someone to do is a "lawful order."

  3. The activist is a complete idiot for the cause he supports, but he's WELL within his constitutional rights. The cops may have a role in preserving the peace and might not like him (I know I don't), but that doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to say what he's saying.

  4. Never thought I'd die fighting side by side with a vegan.

    What about side by side with a fellow free speech advocate?

    Aye, I could do that.

  5. I agree: He has the right to set up on public property. I will fight for his right. But also ignore him when I get about my day!

  6. I'm a Utah resident and love Pioneer Day festivities. I likely would not agree with the general politics of this activist group (although I may or may not agree with the particular criticisms of Smithfield Foids). I agree totally that these deputies brought their personal feelings about the politics into their policing which is generally not a good idea. In this case it led to a 1st Amendment violation. Whether they agree with the politics of the activists or it's implications for employment prospects in that town, that is ENTIRELY irrelevant to the right of the activists to engage individuals on the street in peaceful conversation about it.

  7. Any police officer, or public servant, who gets upset about being filmed by a camera needs to filmed by two cameras. That's more of a red flag that you should keep filming.

Comments are closed.