Informed Sergeant Swiftly Corrects Officer

1. Download NewsVoice for FREE here: https://newsvoice.com/app/audittheaudit

   Also be sure to check out the AtA Radio Show right here on YouTube every Sunday at 1pm CST!

2. His opinion is like an asshole every one has one 😂😂😂

3. That short cop looks bored 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

4. Why should it take a supervisor for shit like this 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

5. Sucks I’m here now but the app is no longer available

6. 5:15 The most confusing part of this whole incident is this cops haircut dudes gotta be in his 50s but has a 9 year olds haircut

7. There was no correction whatsoever! And that's the issue.

8. 3 years later and NewsVoice no longer exists. Website doesn't work. Google results are empty.

9. At long last a GOOD COP…. Few & far between they are.

10. 29 years on the job and the cop is still just an officer? Shows his intelligence really well, doesn’t it?

11. 😮Eff the Constitution. Here's your badge.

12. That's one ignorant pig

13. Nice topee.

14. I think I know that Sergeant, I worked in Saint Louis Park for a bit and had to work with the Police due to the nature of what I did. Funny how that works

15. He said " we " as if the cop was participating in the activity they were doing. 🙄

16. The stop & identify statutes I've read, still requires that police need reasonable, articulable suspicion that a crime is being committed, which would fit with the Constitution. But people should read the statue if they have a stop and identify statue in their state.

    I would say a LAWFUL order is an order that does not violate the law. I honestly think it's pretty clear.

17. 9:44 – Over 29 years as a police officer, but NEVER knew the Constitution that is . . . HOW OLD???? It's NOT "modern policing." It's just on tape now. I would hope they were always supposed to follow the law.

18. 3:36 – You are CONTRADICTING yourself. First you're saying they don't have to have reasonable, articulable suspicion of committing a crime. And then you say just the opposite that the Supreme Court has listed a 2-part reason to decide if they should stop someone, but part of that 2 part reason is having "reasonable, articulable suspicion that there is a crime of foot." If they can't specify a crime is afoot on tape, or what suspicions they have that a crime is afoot then they have no reason to stop them. I would absolutely ask that question because if you have a court appearance, after that, you can show that they had no reason to suspect you and therefore no reason to ask you to provide identification. You may have to follow their orders if it is a lawful order.

    A "lawful order" CLEARLY means the order can NOT violate the law or Constitution.

19. U rlly talk 2 much

20. “Just bend the knee” every person with a badge

21. The Nazi is strong in these cops

22. You contradicted yourself. You said "Law enforcement does not have to believe a specific crime has, is, or is about to take place to aquire reasonable suspicion." Then when you talked about Terry v Ohio, you said, "requires… specific articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant an intrusion…. When law enforcement has reasonable articulable suspicion crime is afoot taken from the circumstances and their experiences, if the officer believes the crime being committed is a violent one, or believes that the suspect is armed and dangerous, he may perform a frisk." If they believe the crime is a violent one, that is specific, and if they need specificity that a crime is taking place(past, present, or future) that needs specificity to be valid.

23. that shit was over so quick i had to rewind to make sure i caught everything

24. That cop looks as dumb as he is

25. That dude should arrest his barber

26. Sgt. Looks like a guy that you would want to be stopped by. No srsly that guy is Alfa as fucc. Absolute GIGA CHAD. A pleasure to see that guy be in a police force. That auditor is also a giga chad. He achieved a goal of calmly educating the officer without making him a fool and followed up and ensured the force is good and healthy. I also see how wholesome this ending was. I am planning to do a tour of USA’s natural parks and I hope that if I run into a police this kind of behavior would be present. I hate seeing tyranical cops… that discourages us foreigners to visit and spend our money in USA cause we are simply afraid of police interactions. Thanks for this great video educating me and all those going for the same way of healthy relationships between people.

Comments are closed.