Judge losing patience in Young Thug trial; Mayor claims lavish ‘perks’ weren’t bribes – TCN Sidebar

1. Thug innocent

2. Prosecutor with malice and forethought sabotaging trial.

3. The case against Adams is weak –
   Political retribution

4. She’s most likely never going to grant a mistrial. Judges tend to not do it when they feel like the defense is winning the case because the judges won’t have any repercussions for the decision especially when Whitaker knows the state won’t be able to bring this to trial again. Judges lose elections all the time over mistrials. Not guilty. Case close. No appeal. Over. And btw that’s exactly what the defense wants as well. They always say they don’t want this case to be a mistrial but they have to file the motion to preserve the issue for appeal in case they lose.

5. Incompetent prosecutor! Practicing hood justice.

6. Hiding evidence further shows u even prosecutors committs crime. People who committ crime and live in sin judges other ls for committing sin. Who is righteous enough to judge other sins. Only God can be trusted in truth. All men and women are flawed.

7. Pt.2 Example

   Ben and John decide to break into a 82 year old ladies house and rob her of her jewelry and money. They plan everything out buy an illegal firearm and they are ready to commit burglary and home evasion. But the real e they need a driver to carry out this crime so Ben ask his girlfriend Sara and she agrees. The next night Sara drops Ben and John off at the house as she patiently awaits for them. They break in find the 72 year old rob her then leave. However John runs back inside and shoots the 72 year old lady in the head and leaves, the 72 year old passes away. The next day license plates reader catches them so detectives bring in Sara. Sara tells who she was with Ben and John so detectives snatched them up also. Sara confesses to her involvement but Ben and John doesn’t, they maintain their innocence. Sara takes a plea deal of aiding and abetting murder and home evasion and gets life without the possibility. However the DA is going for the death penalty on Ben and John since they refuse to take a plea deal. During the trial the prosecutors were able to secure a guilty conviction with Sara’s testimony and other key evidence. Ben and John were found guilty of 1st Degree Murder and Home evasion. They were sentenced to death by electrocution. However 1 year into there sentence it was discovered that Prosecutors had withheld evidence from the defense for Ben and John’s trial that could have or may have changed the course of the trial as a witness stated they actually heard another man confess to actually being the one that shot the 72 year old and broke into her house not the 3 that were arrested. Therefore presented with the new Brady evidence the Judge dismissed the case with prejudice against Ben and John and they were released from death row never to be able to be retried again. However since Sara took a plea deal and admitted to what was alleged in the indictment she does not have the same recourse. Ben and John maintained there innocence they did not do this and the evidence could have helped them prove they didn’t do this however but Sara didn’t dispute the evidence and actually agreed yes I did those things therefore there is no alleged crimes she may have not committed since she admitted during her sentencing and guilty plea what she had did of which only the driver of the crime would have known since the state never released certain information to the public and only the driver of the crime would have known that information and she admitted and plea to it. Therefore Sara will spin the rest of her life in prison while the actual murders walked 🆓. This actually happened and is based on a true story.

8. No these guys obviously don’t understand how this works. She took a plea deal am I not correct? When u take a plea u wave rights that a person says not guilty of the evidence presented or charged against me, I didn’t do it. Therefore u have the right of all the balances of due process. However if u take a plea u essentially admit the charge that your indeed guilty of therefore u cant claim now your also not guilty based on the same equitable evidence for your co-defendant. No you’re not. I went to law school two years before I switched to medical engineering school. Let me give you an example I think people understand better when presented with an example. See pt.2

9. Also the defense attorney needs to stop requesting a mistrial because double jeopardy is attached. If they loose the case will be won on appeal so why ask for a mistrial and double jeopardy isn’t attached.

10. This is a man’s life and they are still playing with his life as if it was some sort of dog 🐕 on the street. If I were judge or governor I would immediately end this case as it is a circus show and makes the state of Georgia look like high school law students trying there very first murder case. The state bit off more than they could chew.

11. This is a man’s life and they are still playing with his life as if it was some sort of dog 🐕 on the street. If I were judge or governor I would immediately end this case as it is a circus show and makes the state of Georgia look like high school law students trying there very first murder case. The state bit off more than they could chew.

12. Throw the bum in prison. He'll end up there one way or another. They always do.

13. Great summation as always Joshua, US law is strange to me. UK.

14. Yall need to go look into the nuances of Hannahs case, and the argument, and the lawyers performance, and the timing and the actions taken — also…. the defense attorney was offered these bullets first before he went to the police.

15. I don’t know if you read these comments alot but could you comment on my theory? When it comes to the Hannah Gutierrez-Reed appeal denial could it be because when Troy Teske dropped them off at the SFSD it was after or towards the end of her trial? Making it not “exculpatory/brady” evidence.? Love the show and curious to hear your thoughts.

16. why is he slurring?

17. Oof your guests agenda was layed out and now i cant believe a word he says. This was about i guess some rapper, and then out of the blue for no reason compares the judge to trumps judge on his crimes as if they are bad people lol.

18. I love Neema!! Nice to hear what he has to say without a CourtTV host cutting him off!! He needs to be on here more!!

19. It’s a movie set Baldwin is allowed to point the gun at the camera and fire after it’s been through the safety checks by the correct people. It was handed to him and told it was safe. James Bond points and fires a gun at the camera every movie and no one ever stops him from doing it because in the movies guns are sometimes pointed at others and fired but in a safe controlled way.

20. Of course, in the USA there are problems with the tax system, but look how people survive in the CIS countries, Crime, mafia, corruption and poverty. We have a lot of videos like this on our channel with English subtitles, the essence will be 100% clear to you

Comments are closed.