Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMdNtn6Zagk

All Trendy News’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@alltrendynews1838

Sources:

Article- https://bit.ly/42haTk7

Tex. Pen. Code §22.01- https://bit.ly/3ORfEhh

Tex. Pen. Code §1.07- https://bit.ly/45FtysQ

Gomez v. State- https://bit.ly/43zsl4q

Foster v. State- https://bit.ly/3qqkI1L

Hiibel v. Nevada- https://bit.ly/3nYdxIV

Tex. Pen. Code §38.02 – https://bit.ly/43dl22y

Navarette v. California- https://bit.ly/2Nzuo6W

Brother v. State- https://bit.ly/3qgxVKx

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 14.03- https://bit.ly/3oGUPKS

Woods v. State- https://bit.ly/3ORfHtt

Johnson v. State- https://bit.ly/3P8gvuj

Dyar v. State- https://bit.ly/43fMwor

Goldberg v. State- https://bit.ly/43gfYdR

Virginia v. Moore- https://bit.ly/3bIlhJT

U.S. v. Lopez- https://bit.ly/3qkYrm7

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

50 thoughts on “Karen Discovers She’s Not Above The Law”
  1. Seriously? She’s saying she’s being treated differently because she’s white? If she were a black man she would’ve already been on the ground in cuffs. Better hold on to that blonde, white female treatment.

  2. I don't mean to be rude and I don't want to offend anybody but that one right there that's one of the ones that just simply is classified as ignorant because she don't even stop talking long enough to let them explain to her what they're saying or what they've said previously

  3. US PRESIDENT LOVES TO CLAIMING ONLY AMERICA IS OWNED THE CITIZENS WITH HIGHEST EDUCATED ABOUTS HUMANS RIGHTS, RESPECTFULLY PEOPLES, EDUCATED CITIZENS AND ALWAYS LOVES TO PUSH OTHERS COUNTRYS LEARNING FROM AMERICA DUE ONLY AMERICA IS THE GREATEST ON EARTH DINT KNOW HOW TO TEACHING ITS OWN CITIZENS HOW TO BEING A RESPECTFULLY TO OTHERS PEOPLES HUMANS RIGHTS AND DONT BEING RUDE LIKES ALL KARENS IN THIS CONTENT.
    ALL KARENS HERE JUST KNOWING SHE OWN THE LAWS AND LOVES TO SPEAKS NASTY

  4. So glad that this privilege is being exposed more and more so police have no choice but to arrest the privilege. Claiming racism from a privileged person. What a hoot! Go Karen.

  5. I don’t understand the C- grade…. If they have probable cause to arrest the woman then they certainly have the right to identify. “I need to see your ID” “do you suspect me of committing a crime?” “Ya, assault” “okay do you have reasonable articulable suspicion?” “Ya, all those people said you assaulted the employee” “okay I’m not gonna give you my ID” “okay you will be arrested for for failure to ID and assault” or am i missing something ?

  6. From these interactions, police fixate far too much on identifying instead of actually investigating. Knowing Karen's name isn't going to determine if a crime was committed.

  7. 15:27 She considers herself above the law, and yet you give her a B-. She shouldn't have gotten anything more than a D. Get the Fxck out of here. Even if you aren't breaking any laws, identify to rule out the possibility that you had nothing to do with it. Fxckin' common sense. If you don't, then you have something to hide. DERP!

  8. Karen: "I'm a Christian woman of God. And you will not put your disgusting hands on me."
    Me if I was a cop: "And I am a Christian and an officer of the law, appointed to me by the state of Texas. Which of course means I have authority."
    Karen: "I don't care! Arrest me!"
    Me: "Ok."

  9. Wow! I was very impressed with the content and detail of this video. I would always prefer to know the final outcome, but I understand that isn’t always possible.

Comments are closed.