Karen Read shares her side of the story ahead of her second trial

Karen Read shares her side of the story ahead of her second trial

Karen Read’s trial shocked the nation and left true crime fans riveted as she waited to learn her fate. Prosecutors allege Karen hit her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O’Keefe, with her car and left him to die in the snow, but she claims she was framed. Now, she’s sharing her side of the story in a new Investigation Discovery documentary ahead of her retrial.

source

Share this post

35 thoughts on “Karen Read shares her side of the story ahead of her second trial

  1. Karen is completely innocent. Such a frame up from all the corrupt law enforcement and their superiors,and the commonwealth,from canton police to the state police ,to the da office,go get the Albert family,go get justice for John Okeefe! Proctor was a proven dirtbag. Go get the others.

  2. My humble and My random thoughts on what happened..

    He did come back out .. never even went inside..and She was pissed that he didn’t care if she came with or not.. An exchange happens through her window.. then she hits the gas to leave as he stands in the street.. drink in hand.. she's angry that he doesn't care if she stays or not.

    She changes her mind and reverses quickly.. he tries to step aside but hits his inner arm and scrapes it along the already broken tailight light. It had been broken from earlier. Drink hits the side of the car and breaks.. there's possible evidence that the drink hit the car.. he falls back and hits his head on the ground.

    She drives off.. freaking out and calling him to tell him how angry she is.. in a way to defend her actions so that he won't be pissed the next morning. He gets up and stumbles over to the corner lawn and dies.

    I think she should be convicted.. maybe not for murder.. but I'd need to see the shirt, because it would be sliced

    Was his coat still on? His shirt and coat are the key for sure I think. If the shirt is not torn in any way, then his shirt had not been on and then I have a completely other theory. Why wasn't this brought up? Seems like very basic common sense.

  3. Karen has been put through financial ruin, emotional trauma, and withstood the lies of the blue wave that continues to blame her for something she was not involved in. Karen has suffered enough, and how she’s doing this also being a victim of health issues is beyond me. She is a strong lady, but you can see that this has dragged her down!❤ it’s time to release Karen from these bogus charges

  4. No proof in courtroom that JOK ever entered the house. The homeowners say he never did and eleven Witness statements say he never did. When is the first time Read said she saw him go in the house. Was it in her documentary? And why did her story change 15 months after his death? How is it possible after the first statement given by her attorney? I wonder if a plea deal was offered back in 2022. I watched the entire Trial 1.0.

  5. Hey guys, I gotta question:
    My grandfather was a well known prosecutor. And I enjoy law history. I’m 18 and new to law history or newly found the love of it. I asked my grandfather about this but he gave me an explanation I don’t think I can repeat….
    Why have people throughout history given j€w$ a hard time? And do they deserve it?

  6. Idk I've been watching since the beginning… I think they effed up so bad she shouldn't be found guilty… But after listening to the trial upteen times, my husband picks up on a beeping in the vms… If u Google lexus backup cam/sensor, it sounds spot on… This is the first time ive mentioned it on social media but I'm always surprised no one else has caught it either

  7. The police involved had some crossover with another case where a fellow officer was convicted a murdering his pregnant gf.. she was underaged when they started and other officers took advantage of her.. whether she is guilty in reality can't be weighed against these officers who have covered up and bungled the investigation

Post Comment