LIVE: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial – MA v. Karen Read – Day 4

1. Worst judge EVER!!! She is clearly only on the state’s side

2. Anyone with a legal background please correct me here?

   It’s up the opposition side to object and give a reason?

   The judge shouldnt object on their behalf or rule without a reason for the objection? Eg “objection hearsay” rather than just “objection” and the judge guess why they are objecting.

3. This judge is terrible

4. This whole “I don’t know her family” but we’ve been
   on trips and I follow her on facebook is bizarre.

5. 48:00 DID THE JUDGE SAY “OBJECTION” AND WAIT FOR THE D.A. TO JUMP IN AND OBJECT🤬corrupt to the CORE!

6. I really hope the Judge or her colleagues read these comments! She is HORRIBLE AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BENCH! All of the cases she presided in need to be reevaluated as well! Likely a number of INNOCENT people in prison right now!

7. Man…judge isn't happy about these social media posts.

8. WE WANT THE WHOLE TRUTH, meanwhile, the Judge and the Prosecutor work in tandem to stop all evidence that supports the defense from coming in. Judge is compromised.

9. Notice there isn’t any other body damage on the car. I’ve hit a few deer in my life and they break more then just a tail light, those bumper cover and trim panels would be dented. The prosecutions arguments are flat out crackhead crazy.

10. I don’t think I have EVER watched a trial with sooooo many side bar interruptions, and I have watched quite a few trials by now.

11. 1:33:00 Is it just me,or does the judge seem to be biased in favor of the Commonwealth?

12. 1:21:49 It’s amazing how the witness is afflicted by the “selective memory disease”, as soon as the defense attorney starts asking questions, but is completely healed, once the procedure steps up to the podium. Witnesses like that lose complete credibility with me, and I would probably not consider any of their testimony. So far the prosecution has scored ZERO points with any of their witnesses, at least in my opinion.

13. I’m baffled as why is it that the lady paramedic said that the defendant repeatedly said I hit him I hit him!?! Wth why not ask with what object? That would be crucial as how he died! Wth is this?

14. I’m wondering if someone at the scene speculated in front of Karen that he may have been hit by a car and that could have spurred the the thought in Karen that maybe she hit him.. that or all the EMTs got on the same page about her saying I hit him. This is not an easy case. It doesn’t make sense that a murder occurred in the house and they would drop the body on the front lawn. But, the injuries absolutely don’t jive with him being struck.

15. Uuuhg…the EMT that keeps sucking his teeth… annoying..

16. At 1:57:57 the defense asks to cross examine and the Judge responds, ok! OK! followed by a sigh, then at 1:58:57 literally says sustained at the exact same time that the defense is objecting without waiting for the objection to be completed.. holy moly… this is so wrong.

17. Omg … I’ve never seen anything like this. I’m so distracted by the Judge’s behavior. She’s downright nasty.

18. I understand that face she has on. She can't trust anyone, not even the judge.

19. Not liking this judge and I don’t say that often. Shes horrible.

20. Defense is on 🔥 🔥

21. I certainly do not want this chick to be my firefighter/emt person if I need one….she can't seem to "recall" anything

22. Does anyone know if that's the O'Keefe family that's sitting to the defense tables left and staring straight at karen read ?😊

23. This judge is completely bias

24. what a corrupt judge!!!!

25. This defense attorney is like Daybell's attorney, condensending, unprofessional, and down right rude!

26. She knows Caitlin. Its incestuous and everyone got the meme–ncredible how the female firefighter lies.

27. Lisa…that’s a big load of baloney..watch testimony again..that narcissist is guilty.

28. 1:27:51 the way Karen looks at her is the stop lying look lol

29. The Defense should seem Ms. McLaughlin as "tainted" due to her knowing one of the people involved in the case is prone to possibly be influenced by that so-called "acquaintance" with her testimony.
    So anything she says should be deemed "inadmissible" & be struck from the record & jury

30. The Judge should have allowed the jury to see the photos. Let the jury decide based on the testimony and the photos if the relationship was close enough to possibly taint McLaughlen’s testimony. There’s no reason to gatekeep this information.

Comments are closed.