Long Overdue Live Stream – with guest Chris Wiest, Esq.

The order referenced in the video is at the link: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2022/08/11/kentucky-officers-denied-qualified-immunity-and-headed-to-trial/

Sounds like the judge was guarding these cops

What will happen to mag light after trail if found guilty,will they slap his hand and tell him to play better or will the pos go to jail?

THERE'S NO LOOPHOLES IN GOD ALMIGHTY HIMSELF PERIOD. THERE'S NO BONES IN THE HOLY SCRIPTURES PEOPLE'S. WICKEDNESS OF MAN ALWAYS TRYING TO CHANGE THE TRUTH OF GOD INTO A LIE. REMEMBER THIS NO MAN IS EQUAL TO GOD NOR IS A MEASURING STICK TO HIM OVERSTAND THAT PART FACTS. WHO MIND IS GREATER THAN GOD ALMIGHTY?

RULE 15. ELECTRONIC MEDIA AND

STILL PHOTOGRAPHY COVERAGE

OF PUBLIC JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

(a) Definition. The terms "electronic media coverage" and "electronic coverage"

are used in the generic sense to include coverage by television, motion picture and still

photography cameras, broadcast microphones and recorders.

(b) Coverage Allowed. Electronic media and still photography coverage of public

judicial proceedings shall be allowed in the appellate and trial courts of this state, subject to the

conditions below.

(1) The presiding justice or judge shall at all times have authority to prohibit or

terminate electronic media and still photography coverage of public judicial proceedings, in the

courtroom or the corridors immediately adjacent thereto.

(2) Coverage of the following types of judicial proceedings is expressly prohibited:

adoption proceedings, juvenile proceedings, proceedings held before clerks of court,

proceedings held before magistrates, probable cause proceedings, child custody proceedings,

divorce proceedings, temporary and permanent alimony proceedings, proceedings for the

hearing of motions to suppress evidence, proceedings involving trade secrets, and in camera

proceedings.

(3) Coverage of the following categories of witnesses is expressly prohibited: police

informants, minors, undercover agents, relocated witnesses, and victims and families of victims

of sex climes.

(4) Coverage of jurors is prohibited expressly at any stage of a judicial proceeding,

including that portion of a proceeding during which a jury is selected. The trial judge shall

inform all potential jurors at the beginning of the jury selection process of the restrictions of

this particular provision which is designated (b)(4).

(c) Location of Equipment and Personnel.

(1) The location of equipment and personnel necessary for electronic media and still

photographic coverage of trial proceedings shall be at a place either inside or outside the

courtroom in such a manner that equipment and personnel are completely obscured from view

from within the courtroom and not heard by anyone inside the courtroom.

(i) If located within the courtroom, this area must be set apart by a booth or

other partitioning device constructed therein at the expense of the media. Such construction

must be in harmony with the general architectural style and decor of the courtroom and must

meet the approval of the Senior Resident Superior Court Judge and the governing body of the

county or municipality that owns the facility.

(ii) If located outside the courtroom any booth or other partitioning device

must be built so that passage to and from the courtroom will not be obstructed. This

arrangement must meet the approval of the Senior Resident Superior Court Judge and the

governing body of the county or municipality that owns the facility.

(2) Appropriate openings to allow photographic coverage of the proceedings under

these rules may be made in the booth or partitioning device, provided that no one in the

courtroom will see or hear any photographic or audio equipment or the personnel operating

such equipment. Those in the courtroom are not to know when or if any such equipment is in

operation.

(3) The presiding judge may, however, exercise his or her discretion to permit the

use of electronic media and still photography coverage without booths or other restrictions set

out in Rule 15(c)(1) and (c)(2) if the use can be made without disruption of the proceedings and

without distraction to the jurors and other participants. Such permission may be withdrawn at

any time.

(4) Video tape recording equipment which is not a component part of a television

camera shall be located in an area remote from the courtroom.

(5) Media personnel shall not exit or enter the booth area or courtroom once the

proceedings are in session except during a court recess or adjournment.

(6) Electronic media equipment and still photography equipment shall not be taken

into the courtroom or removed from the designated media area except at the following times:

(i) prior to the convening of proceedings;

(ii) during the luncheon recess;

(iii) during any court recess with the permission of the presiding justice or judge; and

(iv) after adjournment for the day of the proceedings.

(7) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. and the Chief Judge of the Court of

Appeals, may waive the requirements of Rule 15(c)(1) and (2) with respect to judicial

proceedings in the Supreme Court and in the Court of Appeals, respectively.

(d) Official Representatives of the Media.

(1) This Court hereby designates the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters,

the Radio and Television News Directors Association of the Carolinas, and the North Carolina

Press Association, as the official representatives of the news media. The governing boards of

these associations shall designate one person to represent the television media, one person to

represent the radio broadcasters, and one person to represent still photographers in each county

in which electronic media and still photographic coverage is desired. The names of the persons

so designated shall be forwarded to the Senior Resident Superior Court Judge, the Director of

the Administrative Office of the Courts, and the county manager or other official responsible

for administrative matters in the county or municipality in which coverage is desired.

Thereafter, these persons shall conduct all negotiations with the appropriate officials

concerning the construction of the booths or partitioning devices referred to above. Such

persons shall also be the only persons authorized to speak for the media to the presiding judge

concerning the coverage of any judicial proceedings.

(2) It is the express intent and purpose of this rule to preclude judges and other

officials from having to "negotiate" with various representatives of the news media. Since

these rules require pooling of equipment and personnel, cooperation by the media is of the

essence and the designation of three media representatives is expressly intended to prevent

presiding judges from having to engage in discussion with others from the media.

(e) Equipment and Personnel.

(1) Not more than two television cameras shall be permitted in any trial or appellate

court proceedings.

(2) Not more than one still photographer, utilizing not more than two still cameras

with not more than two lenses for each camera and related equipment for print purposes, shall

be permitted in any proceeding in a trial or appellate court.

(3) Not more than one wired audio system for radio broadcast purposes shall be

permitted in any proceeding in a trial or appellate court. Audio pickup for all media purposes

shall be accomplished with existing audio systems present in the court facility. If no

technically suitable audio system exists in the court facility, microphones and related wiring

essential for media purposes may be installed and maintained at media expense. The

microphones and wiring must be unobtrusive and shall be located in places designated in

advance of any proceeding by the Senior Resident Superior Court Judge of the judicial district

in which the court facility is located. Such modifications or additions must be -approved by the

governing body of the county or municipality which owns the facility. Provided, however,

hand-held audio tape recorders may be used upon prior notification to, and with the approval

of, the presiding judge; such approval may be withdrawn at any time.

(4) Any "Pooling" arrangements among the media required by these limitations on

equipment and personnel shall be the sole responsibility of the media without calling upon the

presiding judge to mediate any dispute as to the appropriate media representative or equipment

authorized to cover a particular proceeding. In the absence of advance media agreement on

disputed equipment or personnel issues, the presiding judge shall exclude all contesting media

personnel from a proceeding.

(5) In no event shall the number of personnel in the designated area exceed the

number necessary to operate the designated equipment or which can comfortably be secluded

in the restricted area.

(f) Sound and Light Criteria.

(1) Only television photographic and audio equipment which does not produce

distracting sound or light shall be employed to cover judicial proceedings. No artificial lighting

device of any kind shall be employed in connection with the television camera.

(2) Only still camera equipment which/does not produce distracting sound or light

shall be employed to cover judicial proceedings. No artificial lighting device of any kind shall

be employed in connection with a still camera.

(g) Courtroom Light Sources. With the concurrence of the Senior Resident

Superior Court Judge of the judicial district in which a court facility is situated, modifications

and additions may be made in light sources existing in the facility, provided such modifications

or additions are installed and maintained without public expense and provided such

modifications or additions are approved by the governing body of the county or municipality

which owns the facility.

(h) Conferences of Counsel. To protect the attorney-client privilege and the right

Dudes hammer 🔨🔨🔨 the judge. it is so wrong.

14:11 genital man. Thank you, that is all I can say form New Zealand.

19:02 Sounds like this judge needs to be hauled out of the court room by her hair and sent to prison for a minimum of 5 years. Followed by public shaming.

hillary clinton conspired to misinform voters via fabricating false narratives about candidate trump.

both obama+biden were informed of this fact prior to the 2016 presidential election + they (both obama+biden) conspired to keep this information from americans, thus increasing the cost of things such as the durham investigation + simultaneously neglecting their oaths+duty's to correct omg any+all misinformation they (obama+biden) were aware of, involving any+all attempts by hillary clinton to create misinformation for the purpose of interferring in a presidential election.

the ripples of obama,biden+clintons crimes have been present since the moment obama+biden failed to advise the dept of justice of their (the doj's) own duty+oath to arrest + prosecute hillary clintion for rico conspiracy to comit election fraud, and the [evidence] indicates obama+biden have themselves committed rico conspiracy to coverup hillary clintons (election interference) + by not informing the public of hillary clinton's crimes, the [evidence] proves biden benefited (personally+politically) by continuing to coverup the fact he had been aware of hillary clinton's crimes for a full 4 years prior to the 2020 election during which he (biden) failed to inform voters a member of his own political party had conspired to fabricate evidence against trump which according to the [evidence] i've seen everyone in the room at the time obama+biden were breifed prior to the 2016 presidential election was aware of the fact there simply wasn't any truth to the lies hillary clinton had conspired to put forth as truth.

and when a former president + former vice president continue to coverup the crimes of a member of their own political party, and at least one of those covering up hillary clinton's crimes (personally+politically) benefits by deceiving american voters 4 years later during a separate presidential election, then dept of justice + fbi has more than sufficient evidence to prosecute all 3. ..obama,biden+clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQNl8PpcSHw

Is there any update on this?????

Great video

Thank you both for your hard work protecting our rights.

More evidence of oath breaking . theres more then enough evidence to classify the blue terrorist as a terrorist organization. . .

Judge isn't doing her job !

I would like to send you something how would I do that

Just questioning the police about a false 911 call made against us was scary.
Conspiring against us while ignoring all evidence & laws, claiming immunity for their actions against us?
Pushing us to settle is scary because the case gets dismissed without any guilt on their part.
Pay us to let them violate us seems insane.

What is this "N" word ? Necromancer ?

Case law is what we need to control qualified immunity🤪😎🇺🇸