The jury for the Wisconsin river stabbing trial came to a unanimous agreement to find killer Nicolae Miu guilty on all charges of first degree reckless homicide, first degree recklessly endangering safety, and battery. Miu still awaits sentencing. Nicolae Miu, 54, is accused of stabbing a teenager to death, and injuring four others, while tubing on the Apple River in Wisconsin back in July of 2022. Isaac Schuman, 17, was killed and Rhyley Mattison, 24, suffered severe stab wounds. Miu is facing multiple charges including first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree homicide, and battery with a dangerous weapon. Miu claims he acted in self-defense.

Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

32 thoughts on “Nicolae Miu Keeps Head Down During Guilty Verdict, Leaves Victims’ Families in Tears – Day 9”
  1. Lying multiple times to police, then in the court was his biggest downfall. If it's self defense, just admit it outright!

    He should've never taken stand. Kept saying he didn't remember so many times really hurt his defense.

  2. Yep …. no surprise that he was found guilty. I think that two pieces of evidence really sunk him and will sink any appeal that he might have. The jury came back with a verdict relatively quickly if you ask me.
    The first strong evidence was the video. It was easy to tell from the video that the kids were just joking around and using him for fun and laughs. His use of deadly force was uncalled for. At the most perhaps he could have gotten his revenge by hitting one of them which he actually did when he punched the woman. But to him that was not enough.
    The 2nd thing was the jailhouse interview. He really came off as a terrible person showing no remorse. He was only concerned with himself. What would it all mean for him.
    Add to that when he took the stand he just came off as a very unlikeable person. I looked for the slightest remorse in his voice or his expression. Essentially he seemed to now say, yep I did it and would do it again!

  3. My advice to defense counsel:. Don't smile benignly in closing arguments while simultaneously trying to appeal to the jurors' lower nature, in an attempt to draw out latent feelings of hatred of "punks". Jurors most likely see through that tactic.

  4. I am surprised his defense team did not enlist trauma specialist to explain behaviors that associated with someone who has gone through a violent episode. I think it could of helped explain his odd behavior, but too late now

  5. This is the worst verdict I’ve ever seen. And for those who say he lied to cover himself, lying wasn’t a charge. Those kids were drunk, decided they owned the river and could make a game of terrorizing and playing with a lone ma. Place them on a street, change their skin color, maybe even take away Mr Mia’s accent, and I guarantee you would have a different outcome.

  6. While observing the trial over the past weekend, I assert that the behaviors exhibited by the individuals in question were unjustified. The repercussions faced by the adolescents stemmed from their own actions. Regrettably, the gentleman who acted in self-defense has already served a two-year sentence, which could be deemed a criminal act. If this incident had occurred in a jurisdiction with a stand your ground law, such as Florida or another state, it is probable that the case would not have gone to trial. Furthermore, he did not approach anyone who was not moving towards him. Therefore, in my view, it is unclear how these charges stuck! I have lost all faith in our justice system. This is a tragedy for both parties, but this judgment was made solely based on the age of the kids involved. What would have been the outcome if this man had hit his head and died when the kids pushed him over? That incident would have influenced my decision-making. Shame on those jurors for not considering that.

  7. I feel sorry for Mr Mui, absolute disgrace that he is even on trial. Those teenagers and adults are the ones that are guilty, guilty of meaness guilty of lying and guilty of having zero kindness! Shame on them for lying under oath absolute disgrace. No honour no integrity, they should be locked up not Mr Mui!

  8. You do not have the right to defend yourself in Wisconsin, you will be railroaded and the full weight of the corrupt attorneys office will crush you without remorse, if you find yourself in a life or death situation in Wisconsin you may as well allow yourself to be killed and spare yourself a miserable life in prison, or beg at your attackers feet for mercy. Must be something in the cheese up there, I'm really curious about this jury, did they put themselves in Mr. Miu's shoes? To be convicted of first degree intentional homicide, there must be premeditation, planning to kill, you must show intent, how did they prove intent in this case? I am sincerely curious how the jury came to the conclusion that Mr. Miu walked up to those teens with the intent to murder them, at what point was this plan conceived and made manifest in the suspect's mind? All of these are interesting questions that should be answered, if the jury wishes to speak.

Comments are closed.