š Get up to 50% OFF a Babbel subscription! ā”ļø Here: https://go.babbel.com/6m50-youtube-audittheaudit-march-2021/default
Second Channel: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0QVhEdqyxI
Billings Gazetteās channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoumKpcPlYB3z1C4h1MlzQg
Sources:
Bureau of Indian Affairs FAQs- https://on.doi.gov/3fvNS8t
Fiftieth Congress. Sess. I. Ch. 213- https://bit.ly/3uc0Oo0
Article 1, Section 8- https://bit.ly/3cFhPB8
Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe- https://bit.ly/3cHV5Aj
Duro v. Reina- https://bit.ly/39w5mxy
Strate v. A-1 Contractors- https://bit.ly/2R07p6I
United States v. Cooley- https://bit.ly/2OieuP4
United States v. Cooley (SCOTUS Blog)- https://bit.ly/2PunPDZ
25 USC 5501- https://bit.ly/39Ayx2C
25 USC 5502- https://bit.ly/2QOdFyb
Gobin v. Snohomish County- https://bit.ly/3fAJ2GW
Indian Reorganization Act of 1948: https://bit.ly/2R7XX1d
News Articles-
https://bit.ly/3rAcOxY
https://bit.ly/31tPiYX
https://bit.ly/3szWFKj
https://bit.ly/3cFZPXi
š Get up to 50% OFF a Babbel subscription! ā”ļø Here: https://go.babbel.com/6m50-youtube-audittheaudit-march-2021/default
This was wild
To be fair to all parties tribal jurisdiction is in fact a ridiculously complex system.
I was driving down I 90 in a different reservation not all far from here and tribal police pulled me over for speeding he told me he canāt legally ticket me because I was on the interstate which is federal jurisdiction and state troopers. Canāt patrol it because itās native land so all he can do is tell you to slow downššš
Tribal jurisdiction even varies based on who committed the crime whether they are native or non-native and who the victim is whether they are native and non-native, it is ridiculously confusing and impossible to memorize.
Sometimes it even depends on which reservation you were on due to federal funding allocations
That being said the game warden shouldāve just left and if he was convinced he was in the right he could talk to his supervisor and he can get it squared away later
"Everybody in the country" "9th Circut" – but not their country nor court, the country and court of those who invaded and stole the land now telling the rest of the First People how to live.
Good! Y'all got the land from your ancestors who stole the land and defrauded it from the First People.
The courtās majority opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, found that tribal lands are part of the states they are in, and not entirely separate sovereign powers.
This there land cops hold no weight šš
Definitely one of the more interesting legal analysis of your videos
It was all their land once upon a time.
If the issue in question is about hunting on their own lands, and having their own set of rules and regulations, apart from U. S. Law, then they're not doing anything wrong, by hunting according to what their Tribal Regulations are.
This White Guy was WAY out of line! He should've been dealt with, accordingly!
They are called natives not Indian. Im part natives and i find it rude to call us Indian. We are not from India. š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬š¤¬
Again sheriffs think there above the law. When they tow civilian vehicles they are stealing. That what that deputy said. That is stealing. Because sheriff and city and state police are above the law
Police don't have constitutional rights while on duty. They are public service so the constitution doesn't apply. šš. Now they are worried about the constitution.
65876896780896d
Your argument that hunting on tribal lands impacts non indian lands that are adjacent justifies the game warden in enforcing state law on tribal lands is flawed and offensive.
If we look at the say the Canada US border and the Canadians do something on their land that impacts US citizens or US game in the US. As long as it doesn't violate international law, tough. It's quite possible for Canadian hunting seasons to be different than US hunting seasons. We have no authority to change Canadian hunting seasons based on its inevitable impact on the game or enforce US hunting regulations on Canadian soil because it impacts game on US lands.
Therefore we have no right to adjust hunting seasons of the indian nations.
Admittedly there is a complication with the purchased lands not having the same status as the original lands. Which is the nexus of the dispute here. The indian nation want their law to apply to all of their lands, and do not recognize that the purchased land is not protected in the same manner as the original lands granted to them. The fact the purchased land was done as a part of an exchange further complicates matters, which is no doubt why the Indians are wanting to dispute. I wonder if the land that was exchanged to allow gold mining was returned to the indian nation or not. If the gold mining land is still US land, then the exchange should be done with equal rights or the indian nation has been cheated along the way. Not that the US would ever cheat the Indians.
It seams quite simple the native Americans are 100% right, its their land, be respectful and kind.
I'm so glad I pay for premium so I don't watch commercials. Then you throw them in anyways. Yet another channel to be blocked.
Fuck your sponsored content. I pay for premium
Silly Indians. You're in charge of nothing.
A.C.A.C
Cops etc just need to stay off tribal land. Its simple.
Just stay off their land! Simple…
Get in your truck and leave. Did the red faces not learn their lesson the first time
"It was the eagle on Mount Ickiya that gave us the authority to hunt lands our forefathers kept for us. Over-hunting, over-shmunting, when the bear sleeps we must feed our young like the mountain lions of the Apache mountains" – Chief Kief
The real Yellowstone š š
These Settler's according to Treaties (Two Row Wampum) once they enter our lands of sovereign Nations then they have no rights because USA laws do NOT apply on traditional territories, and usa laws do not have JURISDICTION what soo ever.
Learn your TREATIES, ESPECIALLY YOU SETTLERS. YOUR ANCESTOR'S AGREED TO THESE AGREEMENTS AND YOU ALL SHOULD OUT OF RESPECT KNOW THEM.
They get so mad when what they do to everyone else gets done to them. All of a sudden it is a problem!
Local County and really State police have no rigjts on Indian Reservations
Let's just get him out of here and all sit round a table and talk this out. [TRANSLATION] – how dare you exercise the rights that the Government has given you.