Officer Loses It and Costs the City Thousands – Everything Law and Order Blog

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original videos:

Arkansasonline’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbyEnE6SRWUld03ZxhYjZvQ

NEA Report’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb5e6HAtw4BY_5VpNW9zv5A

Sources:

Articles- https://wapo.st/2UUfzQh
https://bit.ly/2WqIaNA

United States v. Robinson- https://bit.ly/38DJAau

Scott v. United States- https://bit.ly/38ARiSv

Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ

Heien v. North Carolina- https://bit.ly/2Yd8trm

Ark. Code § 5-39-203- https://bit.ly/3zHfG0Q

Ark. Code § 5-38-101- https://bit.ly/3njWR0v

Ark. Code § 5-54-102- https://bit.ly/3kTdxZT

Ark. Code § 5-54-101- https://bit.ly/3zSwOR6

Ark. Code § 5-54-103- https://bit.ly/3ByCUH1

Hyman Lawsuit- https://bit.ly/3BQLuBd
https://bit.ly/3DIIgRF

source

By elboriyorker

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO elboriyorkeratgmailcom (www.phillyfinest369.com)

35 thoughts on “Officer Loses It and Costs the City Thousands”
  1. When someone applies to be a police officer it needs to be determined are they in it to help people or bully people. At this point the bad ones can be weeded out. This cop is clearly a bully.

  2. What happened here is simple

    Tl:dr: The cop decided to exercise his training on a citizen

    THATS why they defended him, because they only care about “officer safety”

    Give up your freedom for security, youll get neither because you deserve neither

    The long of it….

    Cops are trained with scenarios exactly like this where the trainer will randomly say shit exactly like this guy did

    “No I belong here – I can prove it. Lemme show you something” they turn to the back of the truck and pull out a dummy shotgun and shoot the trainee

    They do this repeatedly till the cop has ptsd – they’ll start seeing malice in ordinary behavior because he was trained to expect malice after ordinary behavior. Cops are trained to prevent bad behavior, to do so they’re trained to expect bad behavior from ordinary people.

    That said, the training doesn’t teach them how to deescalate – it only teaches a “ladder” approach where they’re expected to be one rung up the ladder higher than everyone they encounter

    It means the cop will “close the gap” before there’s a fight so they’re ready for it, it means they’ll put hands on someone first, it means they’ll draw before someone gets a chance to even “reach for it”

    If they see a weapon, a cop pulls theirs out before the other person can reach for theirs. Awful training

    It escalates. The correct step is to put hand on weapon, not draw.

    The correct step is to walk back and put hands up saying “let’s not fight,” not put hands on someone first (hands up is a way to ready your hands for a fight)

    The correct step is to fix posture and lean on correct side to ready for a fight, not “close the gap”

  3. You know the chief knows his officer did everything wrong. The fact that he refuses to show anyone the footage and tells them go FOIA it proves it. If they were in the right they would be so happy to show the proof.

  4. California law does require the police to verbalize the reason for the stop at the beginning of the stop. Every state should adopt this law.

  5. the original officer was in the army. I'm thinking he had ptsd — whereby normal gestures are misinterpreted because of heightened anxiety.

  6. The man shouldn’t have settled (I don’t mean the legal term) for only about $58,000. The man who was assaulted should have got millions.

  7. 11 days and a law suit way to go has to be a record 😂😂😂😂😂🎉😂🎉🎉😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉😢😢😢😢😢😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😅😅😮😢🎉🎉😢😮😮😅😅😮😢🎉😂🎉😢😮😅🎉😂🎉😢😮😅

  8. Suspicious is not a crime 😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😮😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

  9. Dumb cop…he did not tell Mr. Finley to remove his hands from his pockets, did not say anything about him moving towards the open door vehicle….this cop focused on all the wrong things, and made up some…good that he was fired before he did any further damage.

  10. Was this officer's first career as a Marine Corps drill sergeant? Heck, even Army drill sergeant did go off on me like this.

  11. The absolute entitlement of that stupid cop. He says he's talking to him man to man but speaks to him in a condescending and berating manner!

Comments are closed.